Avatar
Chris Monetary Maximalist Eleutheropraxeology
5341dedd0eed04d2bcc75d9c58f274ca741615c0c3a0a33ed0c6811f178fb15d
Sapere Aude! Educate yourself, do not trust, verify and act accordingly. Most importantly understand the individual uneasiness. Question everything! Study Eleutherology, Praxeology and BitCoin Advanced Bitcoin Mantras (from Bitcoiners for Bitcoiners): Study BitCoin Not your seed, not your UXTOs Not your regular node, not your rules Not your miner, not your network Not your selected pool, not your defense

we pay miners to perform correct, honest transaction confirmations. We don’t pay them to decide the rules, we pay them to follow the rules. The rules are decided collectively by everyone, you and me, by running our Bitcoin software of choice.

@kallerosenbaum

That’s not true anymore.

E.g. ASICs

At that time Bitcoin nodes could act as archival node, mine node and user access to transaction propagation in one system (machine).

Since then the game theory has changed.

🤣 also in Bitcoin space

SegWit + Taproot: policy making

Ord/Inscriptions: „that‘s not what that policy was meant for” 😂

1. The Taproot upgrade in 2021 removed the data limit entirely, as long as it fits inside a block. Segregated Witness (Segwit) software upgrade in 2017 allows up to 3MB of witness data to be stored ‘outside’ of the 1MB block limit. Together, they provide up to 4MB worth of storage space for the inscription content.

2. Inscriptions are stored in an “envelope” between Opcodes OP_IF and OP_ENDIF. OP_FALSE precedes OP_IF to ensure that this data is never actually used in script execution and does not take up stack space. No OP_RETURN is used, and the output containing an inscription is spendable and thus unprunable.