Just another question (I find a little entrainment with this chat).
Why and how did you change the OP_RETURN directive and why did you place it at all?
nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk
Sure. How can you proof that?
And by the way, finally answer following:
“
This is interesting, and is a possible way to embed messages inside anonymous payments, at the cost of transaction fees.
So if a payment contains a No-op string that says "Message encrypted for Public Key [xxx]: [yyyyy]" then that gets passed along to the destination? Or even "Cleartext message to recipient: [zzzzz]."
Of course the content of these messages - the [xxx] or [yyyyy] have nothing to do with Bitcoin, but they could be used as part of a layer on top of Bitcoin.
The reason I'm so interested in embedding messages is that they allow use of a "static" anonymity network like Freenet, rather than a "live" network like Tor or I2P. Live networks have exit nodes, a few of which can be compromised. If a government compromises 1% of all exit nodes, then they have a small chance of figuring out where a given site is hosted. So to use my Heroin Store example, they would send an N byte message to the store and watch all of their compromised exit nodes for N byte messages. They'd do this over a few hours, watching where N byte messages got sent to, eventually discovering the IP address of the store.
In a network like Freenet, data just floats around - there is no one machine where a website (for example) lives. You publish data to the cloud, and as long as people access it periodically, it stays around.
“
Is it an AI?
Thanks for sharing :)
nostr:note14ehtvy06mdnpkap3snqpdwsa9v8n7rxgw8wrapuutu3lnv4nqwhs8dgfyp
nostr:note128xr3ewd8pv2y36w29s6x3sgmfqkfuj9p0s882u780cyu2m429aq7w0leg
nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 bruh. Are you an Agent of Chaos? 😅
Also was active promoting Ordinal Theory
nostr:note13wk5s6gnlm9pwz53rhru697td2yzlmh0t4dgv30hxf6cyymufjls8hu2ke
nostr:note1x4n0v8pgw90p7ts8tyh57pv4rfeer9vwn779j9cpk390cnwvevhsdpq4ff
Like it or not, the Bitcoin system faces the struggles of control taking; reduction of decentralization into an increment of
centralization.
Big pools are striving to become “the” nodes of Bitcoin, uniting again mining and storage activities while wiping out the non-mining nodes via equipment and operation cost increment.
To be able to retrain Bitcoin decentralization, people will need to run a regular Bitcoin node + a affordable mining device and connecting it to a public share hash rate pool.
Running at least a regular Bitcoin node wouldn’t be sufficient for self-defense and dealing with the challenges triggered by actors interested in the centralized vision for Bitcoin.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-miners-btc-price-98k-halving
nostr:note1nzz3zpzl63yhlteq27qpxky8fy8v49jf3l4su4tyw6vf3y46yn2symymf2
Fuente de experiencia, know-how en un entorno extremo; sin embargo, muy pocos conocen la razón de ese encarecimiento y muy pocos saben o tienen acceso a formas de mitigar un poco la situación en el caso individual.
It looks similar to this:
https://twitter.com/ChrisMartl/status/1666670665024380929?s=20
See whole thread.
I really wish F2Pool a hard time.
https://orangepill.ovh/fr/tx/fe136a0f339051845bce8ca7c087e853bf15abea65db3ad78e7ac55a571af7ea
“Strange/rare” Sats distribution after auction?
At a first glance, it looks like it is a lightweight Bitcoin full node (a node that only downloads the block headers instead of the entire history); thus, not useful for newcomer’s IBD phase, since it is not an archival full node. But I can be wrong. I’ve not done enough due diligence regarding that topic.