Seems like every option leads to “lump sum outperformed DCA”

got really confused at first...

I set the drop downs to what I thought was a 6 Year evaluation of a $200 weekly DCA...

Took me a while to realize that the total investment was $200 ... (312 weeks of $0.64 DCA... I think ... still not entirely sure)

Please make it clear what the weekly DCA amount is... based on the silly user's inputs

... And consider allowing my mental approach... $200 per week for 6 years = $200 x 6 x 52 = 62,400 total investment (calculate the total investment and use the weekly DCA s the base case... toggle swtich between the two approaches?)

I have used DCA at various times, with some short and some longer duration time periods . It would be nice if you could set a start and end date at any time in the past and have it calculate and graph that particular period…

are you assuming I have the full sum at the start and am either lump sum or dca buying?

If so, depending on the time frame, you might need to factor inflation into the DCA time frame.

For example, say I had 100k cash in 2020 and assume a 5 year time frame for the dca model. There was around 20-30% inflation. That's a significant cost for holding the lump sum that probably should be factored into the dca model.

AI is great and all, but I prefer natural materials formed over millions of years as calcium carbonate precipitates from mineral-rich groundwater in sedimentary environments, gradually crystallizing into an orange, honeycomb pattern of fibrous crystals separated by white calcite membranes.

twitter is a business for me. i post all my personal stuff on nostr. because here, it feels like a family.

Que comida es?

1X?

800 watts? You must have pretty cheap electricity. I bet you don't live in communist europe.

Time for ride with my beauty have a great weekend and keep staking ⚡️🧡

Pre-mined

Men, have kids. You’ll enjoy it way more than society tells you.