Avatar
HODLBurger
56ce3f3a2caccb3404c20a38e704c3c4d12de3e157bd5920af56a3bd295065c5
The node is in your heart.

Equal outcome is not (and should not be) the goal.

If the money works to store value, one is incentivized to hold it versus consuming or "hoarding" actual resources.

The 'problem' you're describing is only a problem when we have a broken money.

You're missing the point that with sound money they would have had to create value to get that money in the first place. Without artificially cheap debt value has to be created into the world to accrue money.

Replying to Avatar Maya Parbhoe

This type of "asset hoarding" is a fiat easy money problem, where the money is no good to hold value over time, so scarse resources are monetized are held instead. With a money that actually worked to store value, hoarding MONEY means more real resources or value must have been produced into the world.

Replying to Avatar Base58⛓🔓

nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a asked a great question yesterday: why no temporary softforks?

Here's Base58's niftynei on the difficulty with adding opcodes to bitcoin

https://m.primal.net/HTwk.mp4

Would you mind giving us an example of some things that this would work for?

Multi sig 3/5 or 2/3

Cold Card

+

Seed Signer

+

Not a Ledger

Vendor diversity + ability to lose 1/3 or 2/5 keys. Descriptor backed up with each key.

In an old forum post he said he wanted to make it 42 as a hitchhiker's guide reference but didn't think people would take it seriously so cut that in half.

Interestingly the numbers work out really nicely with 21 million where the amount of coins distributed each block is the same as the percentage of the total coins distributed in that epoch. That's to say when 50 coins per block were distributed, 50% of the total supply was distributed by the end of that epoch.

Yes, gets omega 6 down to ~5-10 % from like 10-20 in olive/avocado and 50-70% in seed oils. Ghee is just clarified butter and tallow is just rendered (usually beef) fat.

This just seems like the same kind of not quite accurate marketing as the people who used to say bitcoin had "cheap, anonymous transactions."

It all depends on your threat model I suppose, but unless you're taking extra steps to not dox your network connection and shield your use from your ISP, "anonymous" is a bit too strong of language for my taste.

Focus on censorship resistance, that's not a stretch and won't get people in trouble for taking the meaning literally.

There's no flavor really, but mastic gum is really nice to chew on for hours at a time. It doesn't break down like most modern gum.