"Valuable" narratives ordinals shitcoiners are trying to carve into #bitcoin 's ethos: "Satoshi was a bitch for leaving" and

"We have to define who's in control of bitcoin"

Two vids for your daily dose of bitcoin cringe.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1735767072762679296/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/nth4tysgZ2lH9LZz.mp4

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1735419783070253056/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/A2Qx3_LhSNSKVhVx.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So this is an attack

Always has been

These are not serious people. Just scammers who won't stand the test of time.

What a pair of cunts

You forgot “dirty” before cunts.

“Elon Moist” is funny, credit where it’s due. (didn’t watch the video, zero interest in their message)

😂 😂 😂 I would like to take responsibility of controlling Bitcoin, you're welcome

Poor guy is sacrificing

Elon Moist (gross name) blinks like a liar

Very punchable faces.

Get in the queue 😉

LOL future CAWs

🤡🤡

Satoshi was probably sacked for what he did (giving away freedom tech). That "joke" does sound like he knows it and laughs about it. In other words, it's not a joke, it is the truth trying to come out.

nostr:note15ve59qrxg47fvh6n8empcu8y7e4d7x3gk3qpp3k6yxw8vmcwe4yq58hnh7

🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

Don't worry guys, he's here to fix it.

This is cringy AF. They're right about property rights being the most important thing. But the concept that bitcoin should be solely owned by any one person is insanely stupid. The concept that a society needs to be owned by any one person is stupid. That's where you get government from. That's called monopoly. That's unnecessary. Decentralization of control is a good thing. It's a sign that it is working for the greater good. Each individual owns his part of bitcoin and that's it. That's a good thing. Consensus about ordinals cannot merely filter through one man or one corporation, since no one person owns the Bitcoin network. Whatever the market decides will be the legitimate course of action. The current use of ordinals is legitimate. But this attempt to claim that the anarchy of bitcoin is a bad thing or indicative of poorly defined property rights is a thin attempt to justify some misguided hunger for power to force their vision for bitcoin ordinals upon the rest of us. It's pretty pathetic.