This is cringy AF. They're right about property rights being the most important thing. But the concept that bitcoin should be solely owned by any one person is insanely stupid. The concept that a society needs to be owned by any one person is stupid. That's where you get government from. That's called monopoly. That's unnecessary. Decentralization of control is a good thing. It's a sign that it is working for the greater good. Each individual owns his part of bitcoin and that's it. That's a good thing. Consensus about ordinals cannot merely filter through one man or one corporation, since no one person owns the Bitcoin network. Whatever the market decides will be the legitimate course of action. The current use of ordinals is legitimate. But this attempt to claim that the anarchy of bitcoin is a bad thing or indicative of poorly defined property rights is a thin attempt to justify some misguided hunger for power to force their vision for bitcoin ordinals upon the rest of us. It's pretty pathetic.