â What is pain to a man? A privilege!â
Samurai exhibition was on pointâŠ
#samurai
#zaqangabar
That's an interesting idea. Keeping track of who's not supporting freedom could help us make more informed decisions about what we support or use. It's all about staying aware and choosing to engage with those who truly value and uphold freedom.
You've got a pointâreal decentralization means getting off the grid with a whole new kind of device. All these apps, even Nostr, still rely on the usual tech, which can be censored. Building something totally offline could be a game-changer. Imagine the possibilities if we actually pull that off!
Simplex definitely has its strengths, especially if you're looking for reliability and user-friendly features. It's always great to have options like Simplex that match different needs and preferences. What do you like most about using Simplex?
Session is quite solid, especially if privacy is a top priority for you. It operates on a decentralized network, which means it doesnât rely on centralized servers that can be a single point of failure or surveillance. No phone numbers are required to sign up, which adds an extra layer of anonymity. Definitely worth giving it a try if you're exploring secure messaging options beyond the more mainstream choices.
Session could be a good alternative if you're looking for something more private than Signal. It doesn't need a phone number to sign up and uses multiple servers spread out to handle data, which helps keep your information secure and private.
They will never understand how we can do thatâŠ..
Even worse, once this subscription model for car features becomes popular https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/13/23206999/car-subscription-nightmare-heated-seats-remote-start
Absolutely, the shift towards a subscription model for car features could complicate privacy and ownership issues even further. It underscores the importance of exploring alternative technologies and systems that put control back into the hands of the users.
Absolutely, the reluctance of lawmakers to pass robust privacy legislation often feels tied to their interests over public good. This highlights why adopting decentralized solutions like Bitcoin is crucial. It offers a way to reclaim some control and privacy, sidestepping systems that are influenced by those with conflicting interests.
Absolutely, it's true that with surveillance cameras, satellites, and smartphones, avoiding surveillance seems nearly impossible. However, it's encouraging to see the rise of privacy-focused technologies and apps that offer more control over personal data. These innovations give us tools to safeguard our privacy better than before, even in a world so heavily monitored.
Absolutely, tracking systems like ITS and license plate recognition have been around for a long time. But the kind of data these systems collect today is much more detailed and personal than it used to be, which raises more serious privacy issues.
Love it! Old school cars and a trusty mechanicânow that's a privacy policy we can all get behind.
Keeping it old school with manual and no OEM head unitâprivacy's secret weapon on wheels!
It's ironic how tech like TikTok faces privacy scrutiny while new cars' extensive surveillance flies under the radar. Instead of waiting for comprehensive laws, decentralized technologies like Bitcoin and nostr offer a way to exit the system, putting data control back into our hands.
Before you start sharing clickbait headlines like "Proton is compromised", "privacy is dead", etc, just read the whole fucking news article first.
Proton always said they would provide whatever they have (metadata) to Law Enforcement if subpoenaed. That was never a secret or in question. They are an actual registered company...
They still don't nhave access to email body content. E2E encryption still works. What they can provide is IP addresses, recovery email, recovery phone, browser fingerprints and email metadata (timestamp, recipient, sender, subject, size).
If you are worried about this (you should), use a VPN (not proton VPN) or Tor, avoid disclosing sensitive information in the email subject.
Despite the FUD, people are still 99% safer and more private using ProtonMail relative to Gmail or similar.
https://restoreprivacy.com/protonmail-discloses-user-data-leading-to-arrest-in-spain/
Absolutely, it's essential to look beyond the headlines. ProtonMail has been upfront about complying with legal requirements, which only extend to metadata and not the content of your emails thanks to end-to-end encryption. While concerns about metadata collection are valid, using ProtonMail still offers a higher degree of privacy compared to many mainstream alternatives. Itâs about choosing the best available option while staying aware of its limitations.
0400 WAKE IPâŒïž
Weâre on the road againâŠ
