VTOL VR's Homesick mission is miserable.
"Oh no! ... This is going to have lasting consequences."
Dark Skippy has revealed some legitimate security issues which need to be addressed.
That said, we donβt need to freak out. There are already a number of mitigations in place (and more on the horizon).
nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 and nostr:npub1emdtsxly9m68m00x206t574jttp65vk0c2m89ms038q047yz7ylqcac9aw discuss some of these mitigations in BR072.
"It's been working in the market" is the kind of exploit response that should make the hair on the back of your neck stand on end.
Faulkner. Though, depending on how you want to evaluate rationalism you could put the AI, having no other emotions or concerns, at the top.
At least taxes pretend to provide transparency and agency. Rent seeking prevents either.
It's a complex topic to discuss, so I try to reduce it to simple principals. In this case, the article leads with a dishonest statement that groups a large thing, the energy usage of all data centers, with a much smaller one, the usage by AI and crypto. In the body they make other illogical comparisons, such as the energy cost compared to a Google search, but presumably not a corresponding fraction of the dependent Google services, or those expended by anyone that they're indexing, or loading the page that was searched for, or whether the same value was ultimately provided by this single Google search. Once you see the pattern of cherry picking and logical fallacies, it becomes clear that if you actually care about the environment, this IMF article shouldn't be trusted. And really, any climate change article that isn't almost exclusively about the carbon based energy industries shouldn't be trusted, as these are most of the problem. Austerity (of any form other than pricing) is about control: more non carbon energy is the only real solution.
"Crypto mining and data centers now account for 2 percent of global electricity use"
Wow, that's an amazing bundle.
This kids pail and the ocean account for 99.999% of all the salt water in the world.
A rational person might ask what the relative contributions are.
nostr:npub1melv683fw6n2mvhl5h6dhqd8mqfv3wmxnz4qph83ua4dk4006ezsrt5c24 You mentioned subkeys on r/nostr. Did that go anywhere?
If John Wick has taught us anything... 
The "next word predictor" model is pervasive and disappointingly ridiculous. If you present an LLM with a logic puzzle and it gives you the correct answer, how did it "predict the next word"? Yes, the output came in the form of additional tokens. But deciding which tokens were "most likely" required logical thought, and it's a mistake to take the "what" as the "how".
#LLM #AI
To control credit is to decide what is good.
Anything with dramatic music is either doing the right thing wrong, or the wrong thing right.
Sure, as long as you only use friendly relays in favorable jurisdictions and nobody ever archives or reposts them. Yes, then you can rely on government censorship to compel well known relays to remove your own data. If your signed messages are still available elsewhere... is that really deleting them?
It's a big country that's growing quickly, so it's easy to pick out flashy statistics. I think the bottom line is how they track compared to the US, and by that metric it's going well. Emerging countries could probably get a bit of a break, but otherwise everyone should be held to the same standards per-capita-ish.
Like going from 300 Kelvin to 600 Kelvin I'm sure. We can agree to disagree on that half: I think we both agree that more energy and less control is the better future.
China knows... this year they had about the same percentage of renewable generation as the US. The rate of change is a bit different though: 
The data is pretty clear that there has been a dramatic change in atmospheric composition and climate stability. That said, austerity and fine grained control is a solution that only benefits a small number of people. Moar energy and basic, loophole free regulation is the solution that benefits everyone.

