Avatar
τέχνη
577de06dce160a0379163a4bb7b680be3e0a0e1c68de6e6ba8c01134b44064dd
chronic early adopter of decentralized tech :)
Replying to Avatar rabble

nostr:npub12a77qmwwzc9qx7gk8f9m0d5qhclq5rsudr0xu6agcqgnfdzqvnwsfrrdyd I’m 100% that the lack of jobs in New Zealand has nothing to do with the American H1B visa system.

I don’t know what life is like in New Zealand, but I can’t imagine it would be different for tech unless there are laws against outsourcing. Do you know if there are?

There is no serious company in the world that has started using AI in any official capacity. It just has not had an impact on jobs yet.

But they will claim it has, because this gives them a cover for their outsourcing.

Odd, I didn’t get anything. I notice I get a spinning wheel when trying to add you as a contact

Replying to Avatar rabble

I had an interesting conversation at a friend’s birthday party with a few folks who were professionals but had been unemployed and looking for work for a while. I pointed out that with AI rapidly improving, many of the jobs that have been cut likely aren’t coming back.

They dismissed AI entirely as just a cheap imitation. Their experience was limited to trying ChatGPT over a year ago and seeing some clumsy early attempts by the New Zealand government to use AI. For them, that was enough evidence to label the whole field as an overhyped, short-lived scam.

It shocked me because, from my perspective, AI has been advancing incredibly quickly. I use these tools regularly in my work, and with a bit of focus on learning them properly, these emerging large language models (LLMs) are truly transformational. On top of that, innovation is accelerating rapidly, making AI both smarter and more accessible.

I’m not sure if we’ll reach AGI or ASI anytime soon, but it’s clear to me that society and our economy will be fundamentally transformed by AI.

This conversation reminded me just how much of a bubble technologists can live in. We see AI’s potential clearly and understand how quickly things can spread once they reach a tipping point. But most people probably won’t believe this transformation is real until it’s already underway. Instead of traditional economic institutions adapting their ways of working to integrate AI, we’ll likely see new institutions and methods emerge to replace the legacy systems entirely.

I’m genuinely concerned about how our economy will cope with the decoupling of work from primary economic systems. And when I think about how to spend my time while waiting for even more powerful AI tools—beyond just experimenting in my own work—I’m uncertain. Part of the answer seems to be designing new systems from the ground up around AI, and also continuing to tell people that AI isn’t just a passing trend.

This situation isn’t fundamentally different from what happened with Web 2.0 platforms like Twitter. The core human needs remained the same, but new technologies changed how we fulfilled those needs. Twitter didn’t replace our desire to stay connected with friends; it just made it faster and broadened our definition of who could be a “friend.”

So, looking forward, I think we need to ask ourselves: what would an AI-native version of everything we currently use look like? Most people and institutions won’t adapt—they’ll more likely be replaced. Does that mean we should just rush headlong into replacing everything with AI-driven alternatives?

> I pointed out that with AI rapidly improving, many of the jobs that have been cut likely aren’t coming back.

Lack of jobs has nothing to do with AI and everything to do with outsourcing and H1B.

Yes, AI is helpful. But you are actually the ill informed one if you think companies aren’t hiring because of it.

Companies *are* hiring. They’re just not hiring citizens.

The use case is when a convo starts about one thing and diverges topics, but the chat title is still just about the initial thing.

Also convos include a wide range of things often that can’t easily be summed up

Will the search include stuff in the body of the chat as well? Is that possibly coming in the future?

Not all have forgotten. But the ones that don’t understand why young people are going back to flip phones…. They have forgotten.

Get the app on your AppStore and look up my npub. And message me haha. Just want to see how the UX is

Gen X and older really have forgotten what it was like to party without smartphones. Total freedom to just have fun with basically no fear. When you did see a camera, it was very obviously a camera and you can interact with it as such. No ambiguity, so no creepiness.

Yeah, pretty much that. Not just the online social stuff, but it’s also pretty obvious that even the presence of a smartphone kills the vibe in a way that is hard to put into words. Maybe the possibility of being recorded at any given moment? I think the youngest generations are realizing it. It’s why you’ll see a lot of flip phones in the hippest neighborhoods

Anyone want to test nostr:npub1tm99pgz2lth724jeld6gzz6zv48zy6xp4n9xu5uqrwvx9km54qaqkkxn72 with me? Not sure who else is using messaging that works with the new NIP-104 MLS

Granted, I am all for the movement to get rid of smartphones. Maybe that will pick up traction and web apps will become popular again. Sounds like a miracle, but we can pray.

nostr:note1d487vajcsjepwf7w4x5eyve4d4lt7zwhz3w85w42fjcd5v7zauhsq9clxn

The elephant in the room with decentralized social / messaging is that nobody will ever use a web app. A web app will *never* gain significant adoption.

Better to have a severely limited and ugly native mobile app than to have an incredibly polished and robust web app.

The lack of user-owned compute will forever be the problem with Nostr. I’m bullish on Urbit again… can’t believe I’m saying it

nostr:note1pgt2e5n4qeadre4ggpp8laz78fljx8k9tq70j3qg3fwjxp3v9aqs94dz7n

I do love Rostra (and other P2P social things), but you will always run into this issue of compute.

People want a feeling of security and safety. They want Access Control Lists, friend requests, permissions. You need compute for that.

It’s why I still believe in Urbit. It’s the closest thing to a digital home we have. P2P social + safety and security. Users actually have their own compute. And it’s understandable where data lives (at my house, at your house, etc)

Extrapolating this out, why aren’t the biggest free relays showing us ads in our notifications?

It’s simple. When a user queries for notes, every so often, present notes that they didn’t ask for. Maybe even base the ads you show them on their existing activity. You now have a rival to Google/Meta ads.

nostr:note1f83ugm0mqjcq6jnqxuxaqj44n9uq8xnrkngzv8s6293y56vwve2s47xqnf

If the relay isn’t paid, it should be run by an existing business.

It should be like a Pizza Planet relay that advertises pizza to you every so often in your notifications. That would be an honest and sustainable business model.

I have a use case for this actually.

Prove that someone lives in a certain area. Mail a code to someone and they enter the code they were mailed, then they get the attestation that they live in a city or state etc. Could do this process once a year to verify.

Then stuff like civil discourse becomes much more meaningful. No bots or people from other locations chiming in.