Avatar
AM
581756dcd4766f12b3345af6571ae055199d4a2966ea1d99fb654e294e522d37
Consensus, not coercion.

Cause people will tell you who they are, we just need to listen to them.

Replying to Avatar ₿ujuX

facts

Those who know, know.

Good luck friend , be safe ❤️

Look around you , do you really even want them to come ?

Replying to Avatar GOMA

Blood orange 🍊

I found my kindle 1 year later at a lost in found in the same place I lost it. A train station in Osaka.

If you work in the city for a Japanese company yes , but it’s gotten a little better. If you work for an American or European company it’s very laid back. You can actually tell just by looking at the skyscrapers at night, the ones with the lights off are American.

Learning a new language is unlocking a new world you never imagined, and if you work remote you don’t really need to learn Japanese. Money is the best tool for communication.

Yea the honeymoon phase with my high school sweetheart.

Replying to Avatar ODELL

The real hack is to live in Japan and get payed in USD.

i spent the last couple of days analyzing other bitcoin podcasts, trying to understand why they get more listeners

the short obvious explanation: they are less technical, more approachable to the masses

the more in-depth explanation: they paint a narrative of "bitcoin vs them".

for example, tales from the crypt is hardly distinguishable from other american conservative shows like tucker carlson's or alex jones' - the major difference is that it inserts bitcoin in the middle of issues as the solution that fixes them.

another example is peter mccormack's show, which admittedly is not about bitcoin anymore. but it does dive into politics and follows certain trends that are popular, while also inserting bitcoin into the conversation as a potential solution.

in stephan livera's case, the narrative is more along the lines of "bitcoin vs cbdcs" or "bitcoin vs the fed". it's a tried and true libertarian plot that seems to work since 2011 or so.

other shows also go deep into the "bitcoin vs vc-funded shitcoins" dichotomy, emphasizing on points about immaculate conception while ignoring any possible criticism that can be addressed to bitcoin. it's simply perfect, no point in ever trying to improve anything.

in comparison, i approach topics from the perspective of my own curiosity and explore technical matters in a way that helps me understand them. the approach is selfish, i know. but it also attracts the kind of audience that i like and to which i can relate.

will the bitcoin takeover podcast become political and start following popular mainstream narratives just to attract a wider audience? no, i'm not interested in any of that. but sometimes it's a little bit frustrating to notice that the growth is slower than my expectations. there's definitely an increase in views/downloads all across the board, but it doesn't really go "viral" in the space.

anyway, i'll just keep going and hope that people in the space get smarter and more interested in finding out what's new and/or understanding how some technical aspects work.

now i know what i'm doing wrong, but i'm not sure it's that "wrong".

Maybe but I think the reason I enjoy your podcast is you. And honestly, I think the reason some people don’t enjoy it is also you.

Welcome to Vancouver’s biggest KYC arcade !