Profile: 5a0a2cae...
"Kaspa’s early coins were disproportionately mined by insiders and early contributors. While they claim “fair launch,” the reality is there was no real user demand or widespread access at genesis. That’s a premine." So what? Is bitcoin unfair because of the people who mined it first? Come up with better arguments douche.
"2. Kaspa has no hard cap." False and a straight up lie, Kaspa has a max supply of 28.7 billion coins, that cannot be changed.
probabilistic finality model
"3. It has a probabilistic finality model." Dude Kaspa is 100% secure show me anyone that can get double spent, you fucking can't.
Kaspa will displace Bitcoin and make Bitcoin utterly worthless. Kaspa does solve the trilemma with its pruning method that is the best in any cryptocurrency. Bitcoin is a shitcoin in comparison, Bitcoin to use in any sort of cheap and fast way sacrifices sovereignty I am not interested in using some centralized shit lightning network. The answer to the decentralization problem was always pruning not making the blocks artificially small.
You know jack shit so stop talking about things you know fucking nothing about loser. Go enjoy your shitcoin BTC.