Sorry accidental like of an inane post. Can’t undo it on Nostr! That said, tudo bem?

That the NYT? I can assure you there’s nothing you need in that hollowed-out-to-the-foundations institution

https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/but-my-process-was-good

Fair! But the fascinating thing about the TREE function is that comes from a simple game of sorts, whereas Graham’s number (for example) is built mechanistically. TREE is like evolution, Graham’s like AI. And G(1) is 3 ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑3, but TREE(1) is only 1! Amazing it overtakes it by a mile at 3. I think about that a lot.

https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/invisible-terror

https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/the-aliens

Ha — you do know about this! That’s a big number, but Rayo(10^100) is bigger, albeit a bit of a cheat.

Need to find a better thumbnail than that goofy (though brilliant) mathematician apparently.

TREE(3) vs Graham’s Number: The reason AI will never surpass human creativity. https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/tree3

Ha, no, but I’ve had the same problem. I want to argue about TREE(3) and Graham’s Number, but no one cares.