Avatar
Undisciplined
5d4b6c8d4921146c509e00e0930c3a41f2c81bfc06fa0794cbf7397b8a1c1ee3
Convex combination of Ron Swanson and Britta Perry Cohost of The Stacker Sports Podcast

The post Breton Woods collapse of fiat might actually look pretty rapid to future generations.

Except for all of the Zoomers, Millennials, and most of Gen X, and technically whoever was on the far side of the Earth

Replying to Avatar Cyph3rp9nk

Isn't the global average something like 200,000 sats?

You're doing fine. Stay humble. Stack sats.

Replying to Avatar Finrod Felagund

Like nostr:npub1qfkcklnmes45z75y7y8dkud5yll8vp5eq5ysk9rmgqdxeasv8unsrfj6kq said, a thing can be immoral yet legal. Or vice versa.

If lender and borrower agree, let them be.

But usury remains immoral, since no well informed person would borrow money from his future more than what he’s getting. You’re getting 10 gold coins, your future self is losing 11 gold coins. No one would make that deal, unless the borrower is uninformed, and the lender is exploiting that, and that’s how it becomes immoral.

If you’re a well informed person, you’d be incredibly high time preference to take such loan. But it doesn’t make sense for a well informed person to be this short sighted.

Finally, we’re not arguing to ban loans. Simply saying usury, aka charging interest, is immoral, and I personally would ban usury if I ever get my own kingdom.

P.S.

Only reason usury looks like a good thing in our time is because fiat has distorted our perception of reality. It never was a good thing, and it never will be.

Why is it immoral to want to be paid for use of my money?

When I wanted a new car, I preferred to have the car sooner and pay someone to use the spare capital they had available, than to make do with a car that didn't serve my needs until I saved up enough for an outright purchase.

There's no moral content here. It's just consenting adults with different preferences interacting with each other.

“Person who refuses to research or understand anything about _________ has this to say about __________:”

Unfortunately, that describes a tremendous share of discourse on pretty much any topic. It's a constant effort to curate my feeds to maintain high signal.

Replying to Avatar Nosnevets

Really it would be a repeal of the entire tax and regulatory regime.

By definition, all assets are both scarce and desirable; since that's basically the definition of an economic good and assets are a class of economic goods.