Avatar
Michael Matulef
5d5484c84967aac3986cd512af8dcdd52433d0901adbbb59236011884283aa1e
Know Thyself | Everything Voluntary✌️ | Follow the Tao

The Continuing Mystery of Early 2020 | The Tom Woods Show

https://fountain.fm/episode/BOWILjE6j6lk9zibS7RR

Self-ownership is the only logically and ethically consistent solution to the problem of human ownership, and it is the only one likely to result in peaceful cooperation rather than violent conflict. Self-ownership means an individual has full claim over his own body and time. Once one accepts the premise of self-ownership, a coherent framework for understanding rights, justice, and non-aggression emerges. This principle extends to what a man may produce as a consequence of these choices, i.e., property. Aggression can be understood as the use or threat of violence to control another person's body or time, and any physical aggression against an individual would be a violation of his right to property of himself.

It is difficult to argue against self-ownership and the system of property rights if one understands property rights as the only workable solution to economic scarcity and subjectively values peace and civilization. Any such argument can be seen as transparently self-serving hypocrisy. Rather than an intelligent argument arising from human reason, this argument is nothing more than an appeal that we return to the mores of subhuman animals controlled entirely by their instincts, unable to employ reason. Arguing against self-ownership is effectively arguing against your own personhood, because it makes it clear you cannot respect property rights and cannot be part of a civilized social order. It is a plea to be considered an animal. Although economic theory does not dictate political ideology, understanding economic scarcity and subjectively valuing peace and civilization will incline a person to adopt a libertarian outlook. There are no alternatives to self- ownership that do not result in propagating conflict and engendering enmity and resentment between individuals and groups.

- nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak

There is always the possibility of conflict over contestable (scarce) resources. This is in the very nature of scarce, or rivalrous, resources. By assigning an owner to each resource, the legal or property rights system establishes objective, publicly visible or discernible boundaries or borders that nonowners can avoid.

- Stephan Kinsella

Even if humans were in an imaginary world where everything a person wishes for materializes in front of them immediately, the economic problem would not be solved, as humans' mortality still forces them to economize their scarce time. The economic problem is solved every instant in which a human reasons about their time and makes a choice, only for a new economic problem to emerge in the next instant and force the same human to make another choice. The only final solution to the economic problem is death, the point at which there are no further choices to be made regarding time allocation.

- nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak

The State has taken control of the monetary ledger away from natural law and used that power to facilitate its metastatic growth. Moreover, it has exerted this control as one of its exclusive monopoly privileges. As advocates for free markets, individual property rights, and the right to self-determination nothing is more imperative in our time than separating money from State.

nostr:nevent1qqs8uh9u6ch8t03nrffx89f6d9h0g540pzal2h8rz44n8algtgckpgcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqh25snyyjea2cwvxe4gj47xum4fyx0gfqxkmhdvjxcq33ppg82s7qvzqqqqqqyxade6x

What do prostitutes, blackmailers, slumlords, and Bitcoin miners who censor transactions all have in common?