No. It’s a very simple question. You’re either inclined toward violence or peace. Which one is it?

You say all this but you are clearly pro violence. It’s very weird I don’t understand.

This retard really put thoughts into this?????????

OK PREPER

And then bitch about how the mean menz men won't marry them. 🤣

It is women who constantly get away with misbehavior, not men.

Does anyone have a good used car for sale? I know someone who is in need of a reliable car they can put a child seat into.

The child seat thing is a must.

If you can hook a brother up it'd be appreciated.

as in, is it wrong or off of your context to say it is the result of will? byproduct of will? impact of will?

like intertwined in some way with an energy/force/power thing?

And this is why the British Isles & Europe can't live together & should stop trying, why keep making each other miserable, both need to just stay in their own corner. 😂

Heh, those are just commies playing ideological dressups. 😂

Playing defend the castle when everything has gone to shit & hordes are inbound is a losing proposition, retreat, bide your time & get it back later...

I like this philosophy.

Some threats require neighbours to work together, though.

And while its everyone's right to be a prick, its also everyone's right to prioritise which pricks they stand up for.

And at least two of us in this thread have the training to make good on the or else. 😂

Let me make it simple, leave me the fuck alone & don't steal my shit or else. 😂

Much Libertarian economic theory depends upon everyone except This Property Owner being an NPC in every scenario.

Life isn't a video game, tho. Other humans are also humans and they also have natural rights and agency.

It’s amazing how many libertarians and libertarian adjacent people don’t understand that people don’t process information the same way at a fundamental level. This means that even people who use the NAP to govern their actions will not interpret the NAP the same way in a given situation. So yes. Both sides in a conflict can actually think the other side violated the NAP on them and they are acting in self defense. Both sides. At the same. The chaser? You probably aren’t changing most people’s minds about their interpretation. Especially if their wellbeing is tied to their interpretation.

Nothing stopping you from defending yourself in any situation of course but when you and yours have to bear all the costs win, lose or draw against them and theirs, I hope it was worth it. Especially if your talking about a group local to you. The reality is if someone decides to end you and isn’t a complete moron about it you are done. It’s a rifle shot from 300 yards. Its a ball peen hammer to the back of the skull while you are walking down the street. Don’t forget that the family of the person you self defensed is still in the area and their response will be governed by their interpretation of events. We lose sight of that several generations into a society where the government has power enough to put the kybosh on most of that and people being used to using the state to handle disputes with one another and retaliating for wrongs.

Enemy infiltrating and destroying a place? Nah, never happen... 🤣

Enemy infiltrating and destroying a place? Nah, never happen... 🤣

I don't know why you are surprised that the German government is selling bitcoins stolen by themselves.

This same government has flooded Germany with illegal immigrants.

This same government has given up nuclear energy.

This same government has screwed up security in the streets.

And so on and so on...what they do is normal for them, they always take the option that is most detrimental to national sovereignty and the interest of their citizens.

Heh, it's already over, they just won't admit it.

If it wasn't for Russia's abundant patience they'd be a carpark...