I saw these, will try… they are labeled as “wash” so I thought it was for like medical.

anyone use isopropyl for cleaning electronics? My question is can I store a small amount in a stainless need tip oil bottle? I’ve been looking at pumps but they all have bad reviews, any recommendations there.

I’m conflicted, I want channels where either a group voting mechanism or an admin can say “hey that’s not about upgrading Mac Pros, please keep it on topic” and there are many Facebook/discord groups that are highly valuable resources to me because of this… but I really don’t like when these tools get used for pretty much anything other than technical topic limiting.

rabbit ちゃん占って

this is terribly ambitious

wouldn’t I need to jump through a bunch of corrs hoops to self host a did document, which would be really no different than nip 05? The simplicity is really an illusion of centralized did custodied on bluesky inc severs.

user who’s npub created (first seen on my set of relays) in last 12 hours

notes from people who’s last known event was x days x week or x month ago

A insta like curated photo feed, sans screen shots or memes, this photo is gonna be presented on my profile in a notable way like photos

^ that one worked as I thought it would (it pulled only the p tags from the note you directly replied to) but my test from iris (non-self-hosted) didn’t pull p tags from higher up in the thread, so maybe there is an update for self hosted?

(Aside) Kinda surprised that neither snort or iris has a replying to: module

#[4]​ #[5]

testing a reply from iris

oh yes, didn’t know about this. I like how it sends as 42 so there isn’t random “is this Lana del ray” responses in the kind 1 feeds.

Wish it didn’t have DM’s so it stops constantly asking to decrypt them

tron?

was this rebranded or can I not think of the name of the competitor?

what client are you using that keeps adding p tags back into the thread?

I think you mean cohesive

nostr:note1lnp6ct8r6p7av3hv3luw3qk0c9vsu2x36k3evzxtysphwrq2vt2qtyaa9p

but this thread is really about growth and onboarding and not discoverability.

* Make two posts a day minimum about a topic other than bitcoin

* Hash tag those posts with relevant hash tags and include #grownostr

* Check the #grownostr feed at least once daily and find a new hashtag to follow

* Choose one person from this new tag you have genuine interest in and follow them

* Don’t dm people about this, this is pushy and cringe reminiscent of chain emails

* The next day contribute to the new tag you found and repeat finding another new tag

you know them better than me.

it depends on their prerequisite knowledge of web2, do they remember watching a YouTube video in the timeline of Facebook? Or did they not onboard until after the api’s constricted. If they weren’t early adopters then they won’t be now. At a certain age I default back to the email example.

In this case I might say as you, to see the designs I’ve personally contributed?

This doesn’t encourage people to tag their content in a useful way at all… in fact it’s the exact opposite. This works for plebchain as someone see it and learns about the topic to participate. Participating in grownostr doesn’t grow the number of people attempting to tag content with appropriate tags, it might grow a following from step 3 & 4 but the commonality is that you both want followers, not a shared interest in the tag or an appreciation of the content found in the appropriate tag.

53 minutes ago, she has since posted an update that she was kindly asked to take down this video and complied. she reports these particular books were published 15+ years ago and that’s the criteria for pulling them for *review*

I could speculate on that criteria that the district is trying to kill two birds with one stone by pulling all books past 15 years, and include in their review outdated science text which is a regular practice of schools. She hasn’t shared her district so all we can do is speculate for now. 💁‍♀️

outside real-time events, or fan tags for certain creators (for them to receive user generated content for a specific purpose), it’s been over a decade since hashtags have been useful for discovery. They are great if you want some cheap engagement, but for that reason they also are kinda cringe, a sign of the marketing communications class of 2015 who jumps from client to client building their following, creating a mess of unengaged followers that is then demoted in the algorithm and switching positions to to create that mess again for their next victim.