It simple isnât a V4V model if you are referring to people contributing as âusersâ. This implies a one-sided relationship where individuals are merely passive consumers of a product or service. In the context of a V4V model, the dynamic is more nuanced and collaborative, and it's important to use language that accurately reflects this relationship, if what you are trying to build is a V4V model.
you could add and a free to do all sorts of things on top, but it wouldnât be an underlying blockchain. It would be a fundamentally different protocol or smart contract placed on top of an underlying blockchain, that different protocol could be interoperable.
The UI framework example⌠is a contribution of value towards a larger picture. if youâre not finding value in, or not taking an active role in, v4v wonât work. Itâs in the definition, "framework -
a system of rules, ideas, or beliefs that is used to plan or decide somethingâ if youâre not gaining value from the something than v4v doesnât apply in this instance. I think advocates of v4v would agree that because youâre not taking a long term stake in the something, that a name your price model isnât the right way to go for this unilateral exchange.
long-term investment from both parties. Your investors/producers might lack the technical sophistication, viewing them clueless users doesn't put them in a position of responsibility to stay involved.
In a v4v model, contributions of time and talent lead to deeper and more meaningful relationships between participants in this exchange, these connections extend beyond one-off transactions and can result in more sustainable and loyal investors.
Name your price, doesnât offer the same mutual growth and reciprocity that a v4v proposition has.
The design has to be reciprocal, design the concept of âuserâ out of the network and proposition. Yes someone needs to start and lead the community from an initial contribution of creation, but that creation needs to include the space and necessity and long term commitment to open the door to diverse contributions.
it seems like your concept of v4v is the end user names their price. And this write up is a completely valid critique of the name your price foss model. v4v is rather an entirely different approach from the getgo⌠you donât design for an end user in the v4v model, you have to treat the end user like they are an associate, they are the producer, they are the vc.
It indeed doesnât work for everything.
Youâre kinda missing the concept of time and talent as part of the value that could be contributed. Not fans but producers.
some use the small amount as a spam filter, (the maxis donât like this term but itâs essentially âproof of satsâ) then limit their reading of the âglobalâ or âuniverseâ feeds to just paid read. By paying for write access you show up in these feeds. But most of these relays allow free read access.
will look like this, is also interoperable with activity pub clients like mastodon 
you could turn that into an emoji here (on supporting clients) and do like :bananaunicorn:
I think a twitter user said social media = birds and then picked a big one that ram fast
alby should just have a pop up when you visit primal. I click to the side with that pop up on many sites and it gets lost in a sea of windows.
this is relays connect 7 should be the total, I think there might be a ghost bootstrap in damus so you always have +1 but that might of been removed
can an naddr be a noteid?
there like two system I need to make a info graphic of so I learn all the corollaries
they will never hold a flame to shower girl