I’m not entirely sure what the solution is… nostr currently isn’t good at private or paywalls as of yet. “If and when” relays get hostile towards nsfw content, then yeah. That’s not where we at, and I’m just applying this logic…
nostr:note1za54frrpdwagsuaqq9tulj6gfzpsdx6y853rxf698qvrmhn8cwxspu97mm
They jumped at the chance to drag me for my question about the term but no response to this…
nostr:note1mwpx4ygvpwldhtttwkh54n4xwtwtslemygg6flefvmm5ez7f5uvq8p80n6
nostr:note1e683r6x4v7gr29fs4r2jtz0zqcupyjajt60dklsa48q2x7gdxkcq7zu9rj
nostr:note1e683r6x4v7gr29fs4r2jtz0zqcupyjajt60dklsa48q2x7gdxkcq7zu9rj
The real opportunity here is to reclaim the 20% that the main distribution channel takes from sw’s… just don’t let trendy terms lead astray.
simps abandon their values quick af
nostr:note1mwpx4ygvpwldhtttwkh54n4xwtwtslemygg6flefvmm5ez7f5uvq8p80n6
is the intention the terms of service is protect sw or not? If and when sw gets pushed off other relays… should the solution be centralized? Shouldn’t we be encouraging more self custody of these thing?
ok boomer
nostr:note1yfnjkg0w2lmznmr5d3vx5kzr0sdvl85wypzg3s7u2ykjz8546pcqfw6umy
It just seems y’all missed the last 5 years of the rich music and subculture associated with that term… it’s fine, do you.
The positive embrace of it also doesn’t have anything to do with only fans.
I originally called that page /previousbuilds but the download folder is /sideusbuilds now I’m using previous as just builds… I’m scared to change now if anyone’s bookmarked /previousbuilds 🤣 might rectify this at 1.0
if it’s a refuge for sex workers and those who support that, maybe don’t use a term that at times has been used to slur women participating online as just seeking male attention. Hard thing to balance.
nostr:npub1tltf8es60957eawprkl4ecs2akkpe6n3wgt4tvphj4vef0mqvxasv6ve7g Sideus build 0.6’s link redirects to a 404 page, thought of letting you know in case you are not aware 🤙
fixed
I like the intention, not so sure egirl is exactly what you mean.
I did assume as much, was this a reply on habla it doesn’t appear as a reply on damus.
there is more to it, and disagreements about which way value should flow…
does my zap split to the client that splits to the relay or do I pay for the client and relay, and the clients and relays zap every note they serve. maybe at the short form kind 1 level that’s only .001 msats.
A nostr address service might track which advocate onboarded a new address and price in that referral, or the flow is rather a discount on the service.
v4v does agree that tech should be leveraged to provide proof and peace of mind with flow. If I produce a podcast with 4 hosts, I’m much more likely to contribute 40 bucks if I know that technologically they each directly receive 10. I might readjust that if the mixer and cover artist was getting a percentage. If we just split git commit percentages localization is gonna take the whole cake, so we might need to find better ways of splitting this flow of value amongst associates in software.
Name your price, might work if the real goal of releasing an album is to sell concert tickets. These critiques of name your price is shared between those who are confused between name your price and v4v, and those who advocate v4v.
and then what is long form worth in comparison. I’m more for the later, I want to promote and encourage the use of the client that I paid for, but there is the view that short form is fleeting and isn’t valued like a hour long podcast or a 30 minute video.
A nostr address service might track which advocate onboarded a new address and price in that referral, or the flow is rather a discount on the service. v4v does agree that tech should be leveraged to provide proof and peace of mind with flow. If I produce a podcast with 4 hosts, I’m much more likely to contribute 40 bucks if I know that technologically they each directly receive 10.
Name your price, might work if the real goal of releasing an album is to sell concert tickets, and these critiques of name your price is shared between those who are confused between name your price and those who advocate v4v.
And v4v might not work in all places but I see a lot of critique of v4v that is simply a correct critique of name your price, but is a misunderstanding of the long term commitment and relationship building that is v4v. Leveraging tech is the ultimate goal, but most of the successful examples of v4v to date are just leveraging linguistics.
I lost all faith when #bluesky shipped mute lists but didn’t think to back up a step and ship list lists
wait they still don’t have gif 🤦♀️
nostr:note1r4unyk7vtqwauan0cmgn9lqupse7v77a2g25guvu9zjpqndz869scfg7kq
do I just go to your snort instance or is there a second step or not quite ready for me to poke around