nostr:npub102ca8pnhy26vh2akepgr4vleyew65nuzug5val3sycslfe0wruwqzezyfp imagine a flying pig with brightly coloured wings and huge tusks soaring above London.
nostr:npub102ca8pnhy26vh2akepgr4vleyew65nuzug5val3sycslfe0wruwqzezyfp imagine a marble statue of three spiders embracing like the three graces, with a Bitcoin sun rising above them.
Welcome to Nostr! nostr:npub1dllf8wmj6jk83r7chck6madmfgh3fges65ctpe5t6ueujazvvcvsh20tz5
Zapvertising on Nostr: All Your Models Are Broken
Bitcoin vencerá a las CBDC
https://www.laoccidental.es/por-que-bitcoin-vencera-a-las-cbdc/
An EUA does not magically move time forward and transform a new experimental treatment into a time-tested treatment. Neither time nor science work that way.
Exception to the above: govt. officials that implemented mandates should face criminal liability.
Mandating an experimental (by definition!) medication is criminal. A clear violation of the Nuremberg code.
As to justice... I favour a public investigation and class action lawsuits similar to those the tobacco industry faced. Fines. Civil liability.
Nuremberg2 seems extreme unless very bad faith can be proven.
Of course I don't want to ignore incentives, they matter a lot. They play into the cover up. Nobody wants to admit their mistakes, especially if it could lead to liability.
But for people to want to stifle debate they don't need to be part of a shadowy cabal...
So yeah, there is a wide spectrum of valid opinion between anti-vaxxers and "safe and effective" propagandists.
My favourite Ockham's razor:
Incompetence plus cover up > Conspiracy
It works for Chernobyl, Lockdowns...
The fact that Sweden never vaccinated < 12 yrs.
...and many other countries later followed suit, is a tacit admission that the math did not add up.
Given the negligible risk of covid in 0-19 age group...
The vaxx had a very high bar to clear for risk-benefit to be positive.
Investigation that should be given maximum publicity and transparency given the glaring conflict of interest involved.
Combined with this from EUROMO...
It calls for a serious investigation and debate.
That's less than 4 months after NEJM published the preliminary results originally on November 9, 2021. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2116298
Less than a month before the trial was scheduled to conclude!
If caused by the vaxx, that would put serious adverse effects at 1 in 1514 (who received 2 doses).
In the clinical trial itself!
I'm sure this is not the full story. But maybe it does call for further investigation.
That's less than 4 months after NEJM published the preliminary results originally on November 9, 2021. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2116298
Less than a month before the trial was scheduled to conclude!
No serious adverse effects were recorded in either group...
But then in February 2022 we learn that a certain Maddie de Garay was in it...
"Upon receiving her second dose on January 20th... Maddie developed severe abdominal and chest pain"
This was the Pfizer children vaxx trial: NCT04816643 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643
11109 participants. Phase 2-3 are the most sigificant, because of number and placebo control.
1528 received vaxx
757 placebo
This was the Pfizer children vaxx trial: NCT04816643 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643
I will zap ⚡️ AI generated art inspired by Heinlein's #TheMoonIsAHarshMistress sci-fi novel.