Look. It's been like 3 years... Surely you can eventually make an exception for one dog...
Back when I had a functioning LN node (umbrel) I just used the NWC app. Made connecting to nostr clients super easy.
That said, if your running CLN or another implementation, I don't know if NWC is as easy to use as I don't really have experience there.
Yo! Thrilled to have found your podcast! I'll be following!
https://fountain.fm/episode/sgDYGdIRcRFPrPUhGM7N
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxquqzp89d7s9k5h02sha4la38rhke3c2006akhwzv97vwcdaglua99le89nwsl7
There's a reason I have chosen to remain a nym so far.
Even if I end up being wildly successful, I don't want to feel pressured to "perform" my life as someone who is wildly successful.
I'm just here, doing my thing. No amount of money will change that.
Testing ecash payments with bearer tokens stored on a physical card. You can see the card being topped up with one phone and pay the other. It feels incredibly fast and smooth.
Tap to pay UX with ecash is as good as it gets for payments. You're literally handing over the money.
https://video.nostr.build/41b9c7bb2306a6b21249a80f1e4d986b4c5663df3f9c60e8fc84ba33abf2ca46.mp4
Can we play with it yet?
Instead of updating that article, I just made a new one about #GetOnZero where I detail the theory, lay out a few different strategies for different liquidity environments, and share the details of my current workflow.
It's live!
I love this idea. Ties in well with WOT concepts.
Additionally, id like to see this software signer take the form of an open source app that would work across any exchange or service that supports it.
Think something like Amber or nos2x, but for Bitcoin keys (obviously never for single-sig).
The app would also house configuration files for the multisig wallets it contains keys to, and would reject any attempt add additional keys from the same multisig as a security measure.
There will always be a place in the market for companies to hawk their specialized secure hardware signing devices to the "paranoid crypto anarchists", but we shouldn't let our individual willingness to pay for hardware solutions quiet our demand for better security models for new entrants to the space who aren't going to buy dedicated hardware immediately.
Damn it. Now I might have to write an article about this...
I'm not sure if it would be profitable from a business perspective, but I'd like to see different multisig-as-a-service models.
Imagine a Bitkey-esque solution, but where instead of needing to buy a new hardware device, Bitkey holds a key, the app on your phone holds a key, and a trusted contact holds a third.
Imagine if exchanges embraced multisig for their clients, but in a shared custody model that didn't require new entrants to the space to purchase new hardware...
This is the correct take.
Multisig everything, but solve for the difficulty on the design side.
As a non-dev, I often overlook the "just make it better" solution. Lol.
The only reason I don't agree, is because I think a distributed multisig setup is a lot to ask of someone who just bought their first 100k sats.
Like anything in Bitcoin, security should be a journey that grows as your gain conviction.
This isn't to say that I didn't set up a distributed multisig for my early sats, but I think it's a bit to ask of someone who is brand new.
Anyone who holds >5% of their net worth in sats, and has been here for over a year should definitely be exploring multisig though.
Meanwhile, I'm told I'm left, center, right, or far right depending on who I'm talking to...
...and I guess Saylor would call me a paranoid crypto anarchist...
Funnily, time would actually pass faster on Pluto as time is slowed by the presence of gravity.
Pluto, having much less mass and thus gravity than earth, and experiencing less gravity from the sun due to its extreme distance, would actually experience faster time. Imperceptibly faster, but measurably faster.
