Not yet. Trying to get there. Wish I had the conviction I have now. Better yet I should have listened to Max Keiser back when I first heard about Bitcoin on Alex Jones's show. I'd be a freaking billionaire.
Well the way THEY currently have their network setup they do need their shitcoin (OXEN) as it is what allows the nodes that route sessions messages to join their network, however I agree the technology they created with session & lokinet could be ported and modified to be coinless or use bitcoin as the coin to incentivize the nodes that route the traffic. It would probably require a pay as you use type incentivized structure and would need to be either a sidechain or layer off the bitcoin network. Incidently it is their shitcoin that is holding their technology back too because it has no value proposition.
Thanks for the insight! I finally understand how to change the zap amount too.
- Press and hold zap button to set your amount of sats
- Single press to zap (your preselected amount)
or
- Double Press to zap (your preselected amount) with a message
CSW is attacking all open source development. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/jack-dorseys-bitcoin-legal-defense-fund-prepares-for-tulip-trading-case
Faketoshi's a joke. Need to add him to those clownworld tweets.
Learn about Spacechains here: https://vimeo.com/703246895/d89aba6e56
Experience them in first person here: https://github.com/fiatjaf/soma
To me I don't see the need for burning bitcoin to create the space chain token or locking bitcoin to give to miners at a future date like he mentions?? (don't quite understand the mechanics of how that would work). Rather why not just lock the bitcoin in a multisig wallet whereby the only way that bitcoin could be released is to burn the space chain token.
https://www.weforum.org/videos/this-start-up-catches-waste-methane-to-power-data-centres
„Mobile modular data centers“ 👀
Well if you look at history, the globalists have often funded both sides in a opposing conflict. For them it's all about control. So they play both sides to have an element of control on both sides.
It's clear that for the network to scale a method of monetization definitly needs to be implemented. Once that happens I think we'll see an explosion of relays
It always was taboo before. Now with this younger generation getting brain washed in the schools it's no longer. The ironic thing is, the snowflakes think communism is so great, but if they can't hack a free capitalist society then they really won't be able to hack a communist one.
Yea ... if you think about it. Anything that uses a distributed P2P architecture has to give a little credit to the grandaddy that started it all and that's Napster. Before Napster no one ever thought of P2P distribution. It was really revolutionary.
https://schiffgold.com/commentaries/thomas-jeffersons-blueprint-for-handling-the-national-debt/
I've always enjoyed peter schiff's insights and I acknowledge that he is one of the main people who opened my eyes a long time ago to the problems with our monetary system. His book "How an economy grows and why it crashes" is so simply explained that a grade schooler could read and understand it. It's just too bad he doesn't have a complete understanding of bitcoin's value yet. I think it will come, but will further down the road.
Very true. We are still early!
I agree 💯. I mean the amount of immediate buzz and rapid collaboration around this protocol has the same feeling as those other tech landmarks. I think it's the start of using public/private encrypted key pairs in a decentralized platform other than creating a new shitcoin platform to go with it.


