Coming back to this because the op’s reasoning is faulty. Censorship resistance doesn’t guarantee your reach. I’m assuming that is what he is pissy about. As long as you can always run your own relay, the protocol is censorship resistant.

If people use my relay for illegal stuff, am I on the hook?

Having too many nodes from different projects scattered about... Relatable?

This place is fun, 90’s internet fun.

For anyone who has zapped me, I see you, and I appreciate you.

hot take: I get that custodial lightning is not remotely decentralized, sovereign, trustless, etc. - all that good shit …

… but is nobody else outrageously excited by how much of an improvement over fiat it is? not just in its own right but even explicitly in terms of decentralisation, sovereignty, and trustlessness?

it strikes me as a key vector of bitcoin driving jurisdictional arbitrage, for one. say some authoritarian regime cracks down on bitcoin (whatever that ends up meaning in practice, doesn’t really matter) and makes it politically risky to run a node, or manage liquidity, or be seen as “transmitting money”, or whatever. if there is a trustworthy custodial lightning provider *literally anywhere in the world* you can anonymously spin up the ability to receive payments in seconds. “anonymously” and “in seconds” are both groundbreaking advances if you have any familiarity whatsoever with fiat banking and payment rails.

if you think about it, you actually can’t get this with “real” lightning either. it’s not instant (to set up) and you need to know people who presumably trust you to some small extent to get to the point of workable liquidity and stay there (perhaps under-discussed, but if channel partners “don’t trust you”, they will close or never open, and you can’t use lightning at all. WhO’s TrUsTlEsS nOw HuH?!?)

so yes, this requires trust, but like, fuck me, so does everything in real life 😂 - being overly negative on this strikes me as a kind of core fallacy of appreciating open and decentralized systems: that it’s a spectrum, not a binary. how open and decentralized the foundation is represents the maximum openness and decentralisation of anything built on top, *not the minimum*!

moving away from completely closed and centralised does not necessitate the opposite, it opens up an entire range of new possibilities, all of which come with tradeoffs. but tradeoffs are relative to circumstances in real life, and in real life, selective trust is very much a thing because We LiVe In A sOcIeTy 🤪 - talking about tradeoffs in absolute terms as if the decision to accept them can be made entirely devoid of context is highly regarded. and this isn’t even to get into the rather obvious line of argument that if you want people to ever get to the extreme, having a spectrum to gradually move along is far more appealing than requiring them to jump in at the deep end. i.e. it’s also amazing for adoption.

in conclusion, don’t be highly regarded. support adoption. agree with my hot take. gm, pv 🤙

Most of you wouldn't recognize me in person.

Real estate prices in Ontario are holding up quite well considering high rates. Demand is actually fairly robust.

It will be interesting to see if this continues, as prices have skyrocketed in the last decade and many have called for a crash due to higher mortgage rates.

Debasement kills the working class and in the absence of a dollar that holds its value over time, assets are monetized beyond their utility value. This creates a wealth gap between asset owners and labourers working paycheque to paycheque.

If real estate prices hold or turn up it would be a very strong signal that Bitcoin adoption will accelerate amongst those who’ve feel left behind.

🟣🟠🏡

Thoughts?