Personal and societal censorship are essentially the same from a moral perspective. The only difference is scope & consequence, which are irrelevant to a moral perspective. The fundamental act and its moral principles are the same.
If you simply ignore anything you disagree with, you will quickly find that you have passive aggressively removed those people from your society. The only real difference from taking them out back and having them shot is that you sleep better at night. Either way, they are still ostracized to extinction.
That's just willfully delusional.
You need some negativity in your positive reinforcement bubble.
I aint clickin that shit nigga.
Violence is a physiological need.
The layoffs have not gone far enough. Still huge numbers of completely useless people being employed and allowed to eat.
I will send 5000 zaps to the first person who can send me video proof of them paying their rent with zaps.
So are my farts, doesn't mean shit.
>paying people to reply to your dumb post
"NOOO MY EXPERIENCE ISN'T CURATED ENOUGH NOOOO I CANT HANDLE RAW INTERNET NOOOOOOOOO I NEED IT TO BE SANITIZED NOOOO"
There is no more negative force on earth than an exclusively positive person.
I'm not buying a cheeseburger because I want to "support" the burgermonger. I'm buying a cheeseburger because I want a cheeseburger.
>supporting creators
Unless someone is your child or elderly parent, you should not be "supporting" them. Buy products you like as transactions. The "support" model has turned every business it touches into a parasocial hellscape.
It really can't.
Both of those professions are completely soul-draining and you will be nothing but an utterly thoughtless technician.
I would still be using Twitter if your faggot ass hadn't banned me for calling a prostitute "Whore."