Avatar
dshf
64c2faf91950b9df9c719cd02c556b20bb3eb9a5d012fea6a88ce2cd315db496
Dutch Shaeferโ€™s Humble Fan Heat punk ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค˜ Node runner

Letโ€™s be honest. So EU Members of Parliament from her party were stealing money. Something like several milions EUR by paying other party members for nonexistent works. She was not directly involved as court stated but she should have supervised her staff thus the verdict. Probably she knew all. Money was for her party. USAID would not pay.

Everything fine? Fine?

Fuck yeah! Just remember that when you are from the left side you would not face the same consequences. For mainly the same there was some guy, leader of left wing party which was not convicted because โ€œhe might not have knownโ€.

Remember about our beloved Christine Lagarde. She also was left free.

So Marine was doing the same shitty stuff like other politicians stealing public money but she was not from the rulling club.

But democracy is safe.

๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿ–•

Left, right, I do not care

Steal public money. Go to jail.

Fuckers

Transaction fees will never support block creation in place of the block rewards.

Bitcoin's value growth will exceed expectations and make it necessary to introduce a regularly occurring decimal shift with increased division very soon.

Satoshi even suggested this could one day occur (see attached image) and in the code included the limit of only up to 64 halvings being allowed, even though the math of current divisibility means we can't have more than 32 halvings.

It is likely the network will fork within the next decade into one that divides further and one that doesn't, with possibly no other major changes.

This need for increased divisibility will be clear when Satoshi's reach ยข/Sat parity in the next few years. IMO consensus will be found for adding a function to increase all balances by 10 with every halving, including a 1 time adjustment to add a 0 for every halving that's already occurred since network creation. If this were to occur by the 2028 halving, than we would have added five 0s to the network after that date. One Sat today would be worth ten thousand Sats tomorrow. This would effectively gives a "Coin split" and make the network easier to work with in small amounts while maintaining the current ratio of balances between users.

We can keep the meaning of 1 Bitcoin = 1 21 millionth of the whole network, thus maintaining the โ™พ๏ธ/21 million aspect of Bitcoin's scarcity narrative, but we can increase the number of Satoshi's each Bitcoin contains within it to maintain usability over the long term.

This would also help us naturally shift towards thinking in Sats over Bitcoins, as the number of sats you own would multiply by 10 every 4 years while the fraction of a Bitcoin would be unchanged.

โ˜ฎ๏ธ๐Ÿงกโ‚ฟ

*Not an April fools joke*

I disagree with the first statement. Iโ€™d rather say I donโ€™t know. Moreover the miner might find other incentives in cooperation with other businesses to offset some of reduction in income from block reward. For example like now with energy producers or houshold heating.

Bitcoin ecosystem is evolving like living organisms. Hard to prodict the future paths.

Secondly, what 1 cent will even mean in the future? Would we still use it as denominator?

Iโ€™m afraid to open a fridge โ€™coz now I can see Cashu everywhere.

Good work Zeus!

๐Ÿซก

Yippee-Ki-Yay!

๐Ÿ‘

I really like to see those and hope we will see them ever more often.

I think that it is really fantastic that ECB will be implementing it soon at the anniversary of the great October revolution. Firstly, the date is obvious. Secondly, all ECB projects turn into shit. Hopefully this will be visible warning for the people.

I know I sound too optimistic but I need some good vibes.

๐Ÿ˜Ž

Replying to Avatar GLACA

Gm

Iโ€™m doing my part.

๐Ÿซก

Ok but would it be effective censorship?

Assume there is transaction that Gov want Foundry not to include in the block. So Foundry excludes it from its mempool but some other miner eventually mines it. Then Foundry starts building on block prior to that and maybe is lucky to find the block and another so it wins but the game is not over. Someone else again finds the block and Foundry does not manage to find the next one. Ok it might have that luck to build on block -2 and find 3 blocks in a row and build chain with more proof of work, or not.

The point is this game is risky for Foundry as it is risking resources and might also fail. Would miners be that happy to allocate their hashrate there? Maybe some would leave. What if 10% leaves because they are not affraid.

If 3 biggest pools are forced to censor transactions then they have mbigger chances to win but still it is game of probabily.

This is a game and it is not lost untill the ball is at play. Have some faith in pleb with Bitaxes.

๐ŸคŒ

Replying to Avatar BitPopArt

Great! Is BitAxe a Guardian Angel?

๐Ÿ‘

She can read only what she is given to read and paid for.

GM

Anything invented after youโ€™re 50 is fucking black magic and Satanโ€™s tool to destroy the world.

๐Ÿซก