La «ironía, la radiación, el intelecto» son de corto plazo, no importa cuantos compongan su eco, no son más que eso. Uno de los errores extendidos es el confundir lo indispensable con lo superior, cuando lo superior es menos dependiente.

Primero la simultaneidad y luego la sucesión: ¿hay un sentido oculto en el giro que si no respetamos este orden terminamos viviendo infinitamente a contrapelo?

Inspiration, also when produced by drugs, is a «fantastic» and playful state, a broader range state in the same spectrum-a higher % of the spectrum. But something similar is what happens in the imago, aren't those wings a greater freedom, an ability similar to inspiration: isn't it the same physical phenomenon but in different circumstances?

The wings with which the insect flies after having emerged from the imago are a fantasy present in the interregnum. «Perhaps energy not only is not created or destroyed, it also is not transformed»; the dawn and the dusk occur simultaneously, being transformation and succession the typical superstition of a partial perspective.

Mathematics is valuable in order not to lose convenience in the transition.

He who has ability feels that he knows; that feeling is knowledge.

The separation between appearance and content is a prejudice of those who are short of time.

The road to death is a reflection in the mirror, of death becoming life.

Without equality there is no practice.

To create is as much to figure experiences as to experience figures. The unique remains implicit and explicit, is the content, according to the fact that it did not begin and does not end.

Irony is insidious, it is more «of drama than tragedy», more of pleasure than of «amor fatí»: it is superficial to highlight defects that others overlook.

Expressing completely is the result of repeating logic.

The end serves to multiply from the beginning.

El fuego es más aforístico que sistemático.

Fire is more aphoristic than systematic.

The unique thing is the main thing and the definitive equality.

We see from the world what we carry and we use the world to «see-carry» ourselves.

The end and the beginning are at least equal and at most the same.

Today humanity is at a stage in its journey where it confuses convenience with focus. This sentence is an example of this, since in reality we have always had this problem and besides this is not only a problem. The drawback actually might just be in confusing «when» it's not convenient to do it. Perhaps things are also accelerated just «when and where» they are about to settle down, we return to the same thing over and over again more and more quickly, confusing it until it ends up being established. One thing does not take away from the other, the parts are convenient.

Transparency is the negative of presence.