Quizás el valor del conocimiento no es para distinguir, sino para no distinguir. Para dejar de darle a esto o aquello un énfasis exagerado. Dándole a cada cosa el lugar que le corresponde, incluyendo el que le corresponde a nuestras limitaciones, recuperamos o no perdemos la ponderación equivalente de transparencia que se preserva en la realidad no importa en cuántas partes se la divida.

The maximum value of the consensus is limited and contained in the caste.

This is what modern culture is experimenting with and redefining the bases: it wants to answer this question: what is the limit of consensus?

Hence the double light with which the new generations illuminate these groups, both positively and negatively.

The increase in drug use is also related to this: what is established is a set of emerging orders, of new groups that make up society, and these, in the transitional stage (titanism), that is, while they are executed in haste, do not yet result as capital giving interests, but for now, they remain Dionysian and surreal.

Lo surreal en la práctica es un interés compuesto ejecutado a las apuradas.

The geometric point is a natural son of Euclid, but an adopted son for most mathematicians or scientists.

Lo negativo es errarle al sentido en el infinito.

Free will is the illusion of control that results from following or not following what we do not control.

La imagen, necesaria para la duración de algo en la tierra, la provee más la semilla que el órgano, de ahí que Nietzsche haya hablado bien del «vivir peligrosamente». No es tanto que el órgano no esté en peligro, es que la semilla «se encuentra a sí misma en círculos más amplios».

Great solutions are achieved in an unconscious experimentation with the problem, trying hypothetical rungs and scaffolds as a means to an end, until suddenly a complete solution appears, motivating us to act.

Hay cosas que hacés sin esfuerzo, y con esfuerzo sería para vos imposible hacerlas. De esta experiencia vienen dichos como «en el interior todo está hecho». Hacés el amor y un hijo, pero te sería imposible concebirlo de manera matemática-esotérica; no podemos unir esos puntos con la conciencia, es un talento innato. Lo mismo ocurre con el entendimiento; buenos pensadores reconocen cuánto de su inteligencia es original e inconsciente. Sugiero que lo mismo describen los físicos al contrastar mecánica cuántica (innato) y clásica (conciencia).

With technology we have been replacing the slavery of people with the slavery of death. Humanism.

La exhibición se paga con la heroicidad: como lo hizo Heracles, como lo hacen el sepulturero o el desollador, o con la marginalización.

The phenomenon that physicists call "quantum decoherence" is the same phenomenon that Nietzsche describes as the error of "leaving an action lying in the gutter afterwards" and "as the inability not to react". One has to believe oneself to be a child of God to claim that one is not quantum.

Gravity results from the formula by extraction of the clarity in mystery.

Dogmatism is how the psychic affects the physical, it makes one affect oneself. In its sick aspect it is a Stockholm Syndrome, and how the psychic harms the physical. There is nothing against the psychosomatic, the mental power of humanity is genial, what is fucked up is the constraint being taught (and then self-inflicted) by the worst of others.

As we have limits, the relative is absolute.

The difference between science and superstition is that the former does not skip any steps. This is not something minor, since it is what also differentiates reality from dreams. Dreams are more chaotic, they are more parabolic, their story takes more jumps than those of reality, and learning the steps in between those jumps is what transforms them into reality.

History travels the world at a different speed than potential.

In the full presence of history there are still shortcomings, as with the full presence of sight there are still missing senses

Knowing is «an attempt», a type of creating that gives itself airs of being god, and in this attempt has conquered many things of late for the humankind.

"Know yourself."

When a pleasant suspicion is confirmed, does decoherence occur to a lesser extent?

The distinction between the coherence of a suspicion and decoherence is exaggerated.

«The cat» is never «alive or dead»—it's a superposition of both states.

Many «theological scientists» would change their perspective if they suspected with Nietzsche that «the living is another form of the dead».

Note from 5/5/2024:

In a two-halves system (50/50), each half has a 50% transparency.

If this system alternates its position (first one half on top and then the other), an observer will notice no variation.

Does this calibrates the observer problem in physics?, that of measurement and the wave-particle duality interpretation, as «someone in free fall justifies the equivalence principle, in fact, could they be the same problem on the path toward quantum gravity?