Use of fidelity bonds in pathcoin PoC affects UX. Are there any alternative ways to make it secure?
Cc: nostr:npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7
How encrypted channels would work in joinstr and help against DoS attacks:
https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/3620499
Let me know if you see anything that could be improved.
500 USD bounty for implementing encrypted channels in joinstr
Opportunity for nostr developers to build a better bitcoin dev mailing list
https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2023-10-31#979591
Crowdfunding campaign for joinstr on nostr:npub1kmwdmhuxvafg05dyap3qmy42jpwztrv9p0uvey3a8803ahlwtmnsnhxqk9
I love when people ask something to be censored on a "censorship resistant" network
Here is an example.
Participant 0 sent the coin (value 100k sats) to Participant 1 with a file. They validated it, and the fidelity bond.
Then Participant 0 illegally spent the pathcoin:
https://mempool.space/signet/tx/7389220f82b9fc4a1db3d219373a13e6b50d267885361fa5a0901db3e09fb3b8
Then, P1 noticed, and broadcast the first stage penalty:
https://mempool.space/signet/tx/17959099cd0f3dbf47e9e233ce2eee60cda7815e1735c837b588c5753bdc23c1
Look at P2TrScript under 'Details' to see how OP_CTV as OP_NOP4, is used. Then, the second stage penalty was broadcast, which sent it to P1's wallet:
Worked first time! After testing 1000 times on regtest 😄
(Btw i forgot to update the CTV blockheight from regtest, but whatever.)
Awesome
Is there a way to set kind number while publishing events?
First is created by python-nostr library and second is created by https://snowcait.github.io/nostr-playground/
Only the second is stored by relay wss://supertestnet.nostr1.com
I think there is something wrong with python-nostr library because I tried creating the first event from snocait playground and it worked
Cc: nostr:npub108kuptq55xrxqc8ttfjqwwhkh7ruur7d3drm2yyp8ul9t86w9g0s3v9usw
First is created by python-nostr library and second is created by https://snowcait.github.io/nostr-playground/
Only the second is stored by relay wss://supertestnet.nostr1.com
Should these 2 events be considered same by nostr relays?
Cc: nostr:npub108kuptq55xrxqc8ttfjqwwhkh7ruur7d3drm2yyp8ul9t86w9g0s3v9usw
Funny, while looking up info about coinpool, I was reminded of joinpool, found Harding's writeup on optech here: https://gist.github.com/harding/a30864d0315a0cebd7de3732f5bd88f0
which referred to a discussion by gmax on IRC here:
https://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-05-21.log
... only to discover that I was the guy he was discussing it with, and I had 100% forgotten having that conversation 😆
Do you think coinpool/paymentpool can improve coinjoin?
Free speech is stoppable on Nostr. Why? Because devs continue to allow adult profiles to be reported and thereby suppressed from being seen.
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z admitted it himself tonight on NOSTR that hed rather have pale face dented head drooling cuck prudetards control my destiny because they do not want to see boobs.
They only choice that a person that reports my nudity should get is the option to block me or unfollow me. They should not control my speech or my fate because they are afraid of nudity for have some savior complex to control my speech.
We should all REPORT nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z posts so he gets a taste of his own censorship.
Stop using amethyst app. Use another app. Primal also has an android app.
cli, web app and electrum plugin are already built
plans to build an android app
joinstr is a protocol and others can build different clients that follow the same protocol