Right, i imagine them accessing an account on it with their pwd, credential.
Lol not smart enough 😄
Seriously though, these models are fairly dumb and even somewhat dangerous, as they always sound extremely eloquent and confident, even when wrong. But they can take away a lot of boring work!
Current best open source alternative to chatgpt? (paid is fine, though I'm sure there are a ton of nuances to consider)
#asknostr
On a terminal/screen the vendor controls?
I'm saying that the payer has internet access at that moment via the payee. With credit cards there's still a network access, just a private network.
I don't think it speaks directly to an issue with malware and hardware wallets generally; they had some kind of custom procedure for authorising transactions which got sent to a HW in the background, from what it says there (the medium link 404s so I'm just going on what's reported in cointelegraph). It sounds like the transactions did actually trigger warnings but in the software layer above the HW? Anyway details, basically this was not an attack on HW unless the article is completely wrong?
These things are very common.
Two things to bear in mind are: most of the sophisticated L2/defi stuff happening has ultimate control/backdoor on supposedly decentralized smart contracts, through a multisig key. As in this case. Which means a central point of failure that can be attacked, albeit it takes considerable effort on the attacker's part.
Two: absent external attackers, there's still a lot of danger in this model: like an ecash mint, the multisig quorum members can walk off with the funds *or fake an external attack*. And they can also lose the system's funds just because of an error.
rekt.news was reporting like 4 or 5 events of this type per week in the 22-23 period.
Short version is, (much) better privacy, better TPS, lower cost. But there's a ton to unpack here, like what we imagine a bitcoin bank even is.
More concretely, using phoenix e.g. is not only not a pain, it's exceptionally easy and convenient. For those who can't use it, refer to my OP which addresses precisely that point, also!
See my other reply to exactly this same comment 😄
Wow. I could not even figure it out after seeing your reply. Had to recreate it on lichess https://lichess.org/analysis/k7/p4p2/4pK2/1Rp2p2/2Q5/1P6/8/8_w_-_-_0_1?color=white
This one isn't actually too hard. The key point is black has essentially no moves. So you just have to consider what happens when he makes each of the pawn moves he has available. Each one opens up a square for the white queen to give a check (that are actually mate, because the king has no squares). a6, e4, d5, c8 if the rook is taken.
Curious about something: is nostr active in China rn? I know it was some point.
CCP + GFW( + DPI) has always been the final boss of uncensorability 😄
No, that misses nuance. You can be self custodial of keys but use infrastructure so that you have to trust others on privacy, for example. From merchant side it's more complex but decent tradeoffs have been developed there, too.
You can make the argument that self custodial bitcoin full stop (i.e. not LN specific) is not viable for genpop, that is a real argument with some basis but it definitely isn't an argument that it shouldn't exist as an option, of course.
The sentiment of this post and the replies seems to have become pretty much consensus - "sadly LN just isn't practical for every day life". This is just wrong actually; and sadly this goes to confirm the story that was told to outsiders by silicon valley VCs for years to pump their bags : 'bitcoin isn't useful, nobody ever uses it LN is a joke'. In this comment on reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/lightningnetwork/comments/1fxmokx/when_do_you_think_lightning_will_go_mainstream/lrl42tk/ I give the reality: when bitcoin is not persecuted, LN works and thrives (albeit it remains fairly niche - but that's fine!), and it's a *much* better payment system than you think. The idea that it's not practical for ordinary businesses because they have to balance channels is a perspective that lacks nuance; this is not 2018-2020! It's far easier than you might think, again ABSENT MASSIVE PERSECUTION, to actually use LN in commerce, nowadays.
(Btw in that reddit thread i missed some other uses, like flights ... even $1000 payments are fine on LN nowadays.)
I am getting the same in el salvador- but only on mobile, on laptop it's working fine it seems.
Yeah to be fair there is something implicit, i.e. that the prediction is 'who would be president', or more generally, a binary outcome, not 'what will be the final distribution of votes as a percentage'. I don't know how prediction markets for outcomes like that work, it's obviously more complicated then.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/assets/btc/decode-transaction
seems like it does decoderawtransaction for you.