Avatar
Betelgeuse
6830c4094f42a138b333157c130a5353b4149cc683e2c18c6e004e22ff17c655
History Enthusiast, Content Creator, and thinks he knows something about IT!

I watched "The Passion of the Christ" when it was released. I didn't understand it well at that time. So, I am rewatching it again tonight.

#AMovieADay

Strands #420

β€œSleep tight”

πŸŸ‘πŸ”΅πŸ”΅πŸ”΅

πŸ”΅πŸ”΅

Wordle 1,408 5/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨

🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜

🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

The story-telling method from Frank Daniel school - "Eight-sequence structure" is well utilized in this new movie in #prime - "Veera Dheera Sooran - Part 2". The name itself is kind of suspense. Because even if the name says "Part 2", this is the first part released in this story.

There are 8 shorter plots which has their own mini climaxes. The setup done in a plot will be resolved in another plot. In total, there will be 8 setups, 8 conflicts and 8 resolutions.

A beautiful way of telling a gripping story. For cinephiles in #Nostr, if you want to get a feel of the South Indian movies that has kind of a perfect blend of good content + a bit of over the top action, I would suggest this movie.

Note: For Nostriches from the western hemisphere- #Bollywood - (#Hindi movies) is the movie industry started in #Bombay (#Mumbai), that has the stereotypical 'la la la' rain dance songs and mustache-less heroes. #Telugu movies (#Tollywood) are mostly over-the-top action where Newton and Einstein will probably commit suicide. #Malayalam movies (#Mollywood) is made with a miniscule budget with minimal over-the-top action and mostly content oriented movies. And then comes one of the best - #Tamil movies (#Kollywood - named after #Kodambakkam - a movie town in the city of Chennai down south), has the best of all the industries. A good blend of class, and mass elements.

Good morning, #Nostriches! Happy #Zappurday!

#Saturday #Zappurday

Strands #419

β€œFace time”

πŸ”΅πŸ”΅πŸ”΅πŸ”΅

πŸŸ‘πŸ”΅

Wordle 1,407 3/6

🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜

🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Watched this movie- "Boss Level".

A nice movie. It has that x-factor of #Maanaadu. But better.

#AMovieADay

πŸŽ™οΈ

History isn’t written by the comfortable.

It’s carved out by dreamers, rebels, and the ones who never waited for permission.

In The Age of Reform, ordinary Americans stood up against power β€” for freedom, justice, and dignity.

Maybe we are still standing up today, in our own ways.

I’m sharing their stories β€” one voice, one feed, one block at a time.

Find the latest episode on Fountain: https://fountain.fm/show/NFLClNGodO7LKgvAanZm

History remembers the ones who powered the change. ⚑

#Podcast #History #AgeOfReform #DecentralizeEverything

🚨 New episode: The Age of Reform

Abolition, women’s rights, education reformβ€”the bold battles that reshaped America before the Civil War.

🎧 Tune in here: https://url.thaliyal.com/r6YI6a

#Podcast #History #Abolition #Reform

Strands #418

β€œIt's in the stars”

πŸ”΅πŸ”΅πŸŸ‘πŸ”΅

πŸ”΅πŸ”΅πŸ”΅

Wordle 1,406 4/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜

⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Replying to Avatar vnprc

TL;DR you are not thinking adversarially.

All centralized systems fail over a long enough time frame. So the question is not "will this arrangement fail?". The questions to be asking are "when will it fail?" and "what form will this failure take?".

Bitcoin is positioned to disrupt the strongest tool of control that national governments have: the money printer. Do you think they will just roll over and let it happen? I'm not naive, when people (or organizations run by people) get backed into a corner they get real nasty. We are still in the nice phase. Nasty is yet to come.

Ponder this: 30-40% of the hashrate is in the US. Another 30% is in China. The last third is somewhat distributed. The US is moving toward a bitcoin standard. No idea what China is doing but it is an autocracy so I expect they are behind the US on this. What happens when the cold war between these superpowers turns hot? Is China just gonna leave the mining pools alone?

If I was Xi I would dump treasury assets and fork the blockchain as soon the shooting starts. Tank the US economy exactly when you can inflict the most damage. They did this with Deepseek just a few months ago. With bitcoin this is even easier because Xi can just send men with guns to Bitmain HQ and do whatever the fuck he wants to do with 30% of block template production and 80% of ASIC production. Xi invokes emergency powers (or maybe it's not even necessary b/c he's already a dictator!) to trap existing ASICs within his sphere of control (which extends far beyond the Chinese borders we draw on maps). He uses his enormous ASIC production advantage to attack the real bitcoin blockchain with constant reorgs.

In this scenario the bitcoin value drops like a rock and stays down. Bitcoin developers' personal savings are wiped out and software development all but halts. The portion of global markets that still operate on the dollar standard go into a tailspin. Drone swarms start tearing up the "untouchable" blue water US Navy because our "elites" have their heads too far up their ass to recognize that we have lost the technological lead that enabled US global hegemony for the past 100 years. How does bitcoin recover from this?

Here's another scenario. Say in 3 years the American voters get tired of losing thanks to Trump's unbelievably stupid tariff strategy and vote in another 4 years of Marxist LARPers. But this time, thanks to the erosion of rule of law and checks and balances their efforts to vilify and dismantle bitcoin mining businesses succeed. They pass a law forcing bitcoin miners to support a hard fork to a proof of stake system. The real bitcoiners need to scramble and get their ASICs out of the country ASAP. Too late! The wannabe Marxists have already put export controls in place. Another chain fork, another unmitigated disaster for the bitcoin movement as a whole. It's not really that far fetched.

Bitcoin cannot be destroyed but it's path to global adoption can be set back by decades, or even centuries. Long enough for the tyrants to seize control of the system.

My point is not that these scenarios are inevitable. My point is that the failure modes are too innumerable to count. There are too many unknown unknowns. My conclusion is that bitcoin is too important to remain centralized. The thing that actually matters most is who is building block templates. Who controls the transactions that go in to the block and who controls the coinbase outputs of each new block.

You are correct that hashrate distribution is also critical but it's downstream of block template production.

A decentralized mining pool stack is well within reach. We can fix this before it spirals out of control. I intend to do exactly that.

Thank you for laying out a hard-hitting and necessary adversarial analysis. You're right to challenge complacency - particularly around mining centralization, block template control, and geopolitical risk.

However, while your note emphasizes the risks of centralized mining power and political overreach from superpowers like the U.S. and China, I want to offer a complementary concern: the global imbalance in Bitcoin readiness and its long-term implications for economic inequality.

Countries like India - despite being one of the world’s largest economies and home to a rapidly digitizing population - are far behind when it comes to actual Bitcoin adoption and infrastructure:

- Mining power is nearly nonexistent.

- Custodial access is heavily restricted or poorly understood.

- There is no real policy clarity, and regulatory discussions are sporadic and reactive rather than strategic.

- Cost of entry remains prohibitively high for average citizens and institutions alike.

This isn't just a temporary lag. It's a structural issue. While the U.S. and China continue to develop footholds in mining, custody, ASIC manufacturing, and even in shaping Bitcoin narratives, the Global South risks being locked out of meaningful participation - reduced to spectators in a system that was originally envisioned as trustless and globally inclusive.

If Bitcoin does become a global monetary backbone - or even a parallel store of value - the uneven accumulation of Bitcoin reserves and infrastructure will reinforce existing inequalities. The superpowers will have leverage, and the rest will be stuck playing catch-up in a game whose rules were written without them.

This could mean:

- Wealth consolidation, where early players gain massive asymmetrical control.

- Monetary colonialism, where countries without significant Bitcoin exposure are dependent on the policy whims of countries that hold the keys.

- Technological exclusion, where countries unable to manufacture ASICs or run cost-effective miners remain at the mercy of those who can.

Bitcoin’s promise was decentralization and economic freedom - but we need to ensure that promise is globally accessible, not just available to those who already have the capital, political leverage, or manufacturing capacity.

In this light, adversarial thinking shouldn’t just be about countering nation-state attacks or preparing for hard forks. It should also address how we make Bitcoin infrastructure equitably distributed across the globe.

Your note is an important warning about what superpowers might do when threatened. Mine is a warning about what happens when the rest of the world is too far behind to even compete. If we want Bitcoin to survive and live up to its potential, then decentralization must be about more than just mining - it must be about access and agency across all economies, not just the most powerful ones.

Not sure how to figure out, bridge that gap before the game becomes unwinnable.

I would have never ventured into the world of Sats, lightning payments or anything related to bitcoin... Thanks to this community!

#GrowNostr

Wordle 1,404 6/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩

⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩

⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Phew!! That was tough.

good night... Peace!