A year ago, I wrote an article for City AM, raising alarm bells about how children would be used to justify increasing online control under the pretence of protection. I warned that while laws like the Online Safety Bill may seem noble, they pave the way for overreach and the erosion of our freedoms.
Now, with the Australian PM stepping in on similar issues, it’s clear the trend is accelerating. The more we surrender control, under the pretence of convenience or safety, the more we lose—and it's not just affecting us, it's shaping the world our kids are growing up in.
As a parent, I’m struggling with the reality that I’ve handed my kids a dangerous device—a smartphone—one that society has normalised. It weighs heavily on me. The world is so focused on COVID, yet seems blind to the real epidemic: the pervasive influence of smartphones on all aspects of our lives.
I fully appreciate the need for decentralised social media. In fact, when I shared my thoughts on the harms of social media on X, the post appeared to be shadow-banned. I know Nostr plays a key role in the fight against censorship, but how do we protect children from the darker sides of social media on platforms like Nostr?
If it’s solely the responsibility of parents, the next generation of children could be at serious risk.
I’m reminded of how our freedoms are being eroded when I’m forced to use a cash till at the supermarket, realising how we trade away freedom for convenience in every corner of life. We’re slowly surrendering control, and it’s no different with our kids.
We say it’s for protecting children, but our children are far from safe. The dangers are real, and we turn a blind eye. If we stop them from participating in what’s “normal,” they face social isolation.
Yes, parents should take responsibility. But let’s be honest: it’s not happening. So, now what?
Governments claim they’re stepping in to stop misinformation, but we all know who the biggest culprits are—the ones with power.
From the moment my kids were born, my instinct has been to protect them. But how can we say no when homework is assigned through apps and phones becomes essential? It’s a trap. I left my old career because I couldn’t turn a blind eye to what I saw happening, and now I find myself reluctantly accepting the evil of this tech-dominated world.
Even adults struggle to regulate themselves with this tech. How can we expect kids to manage? Parents don’t seem to grasp the magnitude of what’s happening.
We’ve normalised a tech designed to be addictive, bombarding our kids with violence, porn, and unrealistic expectations. Billionaires who design these tools keep their kids away from them—what does that tell us?
This generation is drowning—sad, depressed, and lost. What are we going to do about it?
Parents need to step up. We’re the adults here. The government can’t fix this for us, and expecting them to will only strip away more of our freedoms. I’m genuinely terrified for our kids, and it feels like no one else sees what’s really happening.
From food to information, our entire world is poisoned. Bitcoin might be part of the solution, but that’s a conversation for another day.
How do we protect our children without sacrificing our freedoms? The current system isn’t working—parents are overwhelmed, governments are overreaching, and tech giants are exploiting the very tools that shape our kids' lives.
We need to find a solution, we’re leaving the next generation to navigate a dangerous and addictive digital world alone.
The question I’m asking myself is: ‘How do we ensure our kids grow up safe, informed, and free?’
https://www.cityam.com/i-see-the-online-safety-bill-as-a-digital-double-edged-sword/
Excellent question and excellent post.
These thoughts eventually led me to homeschool my kids, integrating a great co-op community nearby and it has made all the difference.
We are homeschooling our kids from the day they were born and the only question is WHY DID WE STOP?
Outsourcing the job to the state has been a more than 100 year mistake that has finally reached its full destructive potential.
Resist and be the weirdo…it makes all the difference
My thoughts:
1. M will generally do better in bringing about a more universally inclusive feeling among members
2. P will be more productive overall as a result of inherent competition with a strong projection of power.
3. M will generally produce less innovation and eventually be subjected to more external threats
4. P will produce a more cut-throat society driven by the laws of evolution.
That is my hypothesis.
Best form of gov? BOTH
No preference but the story has to be good.
That being said, current numerical advantage on my bookshelf is male driven so maybe that shows a subconscious male preference or it could be random
I’ve been a Sanderson fan since he ended the Wheel of Time series after Jordan died.
As a sound guy I recommend a few sound panels with either rockwool or OC 503. It will tame some reflections and room noise/echo issues.
You can get them now with your own artwork uploaded on them to be quite nice looking.
But I don’t like being patient ser
This is part of why IQ tests are so limited and difficult to create.
One of my psychology professors illustrated this point one day when he asked if Michael Jordans innate ability to be at the right place at the right time on the court was a sign of intelligence. If so then how could an equation on a paper ever really test it.
Fascinating stuff
I wonder if this tax does happen, do privacy coins like Monero suddenly surge for obvious reason?

