Don't any of this task. Your time has more value of this worthless shitcoin (made only for steal your money)
Never wrote configuration for Oracle, but i have done for others in past
The manual page systemd.unit and system.service should have the information you need
Hardfork are the equivalent of printing money in fiat. You are not creating value, only spreading it.
Miners will alway want the most profitable chain
If a fork will happen, one will be irrilevant and the other will continue to live
For a linux-based system, you can use Netdata for monitor the whole system
Error message doesn't help much. It might be something related to the software.
A good test can be if your friend try to send a payment to another Primal wallet and see if get error again
As long they can pay the fee, they can use the blockspace as they want. Until ordinals will be profitable, we have to deal with them.
Is this concerning? It may be, we are all pioneers and this is another rough stone in our path. Censor and change the res MUST not be the solution. Even bad actor must use the network if they are following the rules
What we can do is use this for understand how mitigate future events like that (because this will not be the first ones)
i would suggest a keyboard which is at least open source
Simple-Keyboard is one of them
It is possible it doesn't exist a path with enough liquidity for your payment. If possible, try to split it in smaller multiple payments
As for wallet software, you must choose the keyboard app you trust the most.
I would say to avoid any closed sourced app
If you have the proper knowledge background, you can check the code, download the source and compile your own version for maximim trust
As today, i don't feel the need to use a mixer. This may change if the future
The wallet may be struggling to find a path with enough capacity to send your transaction, has he must try to send the payment and try a new path in case of any errors
They will get less newly generated bitcoin, but if will be high enough they might even be more profitable.
The incentive to mine bitcoin will be more driven by how much the network is used
No, because for bump the fee you have to basically perform a double-spend, sending a second transaction which MUST have the same outputs and greater fee of the one you want replace (if you are spending all, you cannot achieve this)
In short, no. You have to keep something for bumping
D) Opening channels only if selling liquidity
Also, pausing new opening until more application will build on top of lightning, like Nostr zapping
if this a concern for you, set a base fee of 1 will be prevent for sure those low payments
Price matter. It tell us where we are in this journey.
When the 100k will be reach, i will smile.