Avatar
Dr. Fernando Morales
6b4ec98f02e647e01440b473bbd92a7fae21e01b6aa6c65e32db94a36092272e
•I am a general practitioner focused on optimizing health through the #carnivore and #ketogenic diet, as well as #quantumbiology. Listen to all my #Nostr exclusive content and more on Fountain: https://fountain.fm/show/X0FYoyalr3N4i1Pmq9YK #Ancap #Homeschooling #Austrianeconomics

Hot take for Nostr: the claim that all plants are dangerous to eat doesn't make logical sense.

Yes, even edible plants may produce compounds that are toxic. Every toxin is toxic in its own particular way. The body is a complex system; sometimes a chemical may benefit the body in one way while detracting from it in another. Sometimes a compound may only be toxic in certain concentrations or health conditions. Sometimes a toxin is quickly broken down in digestion and has no ill effect.

Even without that level of nuance, the belief that all plants are unsafe to eat doesn't make logical sense when you look at the animal kingdom and human history. Obligate herbivores, like cows, live their whole lives eating nothing but plants in perfect health. This should not be possible if plants are unsafe to eat because of their toxins.

You can tell which animals are naturally carnivores, omnivores, or herbivores by studying their teeth. Humans have omnivore teeth, and despite enormous variation, almost all human cultures have omnivorous diets -- yes, including nomads that get held up as the hunters living under a theoretically perfect meat-based diet. They are called hunter-gatherers because they gather (forage) as well. The closest culture I know of to living carnivore, the Inuit, still ate vegetable matter like berries at the rare times when they could.

Clearly, meat is health-giving for most people. Some can live well (but do we know for how long?) on a diet of meat alone. Carnivore and other high-meat diets are documented to have corrected serious health issues in many individuals.

I'm just suggesting to the more aggressively carnivore: take a step back and a deep breath, because you are coming across very arrogantly. Your diet may not be ideal for every individual, and to insist that it is because plants are toxic does not reflect the broader perspective I've touched on above.

There's no call to get rude about dietary choices. Save that anger for tyrants who want to be your master.

#diet #carnivore #thoughts #grownostr

Humans have beem opportunistic omnivores for most part of our existence, nonetheless, nitrogen and carbon isotope testing on human fossils dating back hundreds of thousands of years reveal our diet was mainly meat. In fact, depending on the geographic location, our diet was composed of at least 70% meat, giving us the status of hyper carnivores. Amongst omnivores, there are species that are more plant heavy and others that are more meat heavy, we are of the latter. Not enough time has passed for evolution to regift us with full plant processing digestion.

Cow's GI tract is very different from that of a human.

Humans had no evolutionary pressure to develop razor sharp teeth or claws thanks to our thumbs, tool crafting abilities and ability to strategize.

I agree that there's no need to be religious about diets, as it can turn people away from improving their health. My takeaway is, eat mainly meat and stay away from the processed stuff. Fermented foods are also great.

The inflammatory effect of seed oils (very high concentrations of linoleic acid) comes from the industrial processes, as you described, and of the concentration. Yes, it can also apply to olive oil. So if you want to consume olive oil, I'd recommend it be extra virgen cold pressed organic olive oil. It will have much smaller amounts of linoleic acid.

Nonetheless, it can be hard to find a decent brand since it's very easy to mix olive oil and other seed oils without you being able to notice the difference, even with laboratory equipment.

Peanuts aren't necessarily bad for you and you'll get mixed responses amongst the low carb community. One thing is for sure, they're a lot healthier than seed oils.

Does anyone know how to add a lightning address for receiving zaps on satellite.earth ? I'm probably blind but for some reason I can't find the option.

#asknostr #asktr

Acabo de crear una comunidad para hablar sobre todo lo relacionado con una dieta carnívora/cetogénica! Suscríbanse!

#hispano #grownostr #latam #mexico #españa #español #espana #argentina #colombia #chile #plebchain #dietacarnivora #dietacetogenica

https://satellite.earth/n/Somoscarnivoros/npub1q4yfp5cex4tme542lq0qrdrn4nvl3ql27wyyjvq37vcqhhqga89q3grjqe/new

Replying to Avatar Uno

Block nostr:npub1tl9g9p0dgjp483cp7a86amdz4mpvgtgrzx4v9xmqph9xzshmrdqqvyxqca everyone, unless you want to get spammed with gross Ai photos.

#Plebchain

Omg thank you

•Desayunos para Diabéticos: Descubre los Mejores y Evita los Peores

Aqui está mi primer vídeo 100% en #Nostr, voy probar subir mis vídeos de esta forma e intentar ser el cambio que quiero ver en el mundo.

#hispano #grownostr #latam #mexico #españa #español #españa #argentina #colombia #chile #plebchain #dietacarnivora #dietacetogenica

https://cdn.satellite.earth/5c14c05141279e8bdd1701600a8d10f001e8d4b382d43b4841b933f4d9a500ba.mp4

I've been thinking about this actually. My content is mainly about the carnivore diet and most of my audience so far is 45+, which makes sense, they're the most likely interested in returning to a healthier state.

So that has me at my dilemma, go for decentralisation now and have a lower impact on the people who could benefit from this or choose to grow an audience there first (I barely started my YT channel) and then switch later on to Nostr.

Also, my content is in Spanish and it seems the Spanish speaking community is nowhere near as big as the English speaking one.

Thanks for the response, I'm trying to learn about the different perspectives in order to see what's best for my personal circumstances. I also think there might be a time people will mainly earn in BTC and kyc/non-kyc will become irrelevant, the current lines of thinking I see are the following:

1. The optimist, perhaps naive to some:

If I think BTC will be the world's money eventually, wouldn't it be better to stack "cheaper" (kyc) sats? Buying non-kyc will only mean being "poorer" in the future. Plus with wealth, you can vote with your feet and go where you're treated best (living in [various] smaller less controlling nations that are actually competing for foreign capital).

2. The cautious, perhaps a doomer to some:

The world might transition to using bitcoin but it might be a bumpy ride with governments trying to steal and control as much as they can before going out. Buying non-kyc increases my chances of keeping some of that bitcoin in the future.

I think the optimal way of thinking lies somewhere in between. The optimist runs a larger risk of his private information being leaked to hackers or governments. The cautious will have to spend their BTC eventually (for a house, a car or something) and never make a privacy mistake, because if he/she lacks proper UTXO management or whatever, their BTC stash amount could be known and even have their identity discovered. Making all/most of their privacy enhancing measures irrelevant.