The Ethical Crisis in Modern Psychology: A Field on the Brink of a Historic Reckoning
https://m.primal.net/PNFI.webp
As an observer, the psychological field is careening toward an inevitable reckoning—one that will leave a lasting mark on its credibility. Once it becomes widely accepted that gender-affirming care was built on pseudoscience and leaves many patients worse off than when they began, the entire field of psychology will bear the consequences. This will be a black eye for the profession, exposing its failure to uphold its duty to do no harm.
Psychology has long struggled for legitimacy, striving to establish itself as a serious science dedicated to understanding human thought and behavior. Yet, the field now faces a crisis as ideological influence overtakes its institutions, governing boards, and professional culture. This shift undermines the work of countless professionals who have spent their careers legitimizing psychology as a credible science, replacing rigorous inquiry with activism-driven agendas.
Since the election of President Trump, there has been a rollback of some of these policies, signaling a shift away from the most extreme ideological positions. However, the field itself must take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask whether it has been complicit in causing harm by facilitating the medical transition of vulnerable individuals without any real long-term studies on the efficacy of such radical treatments. We are talking about life-altering and irreversible decisions—unproven surgeries with high complication rates that increase all-cause mortality rates. The psychological community must confront the reality that it has pushed these interventions with little scientific scrutiny, placing ideology ahead of patient safety.
The Pseudoscientific Assault on Patients
The most alarming consequence of this ideological capture is the physical harm inflicted upon vulnerable patients through so-called "gender-affirming care." The prevailing model insists that anyone questioning their gender identity must immediately be affirmed, with no consideration for alternative treatments or underlying psychological conditions. Instead of exploring root causes—such as trauma, autism, depression, or social contagion—mental health professionals now push patients toward irreversible medical interventions, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures that can result in permanent bodily harm.
Despite mounting evidence that many individuals later regret these procedures and attempt to detransition, the psychological establishment continues to push this ideology as unquestionable truth. Critics who raise concerns about these unethical practices are silenced, deplatformed, and labeled as bigots.
Psychology's Long History of Ethical Failures
This is far from the first time the mental health field has been complicit in unethical practices. Decades ago, psychology was used to justify inhumane experiments and coercive treatments, such as lobotomies and electroshock therapy.
Now, history is repeating itself, with mental health professionals engaging in another form of sanctioned abuse—this time in the form of ideological medical interventions. The field has willingly sacrificed ethics and scientific integrity to appease political activists who demand compliance with their agenda, regardless of the cost to human lives.
The Need for a Reckoning
It is time for a major reckoning in psychology and mental health. The field must abandon its commitment to radical leftist ideology and return to a foundation of empirical science, open inquiry, and ethical responsibility. The lives of vulnerable individuals—particularly children and adolescents—depend on it.
The mental health industry’s embrace of pseudoscience is not just a betrayal of the discipline—it is a direct violation of its duty to protect and heal. Until psychology rejects ideology-driven medicine and recommits itself to truth, it will continue to be an instrument of harm rather than healing.
The APA Under Fire: Accusations of Antisemitism and Ideological Capture
The American Psychological Association (APA), the premier organization representing psychologists in the United States, is facing significant backlash as over 3,500 mental health professionals have signed a letter condemning what they describe as "virulent antisemitism" within the organization. The letter, addressed to APA leadership, calls for immediate action to address what it describes as a "serious and systemic problem of antisemitism/anti-Jewish hate."
A Culture of Intolerance
The signatories allege that Jewish members have been subjected to harassment, marginalization, and outright silencing within APA forums, particularly when attempting to challenge antisemitic rhetoric or correct misinformation. This issue, they claim, is not isolated but rather indicative of a broader cultural problem within the APA—one where leftist ideological orthodoxy takes precedence over open discourse and ethical professional standards.
Critics argue that the APA has allowed itself to be captured by leftist political ideologues who push a singular narrative on social issues, stifling dissenting perspectives. This ideological takeover has allegedly resulted in a professional climate that prioritizes certain progressive political agendas over scientific objectivity, fostering an environment where antisemitism is tolerated under the guise of social justice.
Political Bias and the Decline of Scientific Rigor
The APA has long been accused of shifting away from its scientific foundations in favor of left-wing political activism. Over the past decade, its public statements and policies have increasingly mirrored the rhetoric of radical activist movements, often adopting positions that some psychologists argue lack empirical support. The association's willingness to promote divisive ideological frameworks—such as radical interpretations of race, gender, and identity—has led to concerns that it is more interested in ideological conformity than in maintaining rigorous scientific inquiry.
This ideological entrenchment has had tangible consequences. APA-endorsed discussions and guidelines now frequently reflect extreme leftist perspectives, making it difficult for professionals who hold dissenting or moderate views to engage in open debate. This culture of suppression extends beyond the issue of antisemitism—psychologists who question prevailing leftist narratives on issues like gender dysphoria, race relations, or even best clinical practices often find themselves ostracized or professionally penalized.
Antisemitism as a Symptom of a Larger Leftist Problem
The current antisemitism controversy highlights the APA’s broader problem: the prioritization of leftist ideological purity over intellectual diversity and ethical responsibility. The APA has increasingly pushed progressive activism over scientific discourse, as seen in its embrace of racial essentialism, Critical Race Theory (CRT), and radical gender ideology.
One of the most controversial examples of this was the 2019 APA guidelines on masculinity, which framed traditional male traits—such as competitiveness and stoicism—as inherently harmful. This led to widespread criticism that the APA was pathologizing traditional male behavior rather than promoting a balanced discussion of gender psychology.
Similarly, in the realm of gender identity, the APA has aggressively endorsed gender-affirming care models, including medical and surgical interventions for gender dysphoria, while dismissing or silencing dissenting views. Many psychologists and medical professionals have raised concerns that this approach prioritizes ideology over a nuanced, patient-centered perspective.
Furthermore, the APA’s increasing alignment with radical interpretations of race has led to the endorsement of frameworks that critics argue promote racial essentialism. Its adoption of Critical Race Theory-aligned perspectives has resulted in divisive identity politics that overemphasize systemic oppression while downplaying individual agency and resilience.
Suppressing Dissenting Voices
Many professionals within psychology report fear of speaking out against dominant leftist ideological narratives within the APA due to the risk of professional repercussions. The APA has been accused of fostering a cancel-culture-like atmosphere, where psychologists who challenge progressive orthodoxy on gender, race, or therapy approaches face professional ostracization.
This extends to the politicization of therapy itself. Some patients and therapists have reported pressure to adopt leftist ideological stances during therapy sessions, making it difficult to maintain objectivity and ethical neutrality.
The APA’s Troubling History of Ethical Failures
The APA’s ideological shift is not just a recent development. The organization was previously criticized for its involvement in advising the U.S. government on enhanced interrogation techniques (torture) during the post-9/11 era. While the APA later condemned these practices, its initial involvement damaged its reputation and raised questions about its susceptibility to external political pressures.
This history suggests that the APA is willing to shift its positions based on prevailing political winds rather than upholding consistent ethical standards. Its recent shift towards radical leftist ideologies further erodes trust in its credibility as a neutral scientific body.
Conclusion
The APA is at a crossroads—its increasing ideological alignment with leftist activism has led many to question whether it remains a credible scientific body or if it has become a political advocacy group. Many psychologists believe the APA needs to return to a more balanced, open discourse that prioritizes empirical research over ideological conformity. Whether it will do so remains to be seen.
For now, APA leadership has yet to respond meaningfully to the accusations. If the organization fails to address these concerns, it risks alienating a significant portion of its membership while further eroding public trust in psychology as a science-based discipline. As long as leftist ideological extremism continues to dominate the field, the APA will remain at the center of controversy—unable to fulfill its true mission of advancing psychology for the betterment of society.
Gene Hackman and Wife Found Dead in Santa Fe Home
Santa Fe, NM – Legendary actor Gene Hackman and his wife, Betsy Arakawa, were found dead in their Santa Fe, New Mexico home. Authorities have stated that no foul play is suspected, though the exact cause of death remains under investigation.
Authorities Confirm No Criminal Activity
The Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that Hackman, 95, and Arakawa, 63, were discovered alongside their deceased dog. Sheriff Adan Mendoza reported that while investigations are ongoing, there is no evidence suggesting foul play or any threat to the community. Autopsy results are pending to determine the cause of death.
A Hollywood Legend Remembered
Hackman was widely regarded as one of the greatest actors of his generation, winning Academy Awards for The French Connection (1971) and Unforgiven (1992). His powerful performances in The Conversation, Superman, and Hoosiers cemented his status as a cinematic icon.
Despite his success, Hackman retired from acting in 2004, choosing a quiet life in Santa Fe with Arakawa, a classical pianist. Married since 1991, the couple lived privately, away from the Hollywood spotlight.
Tributes Pour In
Fans and fellow actors have taken to social media to mourn the loss of Hackman and Arakawa. Many have praised Hackman’s impact on film and remembered the couple’s enduring bond.
"Gene Hackman was a legend—his performances were unforgettable. He and Betsy will be dearly missed," one tribute read.
As the investigation continues, Hackman’s legacy lives on through his timeless films, ensuring that his contributions to cinema will never be forgotten.
The Right’s Digital Ecosystem: How Conservatives Built Their Own Media Infrastructure
https://m.primal.net/PLer.webp
For decades, the Left dominated mainstream media, shaping narratives and defining the limits of acceptable discourse. The vast majority of legacy media—including major television networks, newspapers, and magazines—leaned left. Hollywood’s entertainment industry reinforced leftist values through storytelling, while social media platforms like Twitter 1.0 and Facebook enforced ideological conformity through censorship and algorithmic manipulation.
However, when conservatives were increasingly deplatformed, censored, or shadow-banned by these dominant platforms, they responded by building their own parallel digital ecosystem. This ecosystem now serves as an alternative to the legacy media and Big Tech, allowing the Right to bypass traditional gatekeepers and communicate directly with audiences.
The Left’s Media Hegemony
Legacy media outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, and The Washington Post have long been aligned with progressive ideologies. These institutions present themselves as neutral purveyors of truth while systematically framing issues through a left-wing lens.
Hollywood further solidifies these narratives by promoting progressive themes in film and television, often marginalizing conservative perspectives. Social media platforms, which began as relatively open forums, gradually adopted content moderation policies that disproportionately targeted conservative voices. Twitter 1.0, for example, was notorious for banning right-wing figures while allowing left-wing activists to operate freely. Facebook and YouTube employed similar tactics, demonetizing and censoring conservative content creators under the guise of fighting “misinformation” and “hate speech.”
The Right’s Response: Building an Alternative Ecosystem
As censorship escalated, conservatives recognized the need for independent platforms free from leftist control. In response, a wave of alternative media outlets and social media networks emerged:
Gab and Minds provided free-speech-oriented alternatives to Twitter.
Parler (before its takedown and relaunch) sought to offer a space for uncensored political discussion.
Rumble and Odysee challenged YouTube’s dominance by providing independent video hosting for banned or demonetized creators.
BitChute became another video-sharing alternative with minimal moderation.
Locals and Substack empowered independent journalists and commentators to build their own audiences without relying on traditional media gatekeepers.
Truth Social, launched by Donald Trump, gave conservatives a dedicated space to engage in political discourse without the risk of deplatforming.
The Decline of Legacy Media and the Rise of Alternative News
Over time, mainstream audiences grew increasingly skeptical of legacy media. Scandals involving biased reporting, outright misinformation, and suppression of important stories—such as the Hunter Biden laptop scandal—eroded trust. As a result, people started seeking alternative sources for news and analysis, leading them to the right’s digital ecosystem.
Rather than relying on institutions that actively worked against them, conservatives and many disillusioned centrists turned to platforms where information was less filtered. As a result, independent journalists, commentators, and creators on Rumble, Locals, and Substack now command significant audiences, often surpassing traditional media outlets in reach and engagement.
A New Battle for Information Control
The emergence of this parallel ecosystem has led to an ongoing struggle between legacy media and alternative platforms. Legacy media outlets attempt to delegitimize these alternatives by labeling them as hubs of “misinformation” and “extremism.” Big Tech companies continue to impose restrictions on content from alternative platforms, limiting its visibility in search results and app stores.
Despite these challenges, the right’s digital infrastructure continues to grow, fueled by an increasing demand for unfiltered, independent content. With public trust in legacy media at historic lows, the conservative digital ecosystem is not just surviving—it’s thriving. As audiences migrate away from traditional sources of information, this alternative ecosystem may soon redefine the future of news, culture, and political discourse.
Naomi Seibt: 🚨🇩🇪 THE TERR0R ENDS WITH YOUR VOTE! 🗳️
The longer you postpone the inevitable blue AfD wave, the more you extend the victims’ suffering.
Not a day goes by that I do not fear for my friends’ and family’s lives.
Only the AfD can save Germany.
Ashley St. Clair’s Lawyer Suing Elon Musk: Dror Bikel’s Background and Past Statements
According to journalist Laura Loomer, Dror Bikel, the lawyer representing Ashley St. Clair in her custody case against Elon Musk, has a professional and public history that has drawn attention due to his past statements and affiliations.
Who is Dror Bikel?
Dror Bikel is a New York-based divorce attorney specializing in high-profile cases. He is the founder of the Jewish Empowerment Training Network (JET) and has been involved in Israeli advocacy, including leadership roles in Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces. Bikel also holds a second-degree black belt in Krav Maga and has been involved in volunteer security initiatives for his local synagogue.
Past Statements on Elon Musk and Donald Trump
Bikel has previously made statements about high-profile individuals, including Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump. In his book The 1% Divorce: When Titans Clash, published in 2020, he discusses the divorces of Donald Trump in a dedicated chapter. Additionally, in a past interview discussing high-powered individuals and their personal relationships, Bikel referenced Musk, stating:
"These high-powered, successful billionaires often leave a train wreck of a social life. The classic example, frankly, is Elon Musk… He has been in and out of many more relationships. He actually was married to the same woman more than once, and the trail of destruction on his social life is a direct consequence of his non-stop ambition."
Bikel also wrote an op-ed for The Times of Israel in 2021, titled An Apology to My Israeli Brothers and Sisters from a Liberal American Jew, in which he criticized former President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding their role in the Abraham Accords.
Connections to Other High-Profile Cases
Bikel previously represented Judith Giuliani, the ex-wife of Rudy Giuliani, in a 2022 divorce case. Giuliani, a former Trump attorney and former mayor of New York City, has been a significant figure in conservative political circles.
Additional Context and Loomer’s Claims
Loomer also noted that St. Clair hired Brian Glicklich, a public relations professional, for her public messaging related to the custody case. Glicklich has been involved in political communications and previously received funding from an Israeli security firm for lobbying efforts in the U.S.
Further, Loomer has suggested that Ashley St. Clair’s actions may have broader political implications. She stated on X that she believes St. Clair is actively trying to harm former President Trump, citing the way she “ran to the media and lawyers with her text messages.” Loomer also claims to have evidence of this, which she plans to release, and pointed out that St. Clair included screenshots in legal filings that featured the face of a Senior Trump advisor without blurring their identity. According to Loomer, this indicates a disregard for the advisor and the Trump administration as a whole.
Additionally, Loomer claims to have more evidence suggesting that St. Clair is working with Trump critics to amplify her legal battle with Musk, promising further disclosures.
Given Bikel’s past statements and legal work, questions have been raised regarding the motivations behind his involvement in this case. Some observers have speculated about the broader implications of St. Clair’s legal strategy and the choice of representation.
Laura Loomer uncovered and reported on this information, providing screenshots of Bikel’s past statements and writings.
https://x.com/StealthMedical1/status/1893433980029989322
Trump’s Global War Room: German AFD Elections, Super PACs IRAN NIAC CCP
Join us.
Understanding the Global Jihadist Network: Structure, Leadership, and Influence
https://m.primal.net/PGfK.webp
Introduction
The global jihadist movement consists of a network of interconnected organizations, leaders, and regional factions operating under shared ideological and strategic goals. These groups, while sometimes competing, often collaborate through advisory councils and shared ideological frameworks. Understanding the structure of these organizations is key to analyzing their global impact and strategies.
1. Central Command: The Islamic Army Shura Council
At the top of the jihadist hierarchy is the Islamic Army Shura Council, a governing body that coordinates strategies and leadership across various extremist organizations. Similar to a board of directors, this council includes influential figures from multiple jihadist factions, guiding the broader movement’s goals and operations.
The Islamic Army (IA), also referred to as the "Army of Imam Mahdi," is depicted as a militant coalition preparing for an ultimate battle between "believers" and "disbelievers" based on religious prophecy【27†source】.
2. Key Leadership Figures
Below the Shura Council are influential leaders who have played a significant role in shaping the global jihadist movement. Among them are:
Osama Bin Laden – Founder of Al-Qaeda, instrumental in global jihadist expansion【27†source】.
Ayman al-Zawahiri – Former leader of Al-Qaeda, known for shaping the group's ideological direction【27†source】.
Mullah Omar – Founder of the Taliban, played a key role in Afghanistan’s Islamist governance【27†source】.
Hassan Al-Banna – Founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist movement with political and ideological influence【27†source】.
Sayyid Qutb – An ideological figure whose writings have influenced jihadist thought, often referred to as "the father of Salafi Jihadism"【27†source】.
Haibatullah Akhundzada – The current leader (Emir-ul-Momineen) of the Taliban, overseeing its governance in Afghanistan【27†source】.
These leaders have shaped the strategic and ideological framework of jihadist organizations, influencing recruitment, operations, and propaganda.
3. Major Organizations and Their Roles
Several large jihadist organizations operate under the broader movement’s ideology, each with regional affiliates and specific goals. These include:
Al-Qaeda – A global jihadist network responsible for the 9/11 attacks, with regional branches such as:
Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)
Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS)
The Taliban – A militant group controlling Afghanistan, with key factions like the Haqqani Network【27†source】.
ISIS (Islamic State) – Known for its attempt to establish a Caliphate, with regional branches including:
ISIS-Khorasan Province (ISKP) in Afghanistan
Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP)
ISIS Syria【27†source】.
Muslim Brotherhood – A political Islamist movement with influence across multiple countries【27†source】.
These organizations often operate semi-independently but share resources, training, and ideological alignment.
4. Regional Presence and Expansion
Jihadist organizations operate across different regions, adapting their strategies to local conditions. Key areas of influence include:
Middle East & North Africa – Strongholds in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Libya【27†source】.
South & Central Asia – Afghanistan and Pakistan serve as major operational bases【27†source】.
Sub-Saharan Africa – Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab are prominent actors【27†source】.
Southeast Asia – Groups like Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah have influence【27†source】.
Western jihadist cells – Some groups maintain smaller operational networks in Europe and North America【27†source】.
5. The Strategic Objective: Expansion of a Caliphate
The overarching goal of many of these jihadist groups is to establish and expand an Islamic Caliphate governed by their interpretation of Islamic law. The strategy includes:
Military operations – Engaging in insurgencies and attacks.
Propaganda and recruitment – Using digital platforms to expand influence【27†source】.
Governance attempts – Establishing control over territories, as seen in Afghanistan and previously in ISIS-controlled regions【27†source】.
Symbolism in Flags – The black Shahada flag is used in wartime, while the white flag symbolizes an established Islamic Emirate (e.g., Afghanistan under the Taliban)【27†source】.
Conclusion
The global jihadist network is a complex web of interrelated organizations with a shared ideological foundation. While leadership structures evolve over time, the movement's core objectives remain centered around establishing governance aligned with their ideological beliefs. Understanding these connections is essential for global security analysis and counterterrorism efforts.
Jeffrey Sachs and the Orchestrated Border Crisis https://m.primal.net/PGJN.mp4
Jeffrey Sachs, the Catholic Church, and UN Sustainability: Catholic Charities’ Aid for Migrant Asylum Seekers
In an era defined by global migration challenges, the interplay between economic policy, religious ethics, and international development goals has gained increasing prominence. The book Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development (Columbia University Press, 2022), co-edited by renowned economist Jeffrey D. Sachs, Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, and others, exemplifies this nexus. Emerging from a multi-year dialogue hosted by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the volume bridges the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with ethical frameworks, notably those of the Catholic Church. A key, yet often underexplored, outcome of this collaboration is its implicit support for Catholic Charities’ efforts to assist migrant asylum seekers in the United States. This article examines the connections between Sachs’ leadership, the Church’s theological stance, the UN’s migration-focused SDGs, and the practical application of these principles through Catholic Charities in the U.S. context.
Jeffrey Sachs and the UN Sustainable Development Framework
Jeffrey D. Sachs, director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and a key figure in the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, brings an economic lens to global challenges. His appointment to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences in 2021 underscores his unique position at the intersection of secular policy and religious ethics (Crux, 2021). In Ethics in Action, Sachs contributes Chapter 20, "The Drivers of Migration," which explores the structural causes of human displacement—poverty, conflict, and climate change—aligning with SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. This goal emphasizes safe, orderly, and responsible migration, a priority Sachs has championed through his UN affiliations.
The book’s genesis—stemming from discussions between 2016 and 2018—reflects a deliberate effort to integrate ethical perspectives into the SDGs. Sachs’ role as co-editor ensures that migration, a pressing global issue, is framed not only as an economic or logistical challenge but also as a moral imperative, resonating with religious traditions.
The Catholic Church’s Ethical and Practical Engagement
The Catholic Church’s involvement in Ethics in Action is both symbolic and substantive. With a foreword by Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, the volume carries the imprimatur of Christian leadership. The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, under Chancellor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, hosted the initiative, reinforcing the Church’s commitment to social justice (Columbia University Press, 2022).
A pivotal contribution comes from Rev. Daniel G. Groody, C.S.C., a University of Notre Dame theologian and migration expert. In Chapter 22, "Migration and Refugees: A Christian Perspective," Groody likely articulates the Church’s theological response to migration, rooted in Catholic social teaching (Notre Dame Leadership Council, n.d.). His broader scholarship, including A Theology of Migration (2018), which earned accolades from the Catholic Press Association and a foreword by Pope Francis, emphasizes the Church’s duty to welcome the stranger. Groody’s collaborations with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Vatican amplify this stance, linking doctrine to action.
The Church’s ethical framework aligns seamlessly with SDG 10, which calls for inclusive societies and humane migration policies. This convergence is not theoretical; it manifests in the Church’s global network of charitable organizations, notably Catholic Charities.
Catholic Charities and U.S. Asylum Seekers
In the United States, Catholic Charities stands as a frontline actor in supporting migrant asylum seekers. Offering shelter, legal assistance, and resettlement services, the organization embodies the Church’s commitment to the marginalized (Catholic Charities USA, n.d.). Events like Fr. Groody’s lectures hosted by Catholic Charities of Oregon illustrate this synergy, fostering dialogue on migration’s human dimensions (Catholic Charities of Oregon, n.d.). Groody’s receipt of a Centennial Medal from
Catholic Charities further cements his influence on these efforts.
While Ethics in Action adopts a global perspective, its discussions on migration ethics implicitly encompass the U.S., a major destination for asylum seekers. The book’s emphasis on religious responses to the "mass migration and refugee crisis" (Center for Sustainable Development, 2022) suggests that Catholic Charities’ work aligns with the principles Sachs and Groody advocate. This alignment bridges international goals with local action, addressing the influx of migrants at the U.S. border through a lens of compassion and sustainability.
Synthesis: A Cohesive Ethical Agenda
The connections between Jeffrey Sachs, the Catholic Church, the UN SDGs, and Catholic Charities form a cohesive agenda. Sachs’ analysis of migration drivers provides the intellectual foundation, while the Church, through contributors like Groody, supplies the ethical and theological impetus. The SDGs, particularly Goal 10, offer a policy framework that Catholic Charities operationalizes in the U.S. context. This interplay is striking: a globally focused text, rooted in Vatican dialogues, indirectly bolsters grassroots efforts in American communities.
The book’s lack of explicit focus on the U.S. does not diminish its relevance. Migration’s universal nature ensures that its principles apply to key receiving nations like the United States, where Catholic Charities translates ethics into action. This dynamic highlights a surprising synergy: international development goals and religious charity converge to address one of the 21st century’s defining challenges.
Conclusion
Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development illuminates a profound collaboration between Jeffrey Sachs, the Catholic Church, and the UN, with tangible implications for migrant asylum seekers in the United States. Through Sachs’ economic expertise, the Church’s moral authority, and Catholic Charities’ practical outreach, this partnership advances a vision of sustainable development that prioritizes human dignity. As migration continues to shape global and national landscapes, this model offers a blueprint for integrating ethics, policy, and action—a testament to the power of interdisciplinary dialogue in addressing complex crises.
References
Catholic Charities of Oregon. (n.d.). A New Imagination on Migration with Fr. Daniel Groody. Retrieved from https://www.catholiccharitiesoregon.org/events/upcoming/a-new-imagination-on-migration-with-fr-daniel-groody/
Catholic Charities USA. (n.d.). Immigration Services. Retrieved from https://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/what-we-do/immigration-services/
https://m.primal.net/PGHM.webp Center for Sustainable Development. (2022). New Book: Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://csd.columbia.edu/news/ethics-in-action
Columbia University Press. (2022). Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://cup.columbia.edu/book/ethics-in-action-for-sustainable-development/9780231202879
Crux. (2021, October). Economist Jeffrey Sachs says he is honored to be appointed to papal academy. Retrieved from
University of Notre Dame. (n.d.). Rev. Daniel G. Groody, C.S.C.. Retrieved from https://www.nd.edu/about/leadership/council/daniel-groody/
The Jalisco New Generation Cartel https://m.primal.net/PGGV.mp4
Steve Andreas wrote a 2 Volume Book Series Called, "Transforming Negative Self-Talk" best book series I've ever read on changing self talk. He has people do exercises that changes the voice into other peoples voices, change the location, volume, the direction it's coming from, etc... best material I've ever seen on self talk.
The Story of Elzéard Bouffier https://m.primal.net/PFHr.mp4
Symbolism of Terrorism https://m.primal.net/PFGt.mp4
The Splinternet https://m.primal.net/PFFy.mp4
USAID Corrupt Slush Fund https://m.primal.net/PFEk.mp4
The Tricameral Brain https://m.primal.net/PFCk.mp4
AI Man meets the Moth Man https://m.primal.net/PFBq.mp4