Avatar
Antifa_central
6cb09e1b15b5670b001f3ebdc33c27e7a11e9b71ade9eaa4fa5879f0d8afed0e
Writer. Socialist. Recovered Crypto Bro (though it did pay a significant portion of my home).

A weird old xenophobe was right about some things?! Lmfao

Yes. And money that isn't related to labor is nonsense.

If there is labor that needs to be done and money is being held hostage by the wealthy, something needs to change. Changing money doesn't change the capitalistic impulse for accumulation. BTC mining is controlled by less than ten people. At least be an ETH enthusiast, dude.

We know what needs to happen to save the world and improve the life of everyone in society, but rich folks won't let it happen. Crypto isn't the answer

It's been ruined by libertarians, just like America.

Money isn't the base layer of society. Labor is, as you point out. Money is made up so we know where to allocate labor, but monopolies and wealth disparities in that market cause the labor allocation to be skewed in favor of whatever the rich want, perpetuating an anti-democratic downward spiral into what Russia has today and where we're headed.

Lol. And leave the most powerful country to the right wing that already almost has complete control? A lot of poor people count on communists like me to represent them in housing court and shit. I can't just bail on them. This is my fucking country too.

Independent, except for all the computers it takes to keep Bitcoin going. Except for the other people who use Bitcoin. Lolol

#independenceday

#socialism will win

Happy #IndependenceDay to the US and the many other countries around the world who celebrate, at different times throughout the year, their independence from the UK.

And a very Happy Independence Day to the people of the #Philippines who became independent from a different evil empire in a July 4th as well!

Better than which places, exactly? Better than the places where student and medical debt aren't things? Better than places where mortality rate isn't increasing? Or places where old folks can retire? Places where families can afford a home? The American dream is available to fewer and fewer people every year, despite the vast amount of resources that we take from other countries at criminally low rates.

Being a part of basically the biggest war crime machine since ever

Too bad. It'd be way better than the bullshit we have now

Replying to Avatar ODELL

A Cypherpunk's Manifesto

Eric Hughes

March 9, 1993

---------------------

Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.

Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.

Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.

We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.

We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.

Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.

For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.

The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.

Onward.