To what false accusation was this the response? I know it was timed such that there was some truth revealed, but there are too many for me to have a clear understanding.

Don't wait for it.

Wait .. so are you saying I should look for a beautiful girl with a short boyfriend, or are you saying I don't stand a chance in a million years? 😋

I feel like I'm missing out on the point you're making.

nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6mmnw3ezuur4vgkhjsen communicate. Make a point if you want to challenge my statements. Provide some information to acknowledge statements. I cannot get straightforward information and I am stuck with patholigical liars and psychopaths.

Any more lies or idiotic conclusions? I was quite clear about all of it I would think.

No, what I meant is that: if one violates your privacy, and you are only ever to retaliate by violating their privacy, then your attacker will by definition always be at an advantage, and he will be able to protect himself against your attempts at defense.

They weren't wrong. They lied. That was pointed out many times before. But, I'll take it as a compliment anyways. 💙

But you can compensate for some resistance by diving further forward. Don't ruin it for me. 😅 I'm kind of enjoying the scenario. 😂😂🤣

No. At least not under the assumption of constant speed, i.e. zero acceleration. (And no wind resistance.)

Maybe not the algorithm itself, but the people acting on it and the events coordinated by it. In short, the bad intentions resulting in it

Okay, but where did you read/interpret the 'pro-active' conponent from?

I've never seen that movie.

I hadn't quite thought as far ahead as contracted external parties, but sure, that makes sense.

To clarify, someone with bad intentions may, for example, spend a decade or more gathering information, spreading lies and what more, in preparation. If you would then be obliged to respond strictly in kind, you have a 10+ year disadvantage.

Your statement is fair in that, if unjustified, you're no longer defending. I was not speaking of pro-active defense. I assume you know and wanted to make a separate point?

FIX IT GODDAMNIT. 8 YEARS OF ABUSE IS NOT OKAY!

YOU CHOSE TO DENY ME MY HUMAN RIGHTS! YOU CHOSE TO FORCE RELIGION DOWN MY THROAT. YOU CHOSE TO NOT COMMUNICATE. YOU CHOSE TO DISMISS TRUTHFUL EXPLANATIONS, MANY TIMES OVER. YPU CHOSE TO LIE AND DECEIVE AND MANIPULATE. YOU CHOSE TO FRUSTRATE MY ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS. YOU DECIDED TO ACT BEHIND MY BACK. YOU DECIDED TO ATTACK ME BEFORE HEARING MY SIDE OF ANY STORY. YOU DECIDED TO TRY AND FORCE YOUR NARRATIVE DOWN MY THROAT. YOU CHOSE TO IGNORE CONTRADICTING (PUBLIC) INFORMATION. YOU MANIPULATED MY ATTEMPTS AT CLARIFICATION. YOU CHOSE TO WITHHOLD AND DENIED ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. YOU CHOSE TO DENY ME ANY PEACEFUL ATTEMPT AT RESOLUTION. YOU DENIED ME THE POSSIBILITY FOR DISCOURSE AND SCRUTINY. YOU DECIDED TO (TRY TO) DESTROY MY REPUTATION.

The list just never ends. Same with your list of arbitrary, mutually inconsistent "rules". Same with your constantly changing goals and narratives.

You have been utter and complete abusive pieces of shit at all costs, at every opportunity, with no regard for reality.

You chose to ignore the many, many, many, many signs and warnings I gave.

Again, for people who are not aware. I'm sorry. Very specific people know exactly what this is about.

I think you may need to be satisfied with collecting stickers.

That's not what integrity is about.

What are you saying, that their marketing departments aren't wholely incompetent? 😋

Or I'm past it 😋