Avatar
bkb2443
70b8a9f06094f933f16d5e123952245c825028eee3b1a949415767aab8e5c288
Bitcoiner AnCap
Replying to Avatar WilliamHodl

Meh back then you likely lose them in mt gox

Replying to Avatar Jeff Swann

Or us sad northerners

Peter Schiff would be interesting if we are talking a non bitcoiner

Yes but if my cyber speech ought to be decentralized and code is speech then my code ought to be decentralized

I mean git. Replication of repos only scales to as many people as work on the project. A large amount of libraries are worked on by only a handful of people and all of them eventually get to some central origin.

GitHub is of course the main centralizing force, but repos aren't decentralized by birthright, only when more people work on them.

After watching today's #nostrica sessions, here's my strongly held opinion, git isn't that decentralized. I don't have statistics, but most repos are on exactly 2 computers, the engineers and the central server. Many are on just a handful of computers.

Git is distributed but I wouldn't call it decentralized in it's current iteration.

Do shitposts and other notes count?

On a serious note this is mind boggling and is clearly just denialism from a crumbling system

Watching #nostrica even virtually is such a white pill.

Bitcoiners version of not a lot of money because of low time preference is not nearly the same as a normie