Do you have PGP and release signatures nostr:npub1exv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9csm7d828? Can't find them
GM!
#FreeAssange
nostr:note1aud5sqphpfktkys86l5cszdf7c863zep29sht2w4ktk3mx8h3wdshnlfy6
The lack of austrian economics for so long is the reason there is an oligopoly in distribution
Why do people go to fucking supermarkets though? why not buy real food from local producers?
Yes, I meant complexity for devs might make it hard to get traction (that's what nostr got right).
Have you written elsewhere about potential sybil attacks on a Grapevine? I'd like to understand what those parameters are and why they are needed.
Back in high school, about 20 years ago, we used to sell alfajores for $0.20 ARS. Today, I bought the same alfajor for 290 ARS.
Our "money" lost its value 1500x.
nostr:note1xqtxkcu2l3dg2rqwtvj4a7qzw0s7h6g5k925wnzeza7qm2ex6jusc2ssrj
Exactly! Free marketing for nostr
Patagonia is not a bad place to be 😄
Sorry I was never notified of your messages! I am getting your idea of the web of trust now. Totally on board explicit trust attestations and that zaps, likes, etc are useless because they can be gamed.
I'm on the fence re: hierarchies in practice as it seems useful but hard and rigid (even starting with baby steps). Had a look at tapestry and it looks interesting but definitely a rabbit hole in itself, I'll have to dive into it later. I fear making this even slightly complex will result in little traction.
My current idea revolves around simple trust attestations ("vouching for someone", I attest to the best of my current knowledge that this person has integrity - they're not a scammer or a psycho). Optionally with a few generic categories like (a) known them for years, (b) met them in person, (c) known them online, etc. I have ideas for UX around the creation of such events.
My current thinking is that hierarchy is an orthogonal concept, like if they know a lot about plumbing but nothing about cars or developing apps. Putting those two things together (hierarchy + trust) has to be probably done at the point of decision (which is how we do it IRL) and not be pre-calculated, and can be helped by (wot-filtered) reviews which are instantiations of both.
GM! what do you mean by making it work on the backend?
🤣 i've been using the same one
nostr:note1t2jvt5vpusrwrxkfu8x8r7q65zzvm32xuur6y7am4zn475r8ucjqmwwhd2
Milei sucking FATF's dick like a true whore, he's now afraid of the country ending up in a "grey list" of a tiny unelected global organization
Is this how "lions" behave?
nostr:note138e47n47fnky5zxmwxfjljy09keevxyj5pxktv49rlssnuvaxpasx6p05u
More war, more printing, same bitcoin
nostr is comms for enemies
nostr:note1l95yg4xkh8r0m4sg2yzkf86hqaahhuypcvu52c9vd0kag9qpjd9saclqu4
GM ☀️
The EU bureaucrats can go fuck themselves
All good, appreciate your insights
Oh ok, that's something different indeed. Cool.
Actually sounds like a feature for nostr:npub1mutnyacc9uc4t5mmxvpprwsauj5p2qxq95v4a9j0jxl8wnkfvuyque23vg group chats 🤔
Makes a ton of sense
I don't think we're talking about the same thing.
Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "market". I'm only interested in my close connections knowing that I want something be paid with their cards, and give them sats (with a premium perhaps) for that
I don't even think it should be a VC funded business, just an open tool for coordination


