For 1 sat to be worth 1$, Bitcoin will have to worth 100,000,000$.
One hundred million.
https://m.primal.net/HPlD.mp4Getting bombarded with what looks like a SPAM attack of fake followers. Anyone else seeing this? What's the best way to limit something like this?
Curious if (because the protocol is completely open) a small POW (aka hashcash) be a viable deterrent for brand new accounts and maybe the first 10 posts or something. This could make it easier to allow all new accounts without prejudice, and very little friction for the user, while preventing someone from just coming in and mass creating 1,000s of accounts and posting mountains of spam. (could even make them bitcoin block hashes that are handed to the primary relay, maybe one day after years of this some relay wins a totally random block reward š¤£)
For any accounts that make it past the initial "POW zone" and still end up spamming relentlessly, could just be managed on a per occurrence basis. I suspect a simple barrier like this would likely prevent the overwhelming majority of the problem. š¤š¤
By the way, Amethyst display follower count, but if you switch to the actual follower list, it somehow filters them. i think it does this based on Block reports ? nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z ?
btc has outperformed every other coin this year.
It doesn't even need to, to be a better investment, but it has.
Other coins follow.
For 7.8 seconds I thought Zendaya was on Nostr.
You're beautiful.
In a way, developing countries that have their debts tied to natural resources end up in a better situation than un tamed spending.
Fees have been high, might be a precaution wallet side.
https://m.primal.net/HPlD.mp4Getting bombarded with what looks like a SPAM attack of fake followers. Anyone else seeing this? What's the best way to limit something like this?
Curious if (because the protocol is completely open) a small POW (aka hashcash) be a viable deterrent for brand new accounts and maybe the first 10 posts or something. This could make it easier to allow all new accounts without prejudice, and very little friction for the user, while preventing someone from just coming in and mass creating 1,000s of accounts and posting mountains of spam. (could even make them bitcoin block hashes that are handed to the primary relay, maybe one day after years of this some relay wins a totally random block reward š¤£)
For any accounts that make it past the initial "POW zone" and still end up spamming relentlessly, could just be managed on a per occurrence basis. I suspect a simple barrier like this would likely prevent the overwhelming majority of the problem. š¤š¤
Pay to follow ?
https://m.primal.net/HPlD.mp4Getting bombarded with what looks like a SPAM attack of fake followers. Anyone else seeing this? What's the best way to limit something like this?
Curious if (because the protocol is completely open) a small POW (aka hashcash) be a viable deterrent for brand new accounts and maybe the first 10 posts or something. This could make it easier to allow all new accounts without prejudice, and very little friction for the user, while preventing someone from just coming in and mass creating 1,000s of accounts and posting mountains of spam. (could even make them bitcoin block hashes that are handed to the primary relay, maybe one day after years of this some relay wins a totally random block reward š¤£)
For any accounts that make it past the initial "POW zone" and still end up spamming relentlessly, could just be managed on a per occurrence basis. I suspect a simple barrier like this would likely prevent the overwhelming majority of the problem. š¤š¤
same. No way 160+ ppl are following me.
She has fiat face. No worries, you will win.
nostr:npub1fl7pr0azlpgk469u034lsgn46dvwguz9g339p03dpetp9cs5pq5qxzeknp nostr:npub1s0fs9dwztm2rukm42vh6df4a5gwykclf75tgyeuc75t0cs2eh8rsu2rqf5
Does the west have an economy ?
I invite you to sit with that question for a moment. It's kind of an odd question. Odder still is the statement: "...The west does not have an economy." It would be so easy to dismiss that statement.
Think about that word.
Greek oikonomia "household management, thrift...".
The old meaning of the word implied, "saving" , spending sparsely. The modern expansion on the meaning is more about large systems and their interactions and less about their budgets or austerity.
Just sit with that for a few moments and how that affects how we think about the direction of society and ourselves in it, in the first place.
We already do not operate in an economy. Economists are not experts in nor do they study an economy. They study spending.
The suggested antonym for economy is "waste" or "Extravangance", no direct latin opposite exist, that is how alien our situation is.
Perhaps we are thus in an Ex-onomy, with Exonomist experts advsing policy, making news media, directing war.
All pretence of former things are completely gone. An entirely new science is needed to study this artificial thing. Unrestrained Excess means unrestrained death.
Yes, we could spend 1 trillion on war and convert the world to Coca-Cola, but why ? If for instance, synthetic direvatives and insured debt, CBDC's, Peta-billions in interest payments actually work, and "save" the economy, it will not really be economic, will it ?
We need new words, new science, new language.
Amazing. Bitcoin will pump.
Like rehypothication ?
The European Parliament and Member States just reached an agreement on introducing the #DigitalIdentity paving the way for #CBDC, #SocialCreditScore and the #BioState.
#DigitalID #EU #TheGreatReset #Technocracy
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/european-politician-breaks-very-bad
Everyone will be a slave and no one will care because they will be on drugs, including the people who kill.
The European Parliament and Member States just reached an agreement on introducing the #DigitalIdentity paving the way for #CBDC, #SocialCreditScore and the #BioState.
#DigitalID #EU #TheGreatReset #Technocracy
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/european-politician-breaks-very-bad
They have to do it. Only way to keep entitlements going.
Notes held prisoner by Twitter.
nostr:npub1nevsewvjqhrsmpfcpdqw6v3e9f6z8w9sq0yt8kpndk2cumw8g6hs5mjmve Organic proof of horizontal transfer out of Ethereum in to Bitcoin.
It proves people and devs would rather be in Bitcoin.
Toxics will ignore this because they don't like the underlying product, NFT's, and miss the point.
Drivechain and Bip300 will do this for everything, anywhere else , benefiting everyone on the network.
Little known easter egg in the Bitcoin code is that if you send sats to satosin@gmx.com the fed dies like tomorrow.
What's interesting to me is how far out of known shores we are. In metaphorical terms we have not just lost sight of land, historical reference, we have entered a wormhole and landed in an ocean on an alien world.
No other civilization on record, has created this much debt, for this many people, this wide accross the planet. Add technology, digital, bitcoin, communications, ai. Add shifting political lines and powers. Add entrenched legacy systems, laws and justifications for things like borders, race, language, that seem anachonistic in comparison to the connections and distributions available.
An example: Several people have suggested that power is shifting to the east. Russia/China/India will be the new Canada/U.s/Mexico of the east. But what language will these new powers have to do all this in ? The suggestion of anything but English would start a fight. When the Romans took over Greek power, Latin became dominant throughtout. Not Greek.
A.i Translation means , there will likely not be a new dominant language. Everyone can conduct business in their own language, or refer to English. Even in a shared power structure with the east.
A new language may emerge FROM that state of affairs, but the difference is in organic emergence versus forced adoption/assimilation.
To say uncharted is an understatement.
Mindfullness is extremely important.
