79
Dullahan
791340ee053aa79451b4a596d901ee594136a3cac7a25536f6438e35a104b977

Drug abuse is bad, porn abuse is bad, game abuse is bad.

Does it mean games deserve to be labeled as corrosive to your mental health? I don't think so. And gaming also has shown signs of spreading spontaneously in good ways.

But the good thing is that even if alcohol and other drugs are bad and so, shaming (which leads to censorship and abolition) won't do any good to society in general, and we have enough experience to detect that kind of events.

A different thing is the moral background of people. If you feel disturbed about porn and its outcomes, I respect that and promote the fact that you can mute and curate what you don't want to see. I also have some moral in my mind and don't like to see certain things.

Then, why did pornography emerged over the Internet as a pioneer in a lot of developments? Do you think it was financed by an evil almighty state or was an spontaneous phenomenon over Internet?

I say all of this because I saw a brief rise of stable diffusion hentai a few months ago and saw how Google completely censored it and tried to eradicate it. I think it's because they are frightened. They would no longer be able to feed us terribly fake bodies and gender ideologies (and related topics) to make us sick of our biological insticts.

In the end, I think AI will win. Google has no moat. Google won't tiktok our instincts.

Replying to Avatar Melvin Carvalho

Actually I think a peaceful resolution is the most likley path.

The BIP has had wide review, and there is not community appetite for it at this time. There are some holes in it imho, they could tweak the proposal and come up with something better. But it might have to be a new group that pushes it.

Rightly or wrongly, 80% of the btc community is against it. There's just no way you can reverse that anytime soon. Even if you got 80% to switch, and I dont think anyone can do that, you still have enough to block it. Bear in mind you only need 6% consensus to veto all new side chains. There's a million ways to stop it, if it is the will of the community.

They wont get MASF, and even if they did, what then? You're really going to take on a $500 Bn eco system that doesnt want something with a bunch of nervious miners that dont really want to get involved in a war. Saylor on the mining committee has come out against.

Any hard fork would be crushed in a heartbeat. The trolling will die down, it will get blocked or diluted.

The BIP has been educational and asked some interesting questions. I even added a constructive proposal that might fix Paul's broken game theory. We will get stratumv2 in time, and many flavours of side chains I'm sure, and also strategies to help with the security budget.

Playing with the dials here is fun, and shows that between now and 2032 there is work to be done in hardening the tail emssion. It's good for everyone because higher security leads to higher price, and a longer life for bitcoin. Something that everyone wants.

https://www.btcsecuritybudget.com/

Here is a pretty informative video of why people shouldn't mess with miner incentives. I recommend it to everyone to not try to invent imaginary problems or follow the narratives of those who do it:

https://youtu.be/Z2Znc5zkIhk?si=R8oDkzCL58axs8u4