Profile: 7b5c79d9...
nostr:npub1uxz060za0sz7uzncy45jcksak2lr9wks0hrgug54cvpm9ma8agkqs35ma4 nostr:npub1ec73me5a6pwv2lcwg6qxtugu6py6weh934w0muvngxup967x800qn3933z I'm not whether it's more likely Trump ends up hiding in protective custody or running a prison gang. Toss up.
nostr:npub178rvtslm3qykq8uy5afswta2qz5pk9atjxsepht4x8ldddssp6kq4sqekt nostr:npub1ec73me5a6pwv2lcwg6qxtugu6py6weh934w0muvngxup967x800qn3933z
Running a prison gang 😂
Oh gosh.
nostr:npub1uxz060za0sz7uzncy45jcksak2lr9wks0hrgug54cvpm9ma8agkqs35ma4 nostr:npub1ec73me5a6pwv2lcwg6qxtugu6py6weh934w0muvngxup967x800qn3933z Also, as far as the barrier to imprisonment, the statute says that the Secret Service protects former presidents, but it doesn't specify HOW they must accomplish that. It would probably be legally sufficient for them to work with prison authorities to develop and approve a plan for protecting him, without having to have a 24 hr personal USSS bodyguard in physical proximity.
nostr:npub178rvtslm3qykq8uy5afswta2qz5pk9atjxsepht4x8ldddssp6kq4sqekt nostr:npub1ec73me5a6pwv2lcwg6qxtugu6py6weh934w0muvngxup967x800qn3933z
I'm sure there is a workaround.
Some prisoners are more vulnerable to attack from other inmates, but I can't see Trump really mingling, right?
Adding: I've known cases of inmates attacked by prison guards.
. . . it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case."
It is subtly aggressive: It puts the unhinged post in front of the judge.
2/
Here is the DOJ request for a protective order:
This isn't a big deal. It basically says, "Look at these unhinged things that Trump is posting in social media. He needs to be reminded that the cannot
improperly disseminate grand jury discovery material. (#1)
It poses a hypothetical.
"If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details—or, for example, grand jury transcripts—obtained in discovery here. . .
1/
Oh, I think we could leave it to prison authorities to keep him safe, just like we do for other convicted criminals. This is a 100% fake conundrum.
If Trump is convicted, Secret Service protection may be obstacle to imprisonment https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/04/trump-criminal-cases-prison-secret-service/
nostr:npub1ec73me5a6pwv2lcwg6qxtugu6py6weh934w0muvngxup967x800qn3933z
Secret service for life is by statute:
https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/former-presidents.html
I didn't research whether retroactively changing this statute would violate the ex post facto prohibition, but my gut tells me that it would. It's not a criminal statute, but change the consequences for behavior.
But I didn't do the research, just going from gut.
nostr:npub135d09thfh03cpu03rr9tk0kluy6suvf97afeajgsywzfgl0y973qvjtg9k nostr:npub1kp3mm4y2p6zdrsu5ca5e5drlcyppd4scsp9nn5atux6n29zek02qmyfk0h
Thanks. That's who I was thinking.
I wonder if that was him.
It's been a long day so my brain isn't completely operating at 100%
So, looks like the next E. Jean Carroll trial is January.
The Manhattan hush money criminal trial is March.
The stolen documents criminal trial is May.
And we are expecting indictments from Georgia and the January 6 grand jury imminently.
He will be on trial all through the primary season.
@d0c40r0@nicecrew.digital
Blocked. How did all of these people find me?
What person finds pleasure in writing that word?