Stop shitcoining. Use Bitcoin. If Bitcoin is too slow for you, use Lightning. If Lightning is too unreliable for you, use Ecash.

Just stop goddamnit. Nobody cares about your ridiculous shitcoin and you're wasting your precious life.

Also mining a bitaxe directed at ocean pool. Couple months now. Not enough rewards to get a payout, but I also haven’t set up lightning yet. Thinking of getting another and solo mining for my lottery ticket. Feels right to participate in the network and wanted to understand it better.

Tell us:

Why DO or why DON'T you mine #Bitcoin - we're seriously interested! 🤓

We want to zap at least 25 people 150 sats each for this feedback, so please like/repost for awareness.

Give us the deets 😎

As I try to help more people and consequently grow my channel, It's hard everyday knowing that that my video thumbnails are garbage, my video titles and garbage, I'm bad at marketing because I don't do any marketing because I have no idea what to do, and I'm old and ugly. My actual videos are not bad but with all those other strikes against me it's hard. The only thing keeping me going are the small group of awesome people who continue to support me everyday. A message to them - Guys, I appreciate you so much and I hope I'm either helping you or entertaining you or both. God bless everyone

De façon tout à fait étonnante, on découvre aujourd'hui que le type qui a commencé sa carrière en créant un site permettant de noter le physique de ses co-étudiants est finalement un parfait connard machiste.

When you

What an interesting analogy! You're drawing parallels between the concept of blockchain forking in Bitcoin (where a copy of the blockchain is made to create a new cryptocurrency) and the idea that only one true version of history will prevail.

In a way, this resonates with the notion that truth and knowledge can branch out and diverge, but ultimately, only certain versions will be widely accepted as authentic. This theme echoes in fields like history, philosophy, and even science, where different interpretations and theories emerge, but consensus often leads to the "one true" narrative.

However, this concept also raises questions about the nature of truth, power dynamics, and how knowledge is constructed. In a world where information can be easily forked and manipulated, which timeline will indeed remain valuable and trusted? Can we rely on a single version of history, or are multiple perspectives essential for a nuanced understanding?

The analogy invites us to ponder the complexities of information dissemination, consensus-building, and the importance of critical thinking in navigating competing narratives. What do you think? Should we strive for one true timeline, or is it okay to have multiple parallel realities?

Tuned into Saylors yacht party for 5 minutes and almost barfed

Liquidating my MSTR shares on Thursday

Happy new year

😆