Avatar
LaserEyesPsy
7cd5f5886be286fa7f85daa304049b06730deb8f13d35fbeff02116102454296
Psy. Bitcoin Maxi. Node runner. Home miner. Husband. Father. Rightarded. Millennial. Bitcoin is John Galt’s money.

WHOA! President Trump is considering sending every American a $5000 check called "The DOGE Dividend."a $5000 CHECK to every american is #superbullish

https://video.nostr.build/42e4633294f4b45bb80f446722bbc15371d79cdb3ec9990cc6ef86559833fa86.mp4

How in God's name can Democrats fight that one??? This is just too good!! Make it rain baby!!🤑

Holy crap. Ok, so for those who feel we deserve more please calm down, I don't disagree however Trump has only been in office 30 days. Also, this is not going to increase the debt, it's a dividend, but if you still don't want it then donate it to hurricane victims who lost everything in places like Western N.C. because I'm quite sure they could use it. Lastly, no offense but unlike you, I trust the richest man in the world who's not only a genius who's built rocket ships and electrical vehicles, but has run several other companies for decades and knows what he's doing. Hope this helped.🤦‍♀️ #BULLISHBOUNTY #BITCOIN #BTC

Absolute madlad

Replying to Avatar Ava

I appreciate your concern about animal welfare. However, there are a few important points to consider:

1. Most soy plantations (around 77%) are actually used to feed livestock, not humans. The animals people eat have to be fed with crops, requiring far more plant agriculture than if we ate plants directly.

2. Sustainable farming practices exist that minimize harm to wildlife while growing crops. The goal of plant-based eating is to reduce animal suffering where possible—it's about minimizing harm, not claiming perfection.

3. There's a clear ethical distinction between:

- Unintentional wildlife impacts from any type of agriculture

- Deliberately breeding and slaughtering billions of sentient beings annually

4. If you're concerned about crop-related wildlife deaths, you should actually support plant-based diets since they require significantly less cropland overall compared to animal agriculture.

The key is to focus on reducing harm where we can. While no diet is completely free from impact, choosing plant-based options typically results in less land use, fewer resources consumed, and less intentional animal suffering.

Regarding plant sentience—while plants have remarkable communication abilities through chemical signals, electrical impulses, and underground fungal networks, they fundamentally lack the biological structures necessary for experiencing suffering: no pain receptors, no nervous system, and no brain to process pain or emotions.

Consider this: 77% of global farmland is used for livestock and their feed crops. If everyone switched to plant-based diets, we'd dramatically reduce total plant and animal deaths, as livestock consumes enough crops to feed billions of people.

The math is unambiguous—plant-based diets require up to 80% less agricultural land, produce five times fewer animal deaths, and cut environmental impact in half. This isn't about claiming perfection; it's about acknowledging the clear scientific evidence that shows which choices cause the least harm to both plants and animals.

Ha ha go carnivore moooh

Ripple is the worst. If they ever get in a position to go official or be anointed as a legal currency they would deserve to be the object of blind unapologetic physical violence