Avatar
BitcoinBeliever
7e1d20be55a3d06c75f60f80eec94092a1b2c5903b835d5265e634e80b4a42c2
The Path of Bitcoin is good. That's why it is not easy. It is not easy, that's why it is good.

Running shitcoin casino, also.

Ain't nobody got enough sats, except the man that got to 1 BTC and once he got to 1 BTC, then he just stopped following all BTC news, stopped shitposting, stopped caring, stopped worrying. Men such as this, are the wisest of all.

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

I like conspiracies. I just thought of a frightening one. What if, all along, the plan of Craig Wrong was to lose this obviously flimsy case, but then go ahead and launch defamation lawsuits on all bitcoiners who memed him (basically all of us) and take all our corn! oO

๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ด ๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—•๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ผ?

I usually only answer this question with a chuckle, but in light of todayโ€™s trial with the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), it seems a good time to fully weigh-in on this issue.

This question is so ridiculous, I intend this to be the ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜บ time I will give it any serious consideration.

Craig Wright's claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of #Bitcoin, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€. Unlike Satoshi, who was deeply involved in Bitcoin's early development, Wright appeared ๐˜บ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ด later, and with ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐˜†๐—น๐—ฒโ€”verbose and error-proneโ€”compared to Satoshi's concise technicality.

Satoshi's online presence was ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ญ, focusing on development rather than publicity. Wright, conversely, actively seeks media attention. His actions, including attempts to control Bitcoinโ€™s shared ledger, the blockchain, starkly contrast with Satoshi's decentralization ethos. Furthermore, ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐˜†๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต.

Evidence supporting Wright's claim is unconvincing. If he really were Satoshi, he could have proved it long ago by publicly signing a message using Satoshiโ€™s private key, but he has failed to do so. ๐˜๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ด ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜‰๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ'๐˜ด ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ด, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜š๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ. Consequently, Bitcoiners largely view Wright's assertions with skepticism, questioning his motives.

In sum, his discrepancies in involvement, writing, and principles, along with a complete lack of hard evidence, make it ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. One could even say that ๐—ถ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ'๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜†, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ด ๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ผ.

Be sure to ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐Ÿค™ and ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐Ÿ”„ this, and save it in your ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€๐Ÿ”–

What do you think? Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? Why or why not?

Write your answer in the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€โฌ‡๏ธ

Craig Wrong is Satoshi Cacamoto

Fun Fact: Did you know that after inventing Bitcoin in 2009-2010, Doctored Satoshi Whackamoto went ahead and got a Cisco CCNA Certification in 2011?