"Life is a distributed object system. However, communication among humans is a distributed hypermedia system, where the mind's intellect, voice+gestures, eyes+ears, & imagination are all components".
--- Roy T. Fielding, 1998
https://youtu.be/5LYt4H6xA-g?si=DTWQiX0Ic-BuMu9d nostr:note12h00eelx23psuhjmmfpcjkgxhmw6gya8hghgyg2e3j5z2gv8t9vqf76zyl
Non-custodial Lightning Address server with base layer support too using Nostr protocol..
-Easy to use
-Log in with Nostr
-No need to run a node
DVFS Frequently Leaks Secrets: 'Hertzbleed Attacks Beyond SIKE, Cryptography, and CPU-Only Data' by
Yingchen Wang, Riccardo Paccagnella, Alan Wandke, Zhao Gang, Grant Garrett-Grossman, Christopher W. Fletcher, David Kohlbrenner, Hovav Shacham.
Sentinel Chains: A Novel Two-Way Peg. By nostr:npub19pw5egjuhcsfsv42zkjtjs6nhpm69lnv8w2dacdyez7rvacrqnds6xjtwk
https://ursuscamp.github.io/bitcoin/2023/08/10/sidechains.html
What safeguards can be implemented to ensure the security & integrity of both mainchains & sidechains ? ??? nostr:note1yvue6cy94nv280yuttv855dyfaca5dwh5ccjz2d52vc6j9j4wf4s2jqumk
If a drivechain becomes a threat to the mainchain, it's likely that a significant number of users & stakeholders are benefiting from it. So, the cost of buying miners might be substantial & incentives for such an action would need to be carefully considered.
Why??
If the drivechain employs a different consensus algorithm from Bitcoin's, attempting to control it through miner acquisition might not be feasible & Sidechains, which are designed to operate semi-independently, governance & decision-making processes of a drivechain may differ from those of the Bitcoin mainchain. Thus, the mere act of buying miners might not lead to the desired outcome of terminating the drivechain.
'Understanding binary-Goppa decoding' by Daniel J. Bernstein.
It’s only a matter of time before the great promise of Bitcoin would be translated into reality for the world's billions. And when you believe in it despite the gagging, you can be reassured that you have lost nothing at all… 
Still the delirium of the powerful who spreads in prevarications & who thinks everything is allowed? I therefore remain blind to this crash! But can degrade savings... What’s not advantageous! 
If the problem of scalability or even the reduction of protocol congestion should be weighed, I find that there could be an improvement in the scalability of the blockchain by unloading part of the transactional load on separate chains. This can also contribute to the reduction of mainchain congestion, the growth in the use of the blockchain & therefore lead to faster & more reliable transactions in these 3rd world regions with limited Internet connectivity & higher latency so where demand for low-cost & efficient transactions is important, further, economic growth & job creation...
So, it would be better to conceive this change by focusing on the positive impacts of innovation & personalization, not the fact that it can benefit maxis or anything else evoking a contentious vote or indexing miners.
Obviously, it’s important to critically assess any proposed changes to a blockchain system & although it’s true that more options can potentially lead to more conflicts, why couldn’t we look at the considerations & highlight the potential benefits of Drivechain & sidechains, in particular driving innovation & support the growth of 3rd World regions ?
If sidechains can respond to various use cases without having to modify the consensus rules of the mainchain, they could be adapted to specific regions or industries, i.e. different communities or regions of 3rd world, can customize their own sidechains to address financial inclusion, supply chain transparency or identity verification.
Drivechain leverages the immense hashpower & network effect of the Bitcoin mainchain. This ensures that the security of sidechains is directly tied to Bitcoin's security, making it extremely difficult for malicious actors to attack or compromise sidechains.
This distinct security advantage can make Drivechain a more robust & secure option compared to isolated L2 solutions on Ethereum.
Finally, if we closely analyze the security commodities & the proportions on which the Ethereum ecosystem is based. nostr:note1hmujwh69h6nnkdvhtt7ykae9h5kds9ykz2khw5eu3qmysss40kns3c4ugq
Ethereum's approach involves on-chain execution of smart contracts & applications, which still lead to network congestion & high fees during periods of high demand.
Drivechain's architecture facilitates scalability by offloading complex & resource-intensive operations to sidechains. Ain’t only reduces congestion on the mainchain but also allows for greater efficiency in executing various functions.
The proof-of-work security of the main Bitcoin chain further strengthens Drivechain's security guarantees, making it a robust solution for both scalability & decentralization. 
Critics argue that #Drivechain might lead to miners accumulating disproportionate wealth due to MEV… Humm!
Let’s say that Drivechain introduces a unique economic model that aligns with Bitcoin's principles. By enabling miners to operate both the mainchain & sidechain, miners' incentives are more balanced.
Otherwise, Drivechain concept focuses on decentralized mechanisms for sidechain security, potentially reducing MEV by decentralizing the processing of transactions. Drivechain's design can mitigate MEV issues that have been highlighted in Ethereum's context. 
'Batch Proofs of Partial Knowledge' by Ryan Henry & Ian Goldberg.
A batch techniques that make a larger variety of complex ZKPs more efficient.
nostr:npub17rlc0emedw5xljztfqrmykjaacsx6ujvdas64zznjadrnhhwlavq4jjtgg Check this... Old stuff but can be used as a study to guide someone who wants to learn more about the workings of the PGP..
https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-europe-05/bh-eu-05-callas-up.pdf
Proof of Last Transaction Control aligns the interests of the custody group & the broader blockchain community in maintaining the security & integrity of the system… nostr:note1yj2n2zdmwzfjxvn4ltl8v99fu7azwwj7mjkz8fapxcttf0xygljsa92fpk