Do you mean vows by chance?

Otherwise, I don’t think ChatGPT would be necessary.

The wedding vowels are just e and i

lol many would I’m sure. Not gonna lie I tested it for a wedding speech I did recently. But my version was better lol

Recently gave a speech as a Best Man, 100% self written and made jokes about how in a few years I’d be replaced by ChatGPT, seemed to go well.

To me it should be fun, albeit stressful certainly, to write them.

No. To be honest, if anything has to be even slightly personal… I prefer doing it solely myself.

And I am an AVID, daily AI user, but some things just need my personal touch. 🤝💚

*not written with ChatGPT 🤣

Does this feels like a draw down to you ? You privelaged ...

#askNostr

Any value system needs sufficient distribution. A coin that is owned only by one guy or a couple of guys is worth nothing. They have the problem with USD and with any other shitcoin. If there is vanishing demand for a currency it collapses.

Only Bitcoin (so far), Ethereum? and Monero have seen widespread distribution. Outside if that it's only speculation.

Making Bitcoin less distributed beyond a certain point will make it less and less interesting.

Using leverage to buy it with worthless fiat is another story that won't collapse Bitcoin. It'll ust produce another volatile cycle which is good for speculators but further hinders use as money.

I don't know which lodge exactly, yet. But this is far to elaborate and tolerated to be the play of a single CEO.

Any value system needs sufficient distribution. A coin that is owned only by one guy or a couple of guys is worth nothing. They have the problem with USD and with any other shitcoin. If there is vanishing demand for a currency it collapses.

Only Bitcoin (so far), Ethereum? and Monero have seen widespread distribution. Outside if that it's only speculation.

Making Bitcoin less distributed beyond a certain point will make it less and less interesting.

Using leverage to buy it with worthless fiat is another story that won't collapse Bitcoin. It'll ust produce another volatile cycle which is good for speculators but further hinders use as money.

I don't know which lodge exactly, yet. But this is far to elaborate and tolerated to be the play of a single CEO.

I think it's talking about the weights AIs use. When you feed it all the training data, it gives back weights that are basically weighted probabilities for giving results to prompts. Every word in a prompt gets checked against the weights and overall form a sort of path towards the result you get.

He's meant to bring Bitcoin down. That's his assigned role by the lodge.

BULLISH.

He will be humbled eventually. He's greedy. No one to admire.