there is clearly a material difference, yes, and, to be fair, I did say itās not *as* stupid and not *as* fraudulent.
but closer inspection doesnāt paint a much rosier picture: there is no reason to believe these assets will retain their original value, against which they were leveraged on an already razor-thin equity buffer. SVBās book in liquid securities is marked to market, not to expected future cash flow, so we really donāt know how much money theyāll recover. which of course ties right back to the absurdity of fiat because the original value obviously reflected their monetisation on account of artificially low rates. will that return? I have no idea, but itās hardly prudent capital allocation to blindly assume the answer is yes.
also, ~10 years is an obscene amount of time to have hundreds of billions of dollars locked up in bankruptcy proceedings. *especially* the coming 10 years, over which I would strongly wager the dollar face value will go to shit in real terms (to whit, see above). thatās before even needing to invoke time value of money - itās not even that there might be better assets with better return profiles to swap into in markets you used to think were liquid. itās that you just donāt want these ones at all. it has turned into a 10-year zero-coupon, illiquid fixed nominal return. ew.
so in some sense you are right on a technicality. but in another, this is the absurdity of fiat banking in a nutshell: the losses *have always already happened* - they just arenāt evenly distributed.
haha yes, there is a nonzero chance these mythical reserves exist.
thatās still a fraction. itās 1/ā
āvaccine hesitancyā is such an insidious euphemism. you cannot take anybody seriously who says this unironically. in fact, you should assume malice.
thatās an interesting point. it does seem questionably constitutional to impose a tax on a private activity of a good that has already been paid for. the economic transaction in question is for āpowerā not āhashingā.
I realise, btw, that trying to be reasonable about this is probably the wrong approach, but it at least makes me feel warm and fuzzy.
you guys realise that SVB was/is literally punting around in liquid securities markets, right? this is the insanity that fiat brings to ābankingā - commercial banks have to fail because raising the everything price hits their book of mortgage backed securities (I canāt even believe Iām typing this itās so stupid) because there isnāt enough of a yield in making *actual loans* and the maturity mismatch is too scary anyway. SVB is FTX, just with mildly less stupid and fraudulent shitcoins - but stupid and fraudulent shitcoins nonetheless. so is every other ābankā.
fuck me sideways. it causes me acute emotional distress that people think this is normal and donāt see any problem with it. we live in such a clown world š¤¦āāļø
no, just make something up and I guarantee you reality is that, but a bit worse.
fractional reserve banking, amiright?
I think the optimal strategy is to pay lip service to the totalitarians at the federal level, but do everything possible at the state and even local level to sabotage their efforts and support bitcoin. the reason being that getting too aggressive too soon will invite violent pushback before it can be effectively resisted. if we wait long enough, they literally wonāt have the budget for violence, and they will be preoccupied with the collapse of the social fabric in their cities.
bitcoin is going to drive secession (and not just in the US)
no, we are going to win because of people doing, not talking.
there literally is no plan. thatās the point.
so Iāve basically given up ever arguing with normies about bitcoin coz I feel like I put in a good shift and itās not rewarding anymore. occasionally Iāll dive back in if the idiot in question is famous enough for the audience to make it worthwhile. but for the most part my attitude is that it just doesnāt matter: we are going to win, and it doesnāt matter whether or not the high priests of fiat understand what is happening.
but I just realised something pretty hilarious. the high priests of fiat *really do think this matters* because, in their clown world, winning the argument literally is affecting reality. thatās how fiat works: whoever convinces the most, and the most important, people, gets to do what they want with the money.
itās not about accurately reflecting reality. itās not about capturing time or causation. itās not about being mindful of unintended consequences. itās entirely about *sounding* impressive.
itās pretty fun to think about how this will play out as the collapse of fiat accelerates. my prediction is they will get louder and louder, thinking this grants more and more influence over the reality that is increasingly spiralling out of their, and anybodyās else, control.
and when they try to argue, Iāll just shrug.
ābut can we fix it faster than itās falling apart?ā
- #[0]ā
this was said pretty flippantly in his chat with Kelly but it hit me hard š¢
I love the smell of undeplatformable wrongthink in the morning
mrs allen just made a hilarious observation about the US covid āvaccineā border control: you need to be āvaccinatedā if you are coming by air and as a tourist. if you cross by land, youāre fine, and if you are an immigrant, youāre fine.
so the only people it really applies to are those from rich countries that bought a shit load of āvaccinesā from the US and dared not to take it. it has sweet fuck all to do with āscienceā or even common sense, but itās also not just kinda dumb and not well thought through: itās explicitly political. itās a punishment.
my alternative theory is that you canāt have people running around both talking about and proving by their very existence that significantly less insane āvaccineā regimes exist in just as developed countries and everybody is not only fine, but better. but that suggests a lot more nuance than I think these clowns are capable of. mrs allen is probably right.
not as exciting, sorry. I will die on this hill. 2006 was the all time peak.
sometimes I like to just look at the lineups of the 2006 World Cup final and marvel at how unbelievably good both teams were š
but without the government who would pay for tinkering with infectious diseases in labs and releasing them into the public?
Jim Thorpe, the worldās greatest athlete and all-around swell guy.