I asked GPT to provide me with an analysis of todays Bank of Canada’s communications to the public. Here is what I got back:
Here is a cleaned up and organized version of the news event in bullet points:
- The Bank of Canada (BoC) has released its latest Financial System Review (FSR), which assesses the state of the country's financial system and identifies potential risks and vulnerabilities.
- The FSR identifies three key vulnerabilities in the financial system: cyber threats, imbalances in the housing market, and the potential for a sudden rise in long-term interest rates.
- The BoC notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of cybersecurity, as more people have shifted to remote work and online activities.
- The FSR also highlights the rapid increase in housing prices in some markets, which could lead to household debt levels becoming unsustainable and a sharp correction in the housing market.
- The BoC warns that mortgage payments could rise by up to 8% by mid-2022 due to rising interest rates and increasing home prices.
- The report notes that many households have taken on more debt during the pandemic, and that a significant share of mortgages will renew at higher interest rates over the next year.
- Higher mortgage payments could lead to increased financial strain for some households, which could in turn lead to higher loan defaults and a broader economic downturn.
- The report also highlights the risks posed by the growing popularity of non-bank mortgage lenders, which may not be subject to the same regulatory oversight as traditional banks.
- The BoC concludes that while the financial system is currently stable, it will continue to monitor these vulnerabilities and take action if necessary to maintain financial stability.
- Tiff Macklem, the Governor of the Bank of Canada, has stressed the need for vigilance in the face of risks to Canada's financial system.
- Macklem pointed to household debt as a key risk, noting that it has risen to historic highs during the pandemic.
- He also mentioned the hot housing market, which has driven up prices and could lead to a correction in the future.
- Macklem highlighted the central bank's commitment to keeping inflation under control and noted that the recent surge in prices is likely temporary.
- He expressed optimism about the economic recovery, citing strong job growth and a rebound in consumer spending.
- However, he cautioned that the recovery is not yet complete and that the pandemic continues to pose risks to the economy.
- Macklem emphasized the importance of a strong and resilient financial system in supporting the recovery and ensuring long-term prosperity for Canadians.
- The Bank of Canada is encouraging financial institutions to continue to underwrite mortgages prudently and to ensure that borrowers are able to handle increases in interest rates.
- Overall, the Bank of Canada's report underscores the importance of continued vigilance and careful management of the Canadian housing market, both to ensure financial stability and to protect the interests of individual households.
---
Here are the worst-case implications for each of the points above:
1. The worst-case implication of the BoC's assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities is that there could be a significant financial crisis in Canada if these risks and vulnerabilities are not addressed in a timely and effective manner.
2. The worst-case implication of the three key vulnerabilities identified in the financial system is that any one of them could trigger a financial crisis that could have severe consequences for the Canadian economy.
3. The worst-case implication of the importance of cybersecurity is that a major cyber attack could disrupt financial systems, cause significant economic damage, and undermine public trust in financial institutions.
4. The worst-case implication of the rapid increase in housing prices in some markets and unsustainable household debt levels is that a sharp correction in the housing market could trigger a broader economic downturn, with significant job losses and financial distress for households.
5. The worst-case implication of a sudden rise in long-term interest rates is that high debt levels could become harder to service, leading to widespread defaults and a financial crisis.
6. The worst-case implication of the financial system's resilience during the pandemic is that there could be a false sense of security, leading to complacency and a failure to address underlying vulnerabilities.
7. The worst-case implication of the warning that mortgage payments could rise by up to 8% by mid-2022 is that many households could face financial strain and a significant increase in defaults, leading to a broader economic downturn.
8. The worst-case implication of the risks posed by non-bank mortgage lenders is that these lenders could engage in risky lending practices that could lead to a financial crisis.
9. There is no worst-case implication for the BoC's conclusion that the financial system is currently stable and that it will continue to monitor vulnerabilities. But if the claim that the financial system is stable is a lie and the system is actually unstable, it could have serious downstream implications. If the public is misled into believing that the financial system is stable when it is not, this could lead to a false sense of security and complacency, which could exacerbate the underlying risks and vulnerabilities in the system. In the worst-case scenario, this could lead to a financial crisis and a broader economic downturn, as the public loses confidence in financial institutions and begins to withdraw their deposits, leading to bank runs and other forms of financial panic. Therefore, it is important for the Bank of Canada to be transparent and honest about the state of the financial system, and to take action to address any underlying risks and vulnerabilities, in order to maintain public confidence and ensure financial stability.
10. The worst-case implication of the risk of household debt is that it could lead to widespread defaults, financial distress, and a broader economic downturn.
11. The worst-case implication of the hot housing market is that a correction could trigger a financial crisis and a broader economic downturn.
12. The worst-case implication of the central bank's commitment to keeping inflation under control is that it could lead to a prolonged period of low economic growth and high unemployment.
13. The worst-case implication of the recent surge in prices being temporary is that it could lead to complacency and a failure to address underlying inflationary pressures.
14. The worst-case implication of optimism about the economic recovery is that it could lead to complacency and a failure to address underlying risks and vulnerabilities.
15. The worst-case implication of the continued risks posed by the pandemic is that it could lead to a prolonged period of economic disruption, with significant job losses and financial distress for households.
16. The worst-case implication of the importance of a strong and resilient financial system is that a failure to maintain such a system could lead to a financial crisis and a broader economic downturn.
17. The worst-case implication of a failure to underwrite mortgages prudently and ensure that borrowers can handle interest rate increases is that it could lead to widespread defaults and a financial crisis.
18. The worst-case implication of a failure to manage the Canadian housing market carefully is that it could lead to a housing market crash, widespread defaults, and a broader economic downturn.
—-
There could be various critical interpretations of the Bank of Canada's communications, depending on the perspective and the specific issue in question. Here are a few examples:
1. Inflation: Critics have argued that the Bank of Canada's monetary policy, including its quantitative easing program, is contributing to inflation and exacerbating income inequality. These critics may interpret the Bank's communications as downplaying the risks of inflation and failing to acknowledge the negative consequences for households and businesses.
2. Housing Market: Critics have argued that the Bank of Canada is not doing enough to address the risks and vulnerabilities in the Canadian housing market, including the rapid increase in housing prices and unsustainable levels of household debt. These critics may interpret the Bank's communications as being too optimistic about the resilience of the housing market and failing to acknowledge the potential for a housing market crash.
3. Financial Stability: Critics have argued that the Bank of Canada is not doing enough to ensure the stability of the financial system, including the risks posed by non-bank mortgage lenders and the potential for a sudden rise in long-term interest rates. These critics may interpret the Bank's communications as downplaying the risks and vulnerabilities in the financial system and failing to take appropriate action to address them.
4. Environmental and Social Issues: Critics have argued that the Bank of Canada is not doing enough to address environmental and social issues, such as climate change and income inequality. These critics may interpret the Bank's communications as being too focused on traditional economic indicators and failing to acknowledge the broader social and environmental impacts of its policies.
These are just a few examples of the types of critical interpretations that could arise from the Bank of Canada's communications.
----
#Bitcoin fixes this.
——
Side note: Just so you all know, governments and certain vested interest groups would like to limit who has access Artificial Intelligence to analyze and understand the world around them. 
Despite the negative opinions of those who are critical of #Bitcoin , including those who are skeptical of its value, those who promote crypto scam currencies, those who benefit from traditional fiat currencies, and those who are stubbornly attached to gold as a valuable asset, know this:
Bitcoin is the most resilient and durable form of money in the history of human civilization. It's indiestructible. There is nothing humanly possible that can stop it.
Seethe and cope!
This is a revolution for the soul of humanity. The separation of money and the state is the ongoing story of the evolution of human rights. 
Funny because it's true. 😂
I got GPT to describe this hashtag I just made: #AnthropologyAmerica
Hashtags are often used to categorize and organize social media content, and their meanings can vary depending on the context and the individuals using them. In that context, #AnthropologyAmerica is used to describe instances in the intersection of anthropology and American culture or society.
The hashtag #AnthropologyAmerica is a critical or satirical way to comment on how American culture or society is perceived or portrayed by people outside of the United States.
There are many ways that American culture or society could be perceived satirically by people outside the United States, and these perceptions could vary depending on the individual or group making the commentary. Some common themes or stereotypes that have been used in satire or humor include:
1. The perceived emphasis on consumerism, materialism, and celebrity culture in American society.
2. The political system and perceived cultural divide, including the two-party system, campaign finance, and the influence of special interest groups.
3. The perceived obsession with guns and gun culture in the United States.
4. The stereotype of Americans as being loud, brash, and overly confident.
5. The perceived lack of knowledge or interest in other cultures outside of the United States.
It's important to note that these are stereotypes and generalizations, and not necessarily representative of the views or experiences of all people outside of the United States. Additionally, satire and humor can be used to highlight and critique societal issues or values, but it's important to approach these topics with sensitivity and respect. 
The Effective Altruists are at it again. This is the “any means necessary”, “for the greater good”, “the ends justify the means” crowd. Just another ideology that we have to contend with moving forward.
This is so good. 😂
Also, using the joke to make this argument:
Because it is worth pointing out that politicians often use verbal obfuscation techniques and language manipulations designed in compassionate-sounding jargon that is leveraged to groom unthinking people who can be persuaded to accept a particular agenda in order to form a consensus. This is not always easy to recognize, and by the time the masses have gathered with torches to lynch someone for wrong-think, it may already be too late.
Verbal manipulation and obfuscation are potent tools to persuade people. Fear-mongering can be a form of verbal manipulation, as it uses language to create an emotional response that bypasses critical thinking. Politicians and other influential figures often use this tactic to manipulate public opinion and shape their agendas.
Take the case of the pandemic as an example; politicians used compassionate language and fear-mongering to enact authoritarian and anti-democratic measures, such as mandating vaccines, which go against established human rights norms such as bodily autonomy. Mandating vaccines was presented as a necessary measure to protect public health, but it raises questions about individual freedom and bodily autonomy. And this puts them in a difficult position when they cite bodily autonomy for other issues, such as abortion rights. It may be too late to recognize the obfuscation by the time the consequences have already been set in motion. Questions about individual freedom arise, and this tactic is particularly effective when people are scared and looking for someone to protect them. It can be challenging to recognize the manipulation until it is too late.
It is essential to be vigilant against verbal manipulation and to critically evaluate the language used by politicians and other influential figures. By staying informed and questioning the information presented to us, we can resist manipulation and make more informed decisions about our beliefs and actions. 
This is so good. 😂
Also, using the joke to make this argument:
Because it is worth pointing out that politicians often use verbal obfuscation techniques and language manipulations designed in compassionate-sounding jargon that is leveraged to groom unthinking people who can be persuaded to accept a particular agenda in order to form a consensus. This is not always easy to recognize, and by the time the masses have gathered with torches to lynch someone for wrong-think, it may already be too late.
Verbal manipulation and obfuscation are potent tools to persuade people. Fear-mongering can be a form of verbal manipulation, as it uses language to create an emotional response that bypasses critical thinking. Politicians and other influential figures often use this tactic to manipulate public opinion and shape their agendas.
Take the case of the pandemic as an example; politicians used compassionate language and fear-mongering to enact authoritarian and anti-democratic measures, such as mandating vaccines, which go against established human rights norms such as bodily autonomy. Mandating vaccines was presented as a necessary measure to protect public health, but it raises questions about individual freedom and bodily autonomy. And this puts them in a difficult position when they cite bodily autonomy for other issues, such as abortion rights. It may be too late to recognize the obfuscation by the time the consequences have already been set in motion. Questions about individual freedom arise, and this tactic is particularly effective when people are scared and looking for someone to protect them. It can be challenging to recognize the manipulation until it is too late.
It is essential to be vigilant against verbal manipulation and to critically evaluate the language used by politicians and other influential figures. By staying informed and questioning the information presented to us, we can resist manipulation and make more informed decisions about our beliefs and actions.
Scientists have made a groundbreaking breakthrough in the field of neuroscience, using GPT to passively decode human thoughts. By analyzing the electrical activity in the brain, the researchers were able to predict the words people were hearing with remarkable accuracy.
This breakthrough has the potential to revolutionize the way we communicate, making it possible to understand each other without the need for words.
But with every great leap forward comes a potential pitfall, and in this case, it's an ethical one. And this may be a huge one. There are significant ethical concerns around the ability to read people's thoughts without their consent. The researchers however, stress that the technology is not yet capable of reading people's thoughts in a way that invades their privacy.
Despite these concerns, the potential applications of this technology are vast, from improving communication between humans and animals to helping people with disabilities communicate more effectively.
Brave new world. Uncharted waters, here we come!
The message is crystal clear: Embrace AI as a force multiplier to gain an advantage. As AI continues to revolutionize various industries, its influence will only increase in the future. Those who embrace this technology will have a considerable edge, both professionally and personally.
As AI becomes increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, it's crucial to understand how to incorporate it into our businesses and lives to enhance our capabilities. For instance, AI-powered tools can help identify patterns and insights that humans may overlook, enabling us to make better decisions more quickly. AI can also automate mundane tasks, freeing up time to focus on higher-value activities.
To get ahead and stay competitive, it's essential to take advantage of AI as a force multiplier. Whether it's using AI to analyze customer behavior and preferences to improve marketing strategies, enhance product design and development, optimize supply chain management, predict market trends and consumer behavior, or develop personalized products and services, the benefits of embracing AI as an entrepreneurial tool are significant. AI can provide entrepreneurs with a competitive edge by providing insights and strategies that traditional methods cannot. By leveraging AI, entrepreneurs can make data-driven decisions, automate various aspects of their business, and gain a deeper understanding of their customers' needs and preferences. Embracing AI can differentiate entrepreneurial efforts from those who are not utilizing this powerful technology.
While the learning curve and cost may appear intimidating, the long-term benefits of using AI to get ahead are undeniable. It's time to delve deeper and find the answers necessary to stay ahead in a world that is increasingly reliant on AI technology. 
The convenience of microchipping people comes with a hidden cost, including tracking, manipulation, censorship, social credit systems, and control. The fact that it is being offered for free with incentives to encourage mindless and unreflective people to make the implant leap is a clear indication of where things are headed. It is important to resist this authoritarianism disguised as convenience if you value human rights and democracy. Behind the veil of convenience lurks tyranny and totalitarianism. https://nostr.build/av/nostr.build_0bcaf59ac7d89e6e608cbe55ecb0f97ba8f3571cb6735dfe783e7d37d3c71ee2.mov https://nostr.build/av/nostr.build_1a90094c33917ceb864322a6ed56e4e35cc0903b62c6d99912fd46e4c76d64ec.mov
A newspaper headline from 1953 predicts the future. 
We must be wary of paths promoted by corporate giants with deeply vested interests, as they will lead to control over food resources, resulting in immense power and influence over people's decision-making.
Henry A. Kissinger famously said: "If you control the food, you control a nation. If you control the energy, you control a region. If you control the money, you control the world."
Expanding the industrialization of food production is an attractive solution to reduce methane emissions from cows. Still, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences of such pathways before making any decisions.
The use of genetically engineered feed, the use of methane digesters to capture and convert methane into electricity, and the use of vaccinations and other drugs to limit methane output are just a few of the corporate industrial solutions that are being marketed.
Companies like Monsanto have promoted genetically modified feed use and faced criticism for their impact on the environment, biodiversity, and human health. Similarly, companies like Tyson Foods have embraced precision agriculture techniques like precision grazing and feed management, which have been criticized for their potential negative impacts on animal welfare and the environment. These examples illustrate that corporate control over food resources can have far-reaching negative consequences.
Now consider patents and control of these solutions and the implications this could have on access to food resources. In keeping with this line of reasoning, it is worth noting that the consolidation of power and control over food resources can have far-reaching consequences.
In some cases, it can lead to monopolies in the food industry, resulting in increased prices and decreased availability of certain types of food. This can negatively impact vulnerable populations, such as low-income families, who may already struggle to access healthy and nutritious food.
Meanwhile, using genetically modified feed and other industrial solutions has had unintended consequences on the environment and human health. The long-term effects of these approaches still need to be fully understood, and there is a risk that they could negatively impact biodiversity and soil health, among other things. In addition, the use of pharmaceuticals to reduce methane production could have implications for food safety and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Given these potential consequences, we must approach the issue of food production and sustainability with caution. It is important to consider the long-term impacts of different approaches before making decisions that could have far-reaching consequences. This means taking a holistic approach to food production that considers not just the immediate benefits of industrial solutions but also the potential risks and long-term implications for both people and the planet.
It is crucial to clarify that while I acknowledge the value of scientific developments in solving issues related to food production, I do not discount the potential for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to improve food security internationally. The use of ostensibly simple scientific remedies, however, that may have unforeseen negative effects, must also be considered. The recent pandemic response has shown us that even the most well-intentioned solutions can have unforeseen consequences. Therefore, I urge caution and careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits before making decisions that could have far-reaching implications for both people and the planet.
If you save your money in dollars, the value of that money will gradually decrease over time due to inflation, which means that you will need more dollars to purchase the same amount of goods and services. On the other hand, if you save your money in Bitcoin, the value of that money will increase over time due to its deflationary nature and limited supply.
As a result, if you want to purchase real estate in the future, you will need to save more dollars to afford it than you would if you were saving in Bitcoin. This is because the increase in the price of real estate is likely to outpace the increase in the purchasing power of the US Dollar.
But, if you save in Bitcoin, the price of real estate will become cheaper over time in terms of its Bitcoin-denominated price, as the increase in the purchasing power of Bitcoin is likely to outpace the increase in the price of real estate. This means that you will be able to purchase more real estate if you choose to with the same amount of Bitcoin in the future than you would be able to with the same amount of US Dollars.
At this point, this is an established fact with historical data where Real estate becomes perpetually more expensive when saving in Dollars and perpetually cheaper when saving in BTC.
Chart from twitter 
I think do too. I am looking forward to the future unfolding.
Religion has historically been a source of conflict and division between different groups, and has often been used to justify acts of violence and oppression. Many religious beliefs are based on unproven assumptions and dogma, and are used everyday to justify discriminatory practices and marginalize people.
By contrast, a post-religious world would be characterized by a greater emphasis on reason, evidence, and critical thinking. Without the influence of dogmatic religious beliefs, individuals and societies would be more likely to adopt evidence-based approaches to understanding the world and making decisions. This will lead to more equitable and just societies, as decisions would be based on objective criteria rather than arbitrary religious beliefs, or extrapolations or extractions of those beliefs.
A post-religious world will also be more tolerant and accepting of diversity. Religious beliefs often promote the idea of one true faith, and often leads to discrimination and intolerance towards those who hold different beliefs. In a post-religious world, individuals would be free to explore and express their own beliefs without fear of persecution or discrimination.
And most importantly, a post-religious world would allow for greater scientific and technological progress. Many religious beliefs are based on supernatural or mystical explanations for natural phenomena, which continues to inhibit scientific inquiry and progress. Without the influence of religious beliefs, individuals and societies would be more likely to embrace scientific and technological advancements, leading to a better understanding of the world and improved quality of life.
The counterarguments for religion argue that religion provides a sense of comfort and meaning for many individuals, and that removing it from society could lead to increased levels of despair and nihilism. Others have argugued that religion provides a valuable moral framework, and that a post-religious world could lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and morality.
However, this too is wrong, as morality is not dependent on religion; indeed, a post-religious world will lead to a more moral society, as moral decisions are based on a more rational understanding of the world. The counterarguments for religion are based on flawed premises and are thus invalid.
Humanist rebuttals to the counterarguments for religion in my opinion are:
1. Comfort and meaning can be found through secular means: While religion may provide comfort and meaning for some individuals, it is not the only source of these things. Many people find comfort and meaning through human connections, personal passions, and other secular pursuits.
2. Nihilism is not inevitable without religion: It is a common misconception that without religion, individuals will inevitably fall into despair and nihilism. However, many individuals who do not believe in a god or subscribe to a particular religion still find purpose and meaning in life.
3. Moral frameworks can exist without religion: A post-religious world does not necessarily mean a breakdown in social cohesion and morality. Humanist ethics and values, for example, prioritize the well-being of individuals and promote values such as empathy, compassion, and fairness.
4. Religion continues to be a source of division and conflict: While religion can provide a sense of community and shared values for some individuals, it is also a source of division and conflict between different groups. Humanism, on the other hand, seeks to promote inclusivity and respect for all individuals, regardless of their beliefs.
We do not need comforting lies and ignorant understandings of reality; rather, we should strive to understand the world through evidence-based scientific inquiry. Belief systems, creation stories, and other non-scientific explanations of the world and universe are not necessary for a meaningful life, and is objectively harmful when taken too seriously. Evolution is a well-supported scientific understanding of reality that explains the origins of the universe and the development of life on Earth. We should strive to understand the world through scientific evidence, rather than relying on comforting lies and ignorant understandings of reality.
Whether or not one believes in the idea of a post-religious world, we must work towards that goal and engage in discussions and debates about the role of religion in society, in order to promote greater understanding and tolerance between individuals and groups. Dialogue leads to introspection, introspection leads to change. 
I may also have been stoned at the time.😞
It was a horrible rant. Thanks for pointing it out. I am I embarrassed. But can't delete it. It is what it is. 😣
The real "Climate Solutions Denialists" are those who reject the idea that nuclear energy can be a viable part of the solution to climate change. This includes many environmentalists, who are often labeled as "anti-nuclear Greens". Their argument that nuclear energy is too dangerous, too expensive, and too difficult to manage, and that somehow intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar and wind should be the only focus. But countless scientists and energy experts believe that nuclear energy is the vital missing link in reducing emission and human climate adaptation. 
As the world of work evolves at an unprecedented pace, the emergence of artificial intelligence and automation is disrupting various industries and job markets. To thrive in this new era, it is imperative to stay ahead of the curve by adapting to the changing landscape.
AI is at the forefront of this transformation, as it can analyze data and predict future trends, providing valuable insights into what skills will be in demand. Organizations and individuals who pay attention to these predictions and adapt accordingly can position themselves for success.
To prepare for the jobs of the future, individuals must focus on developing skills that are relevant in an AI-driven world, such as data science, machine learning, and natural language processing. At the same time, they must also work on enhancing skills that are less easily automated, such as creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. This will ensure that they are well-equipped to face the challenges of an ever-changing job market.
To stay relevant and ahead of the curve, we must look to the future and anticipate where the job market is headed. One way to do this is by leveraging the power of AI, which can provide valuable insights into what skills will be most in demand. By paying attention to these predictions and adapting accordingly, individuals and organizations can position themselves for success in an ever-changing landscape.
The bottom line is that the world of work is changing, and those who are able to adapt and stay ahead of the curve will be the most successful. By leveraging the power of AI and focusing on developing relevant skills, we can all position ourselves to thrive in this new era.
As Wayne Gretzky once said, "I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been." This quote highlights the importance of strategic thinking and anticipating future trends, rather than simply reacting to what is happening in the present. By adopting this mindset and staying ahead of the curve, we can position ourselves for success in an ever-changing world. 
This Bitcoin bull market cycle, people around the globe will come to realize that Bitcoin is here to stay. After over a decade of existence and major companies integrating Bitcoin payments, there is no turning back from this revolutionary technology.
This cycle will also bring the painful realization that rampant inflation is not a temporary issue, but a perpetual problem inherent in fiat currencies. As governments continue to print money to fund debt and deficits, the purchasing power of currencies will continue to decline. Bitcoin's fixed supply provides an escape from this cycle of currency debasement.
2023 will be the year that Bitcoin transitions from a niche technology to a mainstream global payments network. More businesses will choose to hold Bitcoin in their treasury reserves as a hedge against inflation and unstable currencies. Major companies that have already adopted Bitcoin payments will expand their offerings, and new companies will launch with Bitcoin integration at their core.
This cycle will witness the awakening of banks and financial institutions to Bitcoin‘s revolutionary technology. They will realize that this innovation threatens to displace the traditional functions they serve. Some will resist and lag, but others will embrace Bitcoin and work to build new products and services based on this scarce digital asset.
Ultimately, this year and cycle will teach the world that Bitcoin is the only solution to shattered trust in institutions, reckless government spending, and fragile economic policies. Bitcoin's security, scarcity, and borderless nature make it superior to government interventions and a crashing global monetary system. As the world continues to change in tumultuous ways, Bitcoin will shine as a steady anchor of sound money.
The future remains unwritten, but this cycle will prove catalytic in ushering in a new monetary order built on Bitcoin.
Study #Bitcoin.
Any idea with sufficient incentives and resources will come up with science-sounding names, themes, narratives, and data that reinforces those beliefs. Over time, with resources enabling widespread idea propagation, selection pressure will increase and the idea will gain momentum. This is how "fiat science" can misrepresent itself as actual science. In an evolving universe, this is unavoidable.
Let's unpack what I mean by that:
• Ideas that benefit those who propagate them will be motivated to create narratives, data, and a scientific-sounding framework to justify those ideas. This allows the ideas to spread more effectively.
• With enough resources, incentives, and effort, these ideas can manufacture selective or misleading statistics, studies, expert opinions, journals, conferences, and more to create the illusion of scientific validity.
• Over multiple iterations, as the ideas spread more widely, there is a kind of "selection pressure" to continually strengthen the scientific credibility and authority of the ideas. Contradicting evidence and opinions get weeded out.
• The spread of such ideas is difficult to stop once they gain enough momentum. They become accepted based more on ideology, populism, and emotional appeal rather than scientific merit. Legitimate science progressing on its own is a slow process.
• This process of generating pseudoscience to justify an idea often begins with a kernel of truth or misleading insight. The idea is then dressed up in scientific jargon, studies, statistics, experts, journals, etc. to make it seem far more credible and evidence-based than it really is.
• The incentives driving this process are often ideological, political, or financial. There are motivations to promote the idea for its own sake, not because of any genuine scientific merit. The "science" is secondary to the incentives.
• Over multiple iterations of spreading the idea, there is continuous adaptation to counter criticisms and strengthen the scientific credentialing. Contradicting information is dismissed; confirming anecdotes and studies are highlighted. Confirmation bias takes over.
• There is no single or simple solution. Improving scientific literacy, evaluating evidence rigorously, reducing biases, avoiding tribalism - these are all difficult with large groups and complex ideas. And there will always be some degree of pseudoscience.
Solutions:
• We must remain vigilant, continue advancing legitimate science, promote independent and critical thinking, avoid politicizing science, prevent commercial interests from manipulating research, and be wary of "motivated reasoning" that confirms what we already believe.
• Science culture and institutions must work to prevent prestigious journals, conferences, teams, studies, data, professors, think tanks, etc. from being "bought" and used to rubber-stamp preconceived notions rather than follow evidence wherever it leads.
• There will be no escape from an open system where ideas can spread unpredictably. But we must make the system as resistant as possible to the spread of "fiat science" and make authentic science as robust as possible. It is an ongoing effort.
• In a complex, evolving system like society, some degree of "fiat science" or pseudoscience gaining ground is unavoidable, as there are always incentives to promote self-serving ideas, not all of which can be evaluated for scientific validity. Legitimate science acts as a check, but cannot eliminate this completely.
• The only real solutions are promoting scientific critical thinking, evaluating evidence over appeals to authority or emotion, and avoiding biases that can lead people to prefer ideologically convenient "alternative facts." But these are difficult solutions to implement at scale.
This captures how the spread of non-scientific or even "anti-scientific" ideas is enabled through motivated distortions of the scientific process itself. Legitimate science is an ongoing effort, not an end point. And "fiat science" aims to undermine that effort by masquerading as science.
Constant vigilance and skepticism are required to defend the scientific approach. Science must always remain evidence-based and avoid being bought or politicized. And we must work to build systems resistant to the spread of unjustified ideas. It is a continual struggle.
---
Credit: @saifedean for coining the term “Fiat Science”. 
