check out
https://classic.coinos.io/login nostr:note1ljfudawfnghuhjftlmfwqh7carr405azq4lnu0qddw4saxqyagqsrsfy7s
"Hey I heard you like custodians. So we made a federated custodian to hold your centralized custodians dollar certificate"
^This is liquid USDT
Exactly! This dude knows. Its working as intended
You're telling me, you log into VRChat or some other VR social game and you hit up your buddies on discord like "Bro waiting on you in the metaverse right now you coming?" Like that? XD because all I'm saying is that sounds silly when used unironically
Yes. No one uses that term outside of a marketing context. Facebook "meta" shoot I think Microsoft is trying to advertise video game avatars for business meetings as "metaverse avatars".
If you understand "fuck" you understand social communication XD
Crypto? I was talking about VRChat (a real game that fits the description of a metaverse even though no one calls it that). I didn't say anything about no crypto.
Cringe. Back in my day, VRChat was just another mmorpg style game where people talked to each other in lobbies. Almost akin to a convention of sorts, but we never called it "metaverse".
Damn I hate marketing terminology
This is neat. I like this.
How bad would a "nap" mess with your circadian rhythm
People just have to agree to stop running nodes that contain changes basically. I don't think it should happen for its own sake though. Review a change proposal and decide if its worthwhile.
"You who stand before me... Offer Poes so as to return them to the afterlife.
Poes are pitiful beings who have lost their way home and wander the depths of this land.
Good... Evil... That's the futile perspective of narrow-minded beings. There is no such distinction in wandering spirits."
&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=6f9f9e933859d79cb2bd8092284950a4a52412e00308d8881f24e392d8d73cfb&ipo=images
What do you mean "both"? Remember Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican (Republicans of then and now are completely different etc etc add ins you gotta mention to not distract from your real point)
Point is, at the time he was a 3rd party. So "why not both" assumes each is equally valid.
Now coalitions on the other hand like I hear about some European countries doing could be interesting.
Yeah I was thinking more opsec you know? Like a hunter doesn't have to worry about being hunted later on you know? They've just revealed their height and race in this picture. Combine that with any piece of those clothes being unique to their wardrobe in any way, and it still might not be enough, but enough of these little revelations add up until their 100% identified.
Like before this picture, we could have assumed 1 person was doing this, or 50. We would have no idea, but now its more clear (there could still be 50 but we could limit our search to just these two until later).
Bring them ALL down! ✊🇬🇧
DailyMail:
More ULEZ spy cameras stolen by activists as Sadiq Khan faces growing backlash over expansion of hated scheme which sees motorists charged £12.50 EVERY time they drive
Around 500 out of 2,700 cameras appeared to be marked as out of action, missing or damaged. https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1698351333252734976/pu/vid/636x360/Xay081TKrQrxIfxN.mp4
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12476015/ULEZ-vigilantes-strike-spy-cameras-stolen.html
Why pose for a selfie though?
Yeah lol, but here's another consideration for you. In a drivechain world, you run your own node to make sure you're not accepting counterfeit coins and that all of the rules are being followed. Maybe you aren't using any side chains though. Is it safe to not run side chain nodes?
Each side chain has these rules that they are expecting miners to follow. If its broken, those nodes will reject that block, but you... You don't know about those rules. There shouldn't be anything wrong with this block. To you, Bitcoin gets 51% attacked to correct the side chain rule break. Alternatively, that side chain gets orphaned forever.