The backlash against the Trump token by some in the Bitcoin community exposes a hypocrisy: while Bitcoin champions decentralisation, permissionless systems, and freedom, criticizing or opposing others for launching tokens contradicts these very principles. Just as freedom of speech protects even unpopular opinions, blockchain’s ethos must protect the right to create, innovate, and experiment, even if some disapprove. Restricting this freedom undermines the ideals Bitcoin claims to uphold.

This issue feels like a freedom of speech debate. Many Bitcoiners opposing other networks reveal a hypocrisy—are they truly defending decentralization, or just protecting their own profits?

Can someone explain, as I understand, a uniquely different thing with Nostr is that a user cannot delete content depending on how certain relay policies work?