The red line is the trajectory of the first bullet that allegedly grazed #Trump’s ear. Assuming that the bullet passed closed enough by Trump’s right side of his face, which part of his face would the bullet have grazed? His cheek? The bottom of his ear? The top of his ear? Other?
#asknostr #StagedAssassination #TrumpAssassination #FalseFlag
Saylor is certainly one of them. Trump is next.
Here is the excerpt in which Christopher Wray refuses to acknowledge that #Trump’s ear got grazed by a bullet: https://youtu.be/RxmqdhLxN3E
FBI Director testified that #Trump may not have been hit by a bullet but a shrapnel. How is it possible that we wouldn’t know for sure by now? Limited hangout? Maybe he doesn’t want to be prosecuted for lying? Until, we see a thorough rebuttal of the staged assassination hypothesis, we can’t exclude it.
#StagedAssassination #TrumpAssassination #DeepState #FalseFlag
Trump appointed the swamp during his first presidency, why would he changed? Those thinking his fighting the deep state are getting fooled (one more time).
JUST IN: Fox News reports President Trump will announce a #Bitcoin strategic reserve in Nashville. https://video.nostr.build/4558b7a09076763ef89eb77c3c01fb79ec23294a686c6d32123cc4be58078283.mp4
And Mexico will pay for it?
I would add they we’ll never know for sure if it was staged or not because the evidences (such as ballistic or other) that would allow us to know for sure could only have been collected by the FBI. Whether or not, the assassination is staged, the FBI have no interest in releasing these info because they would be involved in both cases. The exception would be regarding medical information. Trump’s medical staff should have an interest in releasing Trump’s medical info in the scenario where this assassination attempt was real but because there hasn’t been pressure from the public that this assassination could have been staged there were no need for them to do so.
If the #TrumpAssassination was staged it would be a perfectly executed #PsyOp.
We’ll probably never have the evidences to definitely prove whether it was staged or not. In absence of definitive evidence proving that it was staged, the research community will be assuming that it was a #DeepState op aiming to eliminate #Trump because it’s obvious that deep state agencies such as the FBI are retaining or even dissimulating evidences. That’s the behavior we would expect from an actor attempting to hide their criminal enterprise. Researchers will continue to try solving the plot but no matter how far they go on their understanding of who was shooting at what, their analysis won’t rule out a staged assassination (because they haven’t been studying this hypothesis) and so they would end up with wrong conclusions if the assassination was actually staged. That said, if Trump is part of the deep state, then this outcome would exactly be the one the deep state would have seek to accomplish hence it would be a perfectly executed psyop. The deep state would have nothing to fear by dissimulating evidences because Trump won’t never go after them anyway.
The solution would be for the research community to be more curious and consider that the assassination could have been staged. There are clues that should justify more curiosity. For instance, why doesn’t the Trump camp inquire to establish the facts? If Trump isn’t part of a staged assassination, shouldn’t he want to know all the facts on his alleged assassination? So far, he doesn’t appear to be actively seeking for answers and he seems satisfied with the hypothesis of the lone wolf attack (which had already been refuted). This doesn’t add up but as long as the staged assassination hypothesis is being ignored, we won’t be able to refute the staged assassination hypothesis.
Trump doesn’t control them but he’s likely a deep state asset (like Biden). We don’t have yet all the details on this event and Trump isn’t even pushing for the facts to be established.
Updated analysis on the Trump assassination being staged:
I think the deep state is involved in this operation but the case I’ll be making below is that we can’t exclude that this operation is a staged assassination attempt.
Indeed, many of us in the “truther” community came to the conclusion that Trump, to the same extent as Biden, is a deep state asset. If this is true, it would then be difficult to explain why the deep state would want to assassinate their front-running candidate.
You may find ridiculous the idea that Trump is a deep state asset when the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state is broadly accepted. However, did you know that Trump has numerous deep state ties including with the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros? Also, how to explain the involvement of Trump in the deep state Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) if Trump is going after the deep state? In 2016, Trump got elected on the promise that he will drain the swamp but instead of draining it, he appointed the swamp to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of Epstein). Don’t believe me? I recommend you watched these two mirrored videos from Jake Morphonios (most of his research had been taken off the internet):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WpxeUOiWikO9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QAW9y6emuHWB
If it is a false flag, then how can we explain that the deep state would have taken the risk to kill Trump by aiming at his ear? It seems like a very dangerous stunt even for a skilled shooter. To this my response is, what if the perception that Trump was shot at was an illusion akin to a magic show in which things appear or disappear in front our eyes? What evidence do we have that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? We have:
1. photographic evidence:
Bullet passing by Trump:
[see attachments]
Blood on Trump’s right hand after touching his ear:
[see attachments]
2. ballistic sound analysis evidence. (source: youtu.be/LouUbMYb7Bc)
3. ballistic trajectory evidence
[see attachments]
Are these evidences indisputable proofs that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear or that Trump was shot at? As of now, I would say no and here is why.
First regarding the photographic evidence. It’s important to note that these photos were taken by Doug Mills who is a renowned photographer but also part of the “mockingbird media sphere”. Interesting fact, did you know that he’s the photographer who took the photo of Bush in a classroom when being notified that the 9/11 attacks just happened? (source: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/26/doug-mills-iconic-president-photos-226744/ / During Sarasota visit, President George W. Bush learned of 9/11 attack ). Since Doug Mills has been following many Presidents it’s not necessarily improbable that he was with Bush on 9/11, however what are the chances that he would be covering a small Trump’s rally? Has Doug Mills covered other Trump’s rallies? If not, he’s for sure very lucky to have been attending this one.
Also, I’m not an expert in photo forensic but until we have the confirmation from multiple independent experts that these photos haven’t been tampered with, I wouldn’t consider these photographic evidences as definitive evidence. It’s even possible that these photos could have been edited in way that is undetectable especially as image tampering tech is getting more sophisticated with for instance the use of neural network-based methods. If the deep state has this capability, you can be sure that they would make use of it. What if the bullet and blood would have been added to the originals? I’ve looked at the video of the shooting and while the resolution is not as good, I couldn’t see any trace of blood on Trump’s right hand. This element is certainly worth investigating further.
Screenshots from the video showing no apparent trace of blood:
[See attachments]
Even if there were traces of blood on the video, it’s possible that some red ink would have been placed behind Trump’s ear. Sometime low-tech magic tricks are the most effective. However, this alone wouldn’t explain the first image with the bullet passing near Trump but again, because of the advance in image forensics, nothing should definitely be excluded here.
Second, regarding the ballistic sound analysis evidence the hypothesis is that some bullets are passing by Trump’s microphone which leads us to conclude that the first three shots are composed of a supersonic bullet shockwave followed by the report. However, in the hypothesis in which no bullet were aimed at Trump, could we come to a different but still coherent analysis? For instance, it could be possible that the first six sounds (three cracks and three booms) are actually coming from two different guns (with two different sound signature) shooting in a synchronized manner to appear as they were shot from a single gun shooting three bullets at Trump. The video analysis from John Cullen support the hypothesis that there were mutiple shooters. He think there are at least two shooters and probably three. From the point where we agree that there are more than one shooter, the scenario of the lone wolf is debunked and so we could entertain the idea that there may be four, five or even more shooters. Those could be hidding inside a building, in the forest or other surroundings. Source: https://rumble.com/v57dfwl-brave-tv-ep-1821-john-cullen-breaking-open-the-trump-assassination-attempt-.html
Third, regarding the ballistic trajectory proving that the victims/injured in the crowd (including Corey Comperatore) as well as the hydraulic line were in the line of sight of Crooks aiming at Trump, here again, this conclusion is so far solely based on the hypothesis that Crooks shot at Trump. I have not seen any ballistic evidence that Comperatore got shot by Crooks and Chris Martenson believes that the most likely shot to have had hit the spectator in the right bleacher would be a rising shot which eliminates the hypothesis that this shot would have been from Crooks. In the same way, the deep state would have faked an auditory signature coherent with the hypothesis that shots were coming from Crooks, they could have faked a “line of casualties” coherent with the hypothesis that Crooks was the one taking the shots. Plus, we actually have no evidence that Crooks took a single shot. At this time, there still had been no official communication to provide the pubic with any details. A day or two after the shooting, the FBI cleaned up the roof where Crooks was positioned. Have they collected evidences of how many shots Crooks took before the clean up? If so, why not? It would seem that if the FBI was complice in the alleged assassination attempt, they would have wanted to collect any evidence supporting the lone wolf attack. If there weren’t they would still have wanted to collect this evidence.
In conclusion, there isn’t yet any evidence allowing us to indisputably conclude that any shot was aimed at Trump. Both ballistic trajectory and sound evidences don’t prove that any shot was aimed at Trump. Under the hypothesis that it was a staged assassination attempt, Crooks would have been used as a decoy to misdirect the attention of the research community to him by creating the illusion that because shots were within Crooks’ line of sight, they must have been fired by him and because the sound signature is somewhat coherent with shots that could have been fired by Crooks, they must also have been coming from him.
If the scenario of an assassination attempt can’t be confirmed yet, what evidences do we have to support the scenario of a staged assassination? First, we should remind ourselves that the deep state had executed several more complex false flag operations before. So saying “it couldn’t have been done” is ignoring a core expertise of the deep state. To be clear, I don’t think we have any definitive evidence for this scenario either but I think it removes a lot of unanswered questions that remains with the scenario of an assassination attempt. Here are some elements that weights towards it:
- Despite the presence of multiple shooters (some with military equipment) and having only one (maybe two) shooter being neutralized, they failed their alleged assassination mission. All shooters missed their target. At this point, it would seem that the deep state in charge of eliminating Trump would have been even sloppier than the allege sloppiness of the Secret Service. What if the mission of the deep state was to stage an assassination attempt?
- We have evidence that one shooter directly aimed at the crowd. Based on the video analysis from John Cullen, the first shot wasn’t aimed at Trump. It was aimed at the crowd present in the right bleacher. Cullen makes the hypothesis that this shot was aimed at the first SS sniper team (and missed) but I would make the case that this trajectory (if confirmed) was probably to argue plausible deniability (that the shooter’s target wasn’t the crowd but the SS sniper) in the event in which video evidence of this shot trajectory were to be surfaced by the public (which ended up happening). It’s true that the sniper moved at the moment of the shot but here again, maybe this move was coordinated between the SS sniper and the shooter both particpating in the same deep state operation. Also, Cullen hypothesis would fail to explain why would the shooters only target one SS sniper unit when at least two where present (and they are both composed of two snipers). It would have seemed more effective for all shooters to be aiming at Trump.
- The presence of the “mockingbird” photograph Doug Mills needs further investigation. How many Trump’s rallies was Doug Mills present at? Why would he have chosen this one which was a small rally?
- The timing of the shooting is interesting. The shooting happened as Trump was commenting a chart (it would be interesting to know how often Trump has commented a chart before in his rallies). As a magician on stage, Trump could have been using the power of attention and misdirection to successfully divert the attention of the crowd off of him. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that Trump said “take a look” five times (and pointed at the chart) to direct the attention of the public to the chart just before the shots started. Maybe this explains why we still don’t have any footage from crowd that was behind Trump. Maybe all eyes were focused on the chart. That’s too bad because it may have help us settling the question as to whether or not a bullet grazed Trump’s ear.
- If the deep state had organized an assassination of Trump, then why don’t we have more official communication supporting the thesis of the lone wolf attack? On the other, if the Trump was the victim of an assassination attempt, why wouldn’t Trump put more pressure in investigating this matter? Trump has had multiple opportunities since the shooting to press for a thorough investigation but he has remained silent. Wouldn’t he want to know who attempted to kill him? At the minimum, he could have said that once elected, he will be investigating this matter. Maybe Trump simply believes the scenario of the lone wold attack in which case, he would admit that he doesn’t believe the deep state is after him. The silence of both alleged enemy parties (Trump and the deep state) could be perceived as a form of collusion in which none wants the truth to emerge. Could it be because it was a staged assassination?
- Trump has already participated in a deep state psyop in the past. Trump was an active participant in the Qanon operation. Indeed, initially the Qanon narrative gained a lot of credibility through the Qproofs (source: https://qproofs.com/q-proofs) which were proofs that Trump and Q were coordinating through “cryptic messages”. While some people still believe the Qanon narrative while other think that it was a joke, many came to the conclusion that Qanon was a deep state psyop aiming to misdirect and discredit the pedogate/pizzagate research which originated from some Wikileaks documents. The operation had been quite successful as most people now believe that the pizzagate narrative originated from Qanon whereas the primary materials actually came from Wikileaks (Podesta and DNC emails). So admitting that Qanon is a deep state psyop and Trump was actively participating in it. How can you make sense of the narrative that Trump hasn’t been working hand and hand with the deep state? So far, no one had been able to resolve this contradiction other than by dismissing Qanon as being “fake”. Most likely, Trump is a deep state asset and I would argue that the belief that the deep state is after Trump is the primary mental blocker as to why many people will not entertain the possibility that this assassination attempt could have been staged. By the way, did you know that the “Fight, fight, fight” statement made by Trump right after his alleged assassination attempt is a famous Qanon reference? Here is the proof:
https://qanon.pub/?q=FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
https://qanon.pub/?q=Fight%2C Fight%2C Fight
Do you believe that Qanon is a legit anti deep state operation or a controlled opposition deep state operation? That should give you a clue as to whether this alleged assassination attempt was staged or not. It’s unclear why Trump would be making a reference to Qanon although one hypothesis is that this auditory message would have the effect to mobilize past Qanon followers through a phenomenon called subliminal auditory priming.
- In the end, this alleged assassination strongly solidify the posture of Trump as a national Hero victim of dark deep state forces. The sequence of events aligns perfectly to benefit the Trump camp (right before the RNC). Overall, it almost seems too perfect for Trump (and maybe scripted) than organic chaos.
- The recount of the shooting by Trump (during the RNC) is not authentic and seems scripted. He often talks from a perspective which wasn’t his. For instance, he says that while he was still on the ground, the crowd was pointing at the shooter and people could see all the blood (source: youtu.be/4MVep85ykg4).
- There are numerous past evidences that Trump is owned by some elements of the deep state hence, why would they want to kill him unless the deep state is divided in multiple factions of divergent interests.
What would be the motives for a staged assassination attempt?
- Counter the rise of RFK (non-controlled opposition) currently polling at 19%. Trump has recently been mirrorring several of RFK’s talking points including on crypto, health and now unity.
- Discredit the narrative that Trump is a deep state asset or at least that Trump can’t be trusted. Trump has lost a lot of support among his supporters (especially within the evengelical segment) since his mismanagement of the plandemic and stance on Covid vaccines.
- Prop up Trump as a national Hero and broadening his support (especially among libetarians and independents) in preparation of a potential involvement in WW3 (or other major crisis that will require the mobilization and support of the whole population)
#Trump #TrumpAssassination #EarGate #PsyOp #FalseFlag #DeepState 
This will need an update as the ballistic sound evidence seems to indicate that the first three bullets could have passed close to the microphone. I’m still waiting for additional analysis for more clarity.
It’s just to keep the news cycle rolling with a story that can obscure the previous one. They just don’t want to make room to discuss the incongruities related to the alleged assassination attempt of #Trump.
‚Between 2017 and 2021, #Amazon had more than $25 billion in losses from its devices business, according to the documents.‘
https://www.wsj.com/tech/amazon-alexa-devices-echo-losses-strategy-25f2581a
The #SurveillanceState infrastructure doesn’t have a price.
Some people still believe that the “Q prophecies” are going to happen (but it’s delusional if you ask me). Other people minimize how key of a narrative Qanon was at the time either because they don’t know much about or because they are in denial that they got fooled.
The most important part of Qanon are the Qproofs which established a coordination between Trump and Q. Here is a website that archived many Qproofs (I’m not sure if it’s all of them or not). https://qproofs.com/q-proofs
Don’t believe #Trump can be controlled-opposition by the #DeepState? Do you still believe that Boris Johnson is the Trump of the UK? That was the narrative pushed by the mockingbird media during the Brexit.
100% mockingbird media disinfo here.
The lies of the mockingbird media towards #Trump are so apparent that you really have to question what other layers of deception are out there. The #DeepState is expert in social engineering. If you think they are working to manipulate the perception of only 50% of the population then you’re getting it wrong. Think of reverse psychology as another layer of deception.
#PsyOp
I do agree that allies to the DNC and RNC don’t exactly align but I think that the hierarchical top of the deep state has about the same influence over the two parties. In short, both parties have us move towards the same goal. For instance, in his first term, Trump legalized pre-crime, then Biden extend the definition of domestic terrorism, now Trump will come back to finish the job to strengthen the #SurveillanceState apparatus. Thiel and Schmidt are the two most influential personality from the Bilderberg. Schmidt control the DNC, Thiel the RNC. Of course, neither you or me can know for sure what the truth is regarding these networks of influences, but my assessment is that for the most part, a common agenda is being pushed through the two parties and Trump has no intention to stop it.
If you read and watch the materials I shared in my note on the staged assassination you’ll see that Trump has multiple deep state connections and that he appointed deep state figures during his first term. Generally, Trump supporters acknowledge this but gives Trump a pass by explaining that he was new to the game. But at which point do we really start doubting that he’s being played? Another excuse was that Trump was playing 4D chess. This time has passed, hasn’t it? Trump just nominated Vance as his VP (see nostr:npub1g0587hzzckcncxfm78n0996qe2s58nspy29wf02tqcj5sdzcpj4q6j40hv research to understand how this is going to advance the deep state agenda) and #Trump said that he’s very happy for choosing him. Are we still playing 4D chess here? But people will excuse him because allegedly, the deep state attempted to kill him. Trump actually doesn’t prevent the agenda of the deep state, he enables it by disabling the real opposition.
And of course we could make a laundry list of events supporting that the deep state is after Trump versus those supporting that he’s part of the deep state. That’s the nature of a controlled opposition asset. If you just count the pro and cons they will even out. The challenge is to sort out the signals from the noise to gain more clarity on the game that is being played. For me a key moment to figure it out was when I understood that Qanon was a deep state psyop and that Trump participated in it. Many Trump supporters ignore this element either because it is uncomfortable or they didn’t follow it enough but IMO it’s one that really can unlock your understanding unless you believe that the Qanon episode was “fake” or a joke which if you’ve followed it a bit, you would know that it’s not the case.
If you read and watch the materials I shared in my note on the staged assassination you’ll see that Trump has multiple deep state connections and that he appointed deep state figures during his first term. Generally, Trump supporters acknowledge this but gives Trump a pass by explaining that he was new to the game. But at which point do we really start doubting that he’s being played? Another excuse was that Trump was playing 4D chess. This time has passed, hasn’t it? Trump just nominated Vance as his VP (see nostr:npub1g0587hzzckcncxfm78n0996qe2s58nspy29wf02tqcj5sdzcpj4q6j40hv research to understand how this is going to advance the deep state agenda) and #Trump said that he’s very happy for choosing him. Are we still playing 4D chess here? But people will excuse him because allegedly, the deep state attempted to kill him. Trump actually doesn’t prevent the agenda of the deep state, he enables it by disabling the real opposition.